From the Editor

Richard Just
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Richard Just
Dec. 11, 2015, 5 a.m.

In early 2014, I was offered what I will, for the rest of my life, con­sider an amaz­ing op­por­tun­ity: the chance to edit Na­tion­al Journ­al magazine. The job was per­fect and daunt­ing all at once. NJ had le­gendary stature but also faced a massive chal­lenge: Like all print pub­lic­a­tions, it needed to fig­ure out how to jus­ti­fy its ex­ist­ence in the In­ter­net age.

The past two years have been fun and re­ward­ing not in spite of this chal­lenge, but be­cause of it. While the magazine is end­ing with this is­sue, the pro­cess of try­ing to re­shape the pub­lic­a­tion—by put­ting a new twist on its tra­di­tions and em­phas­iz­ing long-form storytelling and el­eg­ant design—yiel­ded many in­di­vidu­al pieces and over­all is­sues that my col­leagues and I are ex­tremely proud of.

We were quite lucky in at least one sense: As should be clear from read­ing the re­col­lec­tions of the NJ stal­warts who wrote for this is­sue, the journ­al­ist­ic tra­di­tion that NJ had built up over time—the one that we in­her­ited—was ex­traordin­ary. It was a tra­di­tion that had, for dec­ades, in­sisted that the de­tails of policy and polit­ics mattered enorm­ously. That the de­cision-makers be­hind the scenes could not be ig­nored. That there was no short­age of in­vest­ig­at­ive dig­ging to be done in Wash­ing­ton. That re­port­ing and ar­gu­ment could strengthen each oth­er. That a magazine could earn the re­spect of both con­ser­vat­ives and lib­er­als.

There is one oth­er theme that is abund­antly clear from these re­col­lec­tions—and it too is part of the tra­di­tion of this place: Na­tion­al Journ­al has al­ways been a magazine with a streak of ideal­ism. Put­ting out a weekly is in­ev­it­ably gruel­ing. If you don’t be­lieve in what you’re do­ing, the stress and long hours will nev­er seem worth it. Read the re­mem­brances in this is­sue, and you will have no doubt that gen­er­a­tion after gen­er­a­tion of NJ writers, ed­it­ors, and staffers were pas­sion­ate about their work.

My col­leagues and I are no ex­cep­tions. We con­tin­ued to strive, right up un­til our very last is­sue, to pub­lish as strong a magazine as pos­sible. I want to thank every­one who was on the magazine’s small team over the past two years; but in par­tic­u­lar, I want to ac­know­ledge and thank An­die Coller, the magazine’s bril­liant deputy ed­it­or, who twice served as act­ing ed­it­or.

All of us are im­mensely proud to have been part of the Na­tion­al Journ­al tra­di­tion. And we know that the 46-year run of this magazine will be re­membered and cel­eb­rated for a long time to come.

Richard Just

Ed­it­or, Na­tion­al Journ­al magazine

What We're Following See More »
JUST AS SENATE VOTES ITS DISAPPROVAL
Trump Backtracks on Putin's "Incredible Offer"
2 days ago
THE LATEST
ARMS CONTROL, SYRIA WERE DISCUSSED
Russians Refer to "Verbal Agreements" with Trump
3 days ago
THE LATEST

"Two days after President Trump’s summit with Russian President Vladi­mir Putin, Russian officials offered a string of assertions about what the two leaders had achieved. 'Important verbal agreements' were reached at the Helsinki meeting, Russia’s ambassador to the United States, Anatoly Antonov, told reporters in Moscow Wednesday, including preservation of the New Start and INF agreements," and cooperation in Syria.

Source:
WAS "GRUDGINGLY" CONVINCED
Trump Was Shown Proof of Russian Interference Before Inauguration
3 days ago
THE LATEST

"Two weeks before his inauguration, Donald J. Trump was shown highly classified intelligence indicating that President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia had personally ordered complex cyberattacks to sway the 2016 American election. The evidence included texts and emails from Russian military officers and information gleaned from a top-secret source close to Mr. Putin, who had described to the C.I.A. how the Kremlin decided to execute its campaign of hacking and disinformation. Mr. Trump sounded grudgingly convinced, according to several people who attended the intelligence briefing. But ever since, Mr. Trump has tried to cloud the very clear findings that he received on Jan. 6, 2017, which his own intelligence leaders have unanimously endorsed."

TAKE THAT, HATERS
Trump: High IQ People Loved the Putin Meeting
3 days ago
THE LATEST
"POLICY DIFFERENCES DON'T MATTER"
Comey Says to Vote Democratic This Fall
4 days ago
THE LATEST
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login