Politics

Obama Greets Ruling With Praise, Concern

Both Obama and Romney say the ruling underscores the need for comprehensive federal reform.

Sophie Quinton
Add to Briefcase
Sophie Quinton
June 25, 2012, 12:30 p.m.

Pres­id­ent Obama on Monday ap­plauded the Su­preme Court’s de­cision to strike down most of Ari­zona’s im­mig­ra­tion law but said he was con­cerned about the con­tro­ver­sial “show me your pa­pers” pro­vi­sion that was up­held.

“I re­main con­cerned about the prac­tic­al im­pact of the re­main­ing pro­vi­sion of the Ari­zona law that re­quires loc­al law en­force­ment of­fi­cials to check the im­mig­ra­tion status of any­one they even sus­pect to be here il­leg­ally,” he said in a state­ment.

“What this de­cision makes un­mis­tak­ably clear is that Con­gress must act on com­pre­hens­ive im­mig­ra­tion re­form,” Obama ad­ded. “A patch­work of thate laws is not a solu­tion to our broken im­mig­ra­tion sys­tem— it’s part of the prob­lem.”

Obama’s all-but-as­sured GOP rival this fall, Mitt Rom­ney, drew a sim­il­ar con­clu­sion from the rul­ing. But while Rom­ney cri­ti­cized Obama for fail­ing to lead on the is­sue, Obama stressed the need for Con­gress to act. The pres­id­ent, who has en­countered sol­id GOP op­pos­i­tion, de­clared him­self ready to work with any­one in Con­gress­in­ter­ested in com­pre­hens­ive im­mig­ra­tion re­form.

White House press sec­ret­ary Jay Car­ney cri­ti­cized Rom­ney for be­ing sup­port­ive of SB 1070, the law the court largely struck down. “Rom­ney has em­braced the Ari­zona law as a mod­el for the na­tion — which does not sug­gest a de­sire for com­pre­hens­ive bi­par­tis­an im­mig­ra­tion re­form,” he said.

Rom­ney did cite an Ari­zona im­mig­ra­tion law as a mod­el for the na­tion, but it wasn’t SB 1070; it was an earli­er law re­quir­ing em­ploy­ers to check the im­mig­ra­tion status of po­ten­tial work­ers through a fed­er­al on­line data­base called E-Veri­fy.

What We're Following See More »
INDICTMENTS NOT PROOF OF COLLUSION
Rosenstein Holds Presser On Russian Indictments
3 days ago
THE DETAILS
Source:
CONTRADICTS TRUMP’S DENIALS
U.S. Indicts 13 Russian Nationals For Election Interference
3 days ago
THE LATEST

The indictment, filed in the District of Columbia, alleges that the interference began "in or around 2014," when the defendants began tracking and studying U.S. social media sites. They "created and controlled numerous Twitter accounts" and "purchased computer servers located inside the United States" to mask their identities, some of which were stolen. The interference was coordinated by election interference "specialists," and focused on the Black Lives Matter movement, immigration, and other divisive issues. "By early to mid-2016" the groups began supporting the campaign of "then-candidate Donald Trump," including by communicating with "unwitting individuals associated with the Trump Campaign..."

Source:
“QUEEN FOR A DAY”
Gates Said to Be Finalizing a Plea Deal
3 days ago
THE LATEST

"Former Trump campaign adviser Rick Gates is finalizing a plea deal with special counsel Robert Mueller's office, indicating he's poised to cooperate in the investigation, according to sources familiar with the case. Gates has already spoken to Mueller's team about his case and has been in plea negotiations for about a month. He's had what criminal lawyers call a 'Queen for a Day' interview, in which a defendant answers any questions from the prosecutors' team, including about his own case and other potential criminal activity he witnessed."

Source:
ZERO-FOR-TWO
Another Defeat for Immigration Legislation in the Senate
3 days ago
THE LATEST

"The Senate on Thursday rejected immigration legislation crafted by centrists in both parties after President Trump threatened to veto the bill if it made it to his desk. In a 54-45 vote, the Senate failed to advance the legislation from eight Republican, seven Democratic and one Independent senators. It needed 60 votes to overcome a procedural hurdle. "

Source:
DISPUTE ASSERTION OF EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE
House Intel Panel Could Charge Bannon with Contempt
3 days ago
THE LATEST

"The House Intelligence Committee has scheduled a Thursday meeting to hear testimony from Steve Bannon—but it's an open question whether President Donald Trump's former chief strategist will even show up. The White House sent a letter to Capitol Hill late Wednesday laying out its explanation for why Trump's transition period falls under its authority to assert executive privilege, a move intended to shield Bannon from answering questions about that time period." Both Republicans and Democrats on the committee dispute the White House's theory, and have floated charging Bannon with contempt should he refuse to appear.

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login