ABC/Univision’s Fusion and National Journal’s “Next America” Project Announce Editorial Partnership
WASHINGTON, D.C., Oct. 30 ““ National Journal‘s “Next America” project and Fusion are teaming up to jointly produce political, economic and cultural news for a more ethnically diverse America. The partnership was announced today by Fusion CEO Isaac Lee and Ronald Brownstein, editorial director of Atlantic Media, National Journal‘s parent company. Fusion, which launched on Monday, is the new TV and digital network from ABC and Univision.
“America is undergoing the most profound demographic change since the turn of the 20th century. Just look at the impact it’s had on politics,” said Ronald Brownstein. “Through ‘Next America,’ our goal is to show how this wave is also transforming classrooms, workplaces and communities around the country. We are honored to partner in that effort with Fusion, a uniquely innovative effort to explore and understand how the rapidly growing Hispanic community is reshaping and reimagining American life.”
“A deep understanding of the changing face of the U.S. is what propelled two giants — ABC and Univision — to create this groundbreaking TV and digital network. Every day, Fusion aims to champion a young, diverse America,” said Isaac Lee, CEO of Fusion. “Ron and the National Journal team are true thought leaders on this subject and understand how two of the largest demographic waves since the baby boom — millennials and Hispanics — are impacting so many sectors of society today, including politics.”
With minorities projected to reach majority status of the overall population by the early 2040s, and majority status in the under-18 population within this decade, both Fusion and “Next America” are focused on exploring and reporting on the dramatic effects of this demographic revolution as it reconfigures the face of America.
National Journal brings to the table its coverage of education, the economy, politics, immigration, and other domestic policy issues, as well as an extensive editorial and opinion section that features fresh and diverse voices from the changing American demographic. Fusion shares political and cultural coverage, as well as perspectives from their top reporters and analysts. As part of this partnership, Fusion journalists and hosts will participate in National Journal LIVE “Next America” events, andNational Journal editorial staff will participate in Fusion programming.
About National Journal‘s “Next America”:The “Next America” is National Journal‘s flagship product aimed at exploring how the changing demography is changing the national agenda. The project includes news, research, statistical analyses, and commentary from experts and organizations dedicated to exploring the political, economic, and social impacts of profound racial and cultural changes. “Next America” will be a repository for interactive and explanatory data-mined journalism and the fulcrum of National Journal‘s efforts to build a community of experts and advocates advancing the conversation on these subjects critical to evolving democracy.
About FusionFusion is a news, pop culture and satire TV and digital network. It will engage and champion a young, diverse, and inclusive America with a unique mix of smart and irreverent original reporting, lifestyle, and comedic content. Fusion launched in millions of households nationwide on October 28, 2013. Six major distributors are carrying the cable network including Cablevision, Charter, Cox, AT&T U-Verse, Verizon FiOS and Google Fiber. For more information about Fusion visit fusion.net or follow us on Twitter @ThisIsFusion and facebook.com/FusionNetwork. Fusion is a joint venture between Univision Communications Inc. and the Disney/ABC Television Network.
Emma V. Angerer
(202) 266-7405 Media Contact:
What We're Following See More »
Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:
- Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
- Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
- They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
- One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”
Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”
The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”
At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”