The Worst Congressional Comeback Attempt Ever?

Former Rep. David Rivera lost his House primary in Florida Tuesday after a campaign as unusual as the rest of his career.

Former Rep. David Rivera, R-Fla., on the campaign trail in 2010.
National Journal
Jack Fitzpatrick and Adam Wollner
Aug. 27, 2014, 1 a.m.

When Dav­id Rivera first ran for the Flor­ida state House in 2002, po­lice re­ports al­lege that he in­ten­tion­ally ran his car in­to a truck that was de­liv­er­ing his op­pon­ent’s fly­ers, which at­tacked Rivera’s char­ac­ter. His ex­plan­a­tion for ram­ming the truck off the busy Pal­metto Ex­press­way in Miami, minutes be­fore that day’s post of­fice dead­line? Rivera claimed he wanted to re­trieve his own fly­ers, which he said were also on the truck.

In the 12 years since, Rivera’s story has only got­ten more bizarre.

Rivera, who served in Con­gress from 2011 to 2013, of­fi­cially lost his hap­less comeback bid Tues­day, fall­ing short in the Re­pub­lic­an primary elec­tion in Flor­ida’s 26th Dis­trict. Miami-Dade County School Board mem­ber Car­los Cur­belo won the nom­in­a­tion with about half of the primary vote, more than five times what Rivera got (in fourth place) after an­oth­er roller coast­er of a cam­paign.

It may have been the worst con­gres­sion­al comeback at­tempt of all time. Rivera lost the nom­in­a­tion, but he dom­in­ated the head­lines. Throughout the race, he faced ques­tions about his role in an al­leged 2012 cam­paign fin­ance scheme, sparred with the me­dia, and even briefly sus­pen­ded his cam­paign for un­clear reas­ons””only to re­start it just two weeks be­fore the elec­tion. (Also, Rivera may have been cam­paign­ing dur­ing the “sus­pen­sion.”)

The latest chapter in Rivera’s saga star­ted in 2012, when The Miami Her­ald re­por­ted that, ac­cord­ing to cam­paign vendors, Rivera had fun­ded a Demo­crat­ic can­did­ate’s cam­paign, hop­ing that polit­ic­al new­comer Justin Lamar Ster­nad would beat Demo­crat Joe Gar­cia in the primary and then lose to Rivera in the gen­er­al elec­tion. Ac­cord­ing to The Her­ald’s sources, Rivera or­gan­ized and helped fund a soph­ist­ic­ated mail cam­paign for Ster­nad against Gar­cia””who won the Demo­crat­ic primary and then beat Rivera in 2012 as the al­leg­a­tions troubled the Re­pub­lic­an’s cam­paign. Rivera had faced scru­tiny (and nar­rowly avoided crim­in­al charges) for mis­us­ing cam­paign funds earli­er in his con­gres­sion­al term, but the “straw cam­paign” rev­el­a­tions brought his House ca­reer crash­ing down.

Ster­nad later pleaded guilty to cam­paign-fin­ance vi­ol­a­tions and was even­tu­ally sen­tenced to sev­en months in pris­on. In the mean­time, Ana Al­liegro, a friend of Rivera’s who man­aged Ster­nad’s cam­paign des­pite be­ing a Re­pub­lic­an, fled to Nicaragua and was ar­res­ted there and sent back to the U.S. in March of this year.

It was against this back­drop that Rivera de­cided to make an­oth­er run for Con­gress. It did not go well.


Less than two months after Al­liegro was ar­res­ted, Rivera an­nounced he would run for his old seat in Flor­ida’s 26th Con­gres­sion­al Dis­trict. He de­clined to an­swer ques­tions about the on­go­ing in­vest­ig­a­tion””or any­thing else””when fil­ing his pa­per­work, simply re­peat­ing, “You can email me” to an in­quis­it­ive Miami Her­ald re­port­er, who video­taped the en­counter. Rivera said he would only an­swer ques­tions in Span­ish.


Just one month in­to the cam­paign, Rivera found him­self in more leg­al trouble, which stemmed from his ten­ure as a mem­ber of the state House. A judge told the state eth­ics com­mis­sion that Rivera im­prop­erly billed both his cam­paign and his gov­ern­ment of­fice for travel and failed to file com­plete per­son­al fin­an­cial dis­clos­ure forms. The re­port ac­cused Rivera of break­ing a Flor­ida eth­ics law each year from 2005 to 2009.


After a little more than 10 weeks on the trail, Rivera sus­pen­ded his cam­paign, say­ing he would run for the state House in 2016 in­stead. Strangely, he cited a court de­cision that came down the day be­fore which said that two of the state’s con­gres­sion­al dis­tricts had to be re­drawn. The case did not res­ult in any changes to Rivera’s dis­trict.


Rivera sus­pen­ded his con­gres­sion­al cam­paign, but some voters still re­por­ted get­ting rob­ocalls from Rivera about the elec­tion. In one of the phone mes­sages, Rivera said, in Span­ish: “Your bal­lot to vote should have already ar­rived. And al­though the false cam­paign by The Miami Her­ald con­tin­ues, I will keep fight­ing for our best in­terests. That’s why I ask that you vote for a con­ser­vat­ive fight­er like me, Dav­id Rivera, for Con­gress.”

It’s un­clear how much Rivera spent on the calls or how he paid for them. A re­port filed with the Fed­er­al Elec­tion Com­mis­sion shows no money raised or spent by Rivera’s cam­paign from Ju­ly 1 to Aug. 6. Rivera’s cam­paign also re­por­ted hav­ing just over $1,000 in the bank and nearly $14,000 in debt at the time the rob­ocalls were in the field.

About a week after the rob­ocalls sur­faced””and two weeks out from Elec­tion Day””Rivera re­sumed cam­paign­ing. He par­ti­cip­ated in a tele­vised de­bate with the oth­er four GOP can­did­ates, but asked to be patched in from an early-vot­ing site, say­ing he would be cam­paign­ing nearby. The oth­er can­did­ates were un­able to hear his an­swers to ques­tions, and one of the de­bate’s hosts later pos­ted on Twit­ter that Rivera “did no cam­paign­ing” at the site.

Last week, Al­liegro pleaded guilty in the cam­paign fin­ance case, while Rivera was of­fi­cially named a co-con­spir­at­or in the scheme. Even though Rivera won’t be a mem­ber of Con­gress again any­time soon, don’t ex­pect his name to dis­ap­pear from the head­lines.

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 5196) }}

What We're Following See More »
Clapper: ISIS Will Try to Attack U.S. This Year
1 days ago

“Leaders of the Islamic State are determined to strike targets in the United States this year,” Director of National Intelligence James Clapper told a congressional panel today. Clapper added that “al-Qaida, from which the Islamic State spun off, remains an enemy and the U.S. will continue to see cyber threats from China, Russia and North Korea, which also is ramping up its nuclear program.”

CBC PAC to Endorse Clinton This Morning
5 hours ago

The Congressional Black Caucus PAC will formally endorse Hillary Clinton this morning, and “nearly a dozen CBC colleagues will descend on” South Carolina next week in advance of that state’s important primary. Rep. Jim Clyburn (D-SC), the highest ranking black member of Congress, reversed his earlier position of neutrality, saying he’ll make a decision “later in the week.” Rep. Keith Ellison (D-MN) has pointed out that the CBC PAC is not the same things as the CBC itself, while the Intercept notes that 11 of the 20 board members of the PAC are lobbyists.

Senate Votes 96-0 to Sanction North Korea
4 hours ago

In a unanimous vote Wednesday night, the Senate echoed the House’s move last month to stiffen sanctions against North Korea. The bill “would sanction anyone who engages in, facilitates or contributes to North Korea’s proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, arms-related materials, luxury goods, human rights abuses, activities undermining cyber security and the provision of materials for such activities.” Senate Democrats said they expect the president to sign the bill. In related news, after South Korea suspended operations at a jointly run power station in the North, Pyongyang declared the area a military zone and cut off a hotline between the two countries.

How Large Is Hillary Clinton’s Delegate Lead?
4 hours ago

Three hundred fifty-two, thanks to superdelegates pledged to Clinton, and the vagaries of the delegate allocation process in early states. Not bad, considering her results have been a virtual tie and a blowout loss.

RNC Chief Would Welcome Bloomberg
3 hours ago

“The lead­ers of the Re­pub­lic­an and Demo­crat­ic na­tion­al com­mit­tees on Wed­nes­day weighed in on the pro­spect of an in­de­pend­ent pres­id­en­tial run by” former New York City May­or Mi­chael Bloomberg (I). “DNC Chair­wo­man Debbie Wasser­man Schultz sug­ges­ted that the former New York City may­or’s pri­or­it­ies are already ‘well cared-for’ in the Demo­crat­ic plat­form, while RNC lead­er Re­ince Priebus wel­comed the idea, say­ing Bloomberg would si­phon off votes from the Demo­crat­ic can­did­ate.”