Which States Have Passed Gay Marriage Laws in the Past Year?

The Defense of Marriage Act was struck down on this date in 2013. What’s changed since then?

Same-sex marriage supporters demonstrate in front of the Supreme Court on March 27, 2013 in Washington, DC. The rights of married same-sex couples will come under scrutiny at the US Supreme Court on Wednesday in the second of two landmark cases being considered by the top judicial panel. After the nine justices mulled arguments on a California law that outlawed gay marriage on Tuesday, they will take up a challenge to the legality of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA). The 1996 law prevents couples who have tied the knot in nine states -- where same-sex marriage is legal -- from enjoying the same federal rights as heterosexual couples. 
AFP/Getty Images
Emma Roller
See more stories about...
Emma Roller
June 26, 2014, 1:10 a.m.

Thursday marks a mo­ment­ous an­niversary for gay-rights act­iv­ists. On this day one year ago, the Su­preme Court ruled Sec­tion 3 of the De­fense of Mar­riage Act un­con­sti­tu­tion­al, al­low­ing leg­ally mar­ried same-sex couples to re­ceive the same fed­er­al spous­al be­ne­fits as straight couples.

Now, those be­ne­fits ap­ply to more gay couples than ever. As The Wash­ing­ton Post‘s Philip Bump points out, nearly half of all gay Amer­ic­ans now live in states where same-sex mar­riage is leg­al. On Wed­nes­day, In­di­ana joined the 18 oth­er states where gay mar­riage is leg­al by strik­ing down its state ban. All told, sev­en states have suc­cess­fully leg­al­ized same-sex mar­riage in the past year: New Jer­sey, Hawaii, Illinois, New Mex­ico, Ore­gon, Pennsylvania, and now In­di­ana.

In states like Wis­con­sin, the status of gay couples’ right to marry is tied up in the courts. Utah’s de­cision may go all the way to the Su­preme Court. Oth­er states have passed milder laws, like re­cent de­cisions by Ken­tucky, Ten­ness­ee, and Ohio to re­cog­nize out-of-state mar­riages. To see up-to-date, state-by-state de­cisions, check out Na­tion­al Journ­al‘s com­pre­hens­ive map.

Here’s a timeline of gay-rights vic­tor­ies since DOMA was struck down last June:

Oct. 21, 2013: Gay couples in New Jer­sey start get­ting mar­ried after a court rul­ing goes in­to ef­fect.

(Kena Betan­cur/Getty Im­ages)

Nov. 13, 2013: Hawaii Gov. Neil Aber­crom­bie passes the Hawaii Mar­riage Equal­ity Act in­to law. Couples start get­ting mar­ried on Dec. 2, 2013.

Hawaii Gov. Neil Aber­crom­bie signed the bill leg­al­iz­ing same-sex mar­riage in­to law. (Craig Bar­ritt/Getty Im­ages)

Novem­ber 20, 2013: Illinois passes same-sex mar­riage le­gis­la­tion. The law went in­to ef­fect on June 1, 2014.

(Scott Olson/Getty Im­ages)

Dec. 19, 2013: The New Mex­ico Su­preme Court de­clares same-sex mar­riage leg­al.

Jan. 14, 2014: An Ok­lahoma judge strikes down the state’s gay-mar­riage ban, call­ing it “ar­bit­rary” and “ir­ra­tion­al.”

Feb. 14, 2014: A Vir­gin­ia judge tries to strike down the state’s same-sex mar­riage ban, though the state still defines mar­riage as between a man and a wo­man.

(Jay Paul/Getty Im­ages)

Feb. 27, 2014: A Texas judge struck down the state’s same-sex mar­riage ban, but that de­cision it­self was quickly struck down.

March 21, 2014: A Michigan judge struck down the state’s same-sex mar­riage ban, but that de­cision was in­def­in­itely sus­pen­ded by a fed­er­al ap­peals court.

(Bill Pugli­ano/Getty Im­ages)

May 9, 2014: An Arkan­sas judge un­suc­cess­fully strikes down the state’s gay-mar­riage ban.

May 13, 2014: An Idaho judge un­suc­cess­fully strikes down the state’s ban on same-sex mar­riages.

May 19, 2014: An Ore­gon judge suc­cess­fully strikes down the state’s same-sex mar­riage ban.

May 20, 2014: A Pennsylvania judge suc­cess­fully strikes down the state’s gay-mar­riage ban.

June 7, 2014: A Wis­con­sin judge over­turned the state’s same-sex mar­riage ban, al­low­ing couples to get mar­riage li­censes for a week un­til the de­cision was stayed on June 13. Mar­riages have since been hal­ted.

June 25, 2014: A fed­er­al ap­peals court struck down Utah’s ban on same-sex mar­riage — the first time a fed­er­al ap­peals court weighed in on the is­sue at the state level.

(George Frey/Getty Im­ages)

June 25, 2014: A judge in In­di­ana ruled the state’s gay-mar­riage ban un­con­sti­tu­tion­al, al­low­ing same-sex couples in the state to im­me­di­ately start re­ceiv­ing mar­riage li­censes.

Many of these re­cent rul­ings are likely to be­come tied up in the courts for some time. At­tor­neys gen­er­al in states like Utah and Wis­con­sin have already be­gun the ap­peals pro­cess to re­in­state their states’ re­spect­ive bans. But for many gay couples, the mo­ment­ous de­cision the Su­preme Court handed down one year ago was just the be­gin­ning of the good news.

What We're Following See More »
“CLINTON MUST BECOME THE NEXT PRESIDENT”
Bernie Sanders Seeks to Unite the Party
5 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Instead of his usual stump speech, Bernie Sanders tonight threw his support behind Hillary Clinton, providing a clear contrast between Clinton and GOP nominee Donald Trump on the many issues he used to discuss in his campaign stump speeches. Sanders spoke glowingly about the presumptive Democratic nominee, lauding her work as first lady and as a strong advocate for women and the poor. “We need leadership in this country which will improve the lives of working families, the children, the elderly, the sick and the poor,” he said. “Hillary Clinton will make a great president, and I am proud to stand with her tonight."

“MUST NEVER BE PRESIDENT”
Elizabeth Warren Goes After Donald Trump
5 hours ago
THE DETAILS

In a stark contrast from Michelle Obama's uplifting speech, Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren spoke about the rigged system plaguing Americans before launching into a full-throated rebuke of GOP nominee Donald Trump. Trump is "a man who has never sacrificed anything for anyone," she claimed, before saying he "must never be president of the United States." She called him divisive and selfish, and said the American people won't accept his "hate-filled America." In addition to Trump, Warren went after the Republican Party as a whole. "To Republicans in Congress who said no, this November the American people are coming for you," she said.

FLOTUS OFFERS STRONG ENDORSEMENT OF CLINTON
Michelle Obama: “I Trust” Hillary Clinton
6 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"In this election, and every election, it's about who will have the power to shape our children for the next four or eight years of their lives," Michelle Obama said. "There is only one person who I trust with that responsibility … and that is our friend Hillary Clinton." In a personal and emotional speech, Michelle Obama spoke about the effect that angry oppositional rhetoric had on her children and how she chose to raise them. "When they go low, we go high," Obama said she told her children about dealing with bullies. Obama stayed mostly positive, but still offered a firm rebuke of Donald Trump, despite never once uttering his name. "The issues a president faces cannot be boiled down to 140 characters," she said.

SANDERS BACKER CONFRONTS STUBBORN SANDERS SUPPORTERS
Sarah Silverman to Bernie or Bust: “You’re Being Ridiculous”
6 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Many Bernie Sanders delegates have spent much of the first day of the Democratic National Convention resisting unity, booing at mentions of Hillary Clinton and often chanting "Bernie! Bernie!" Well, one of the most outspoken Bernie Sanders supporters just told them to take a seat. "To the Bernie-or-bust people: You're being ridiculous," said comedian Sarah Silverman in a brief appearance at the Convention, minutes after saying that she would proudly support Hillary Clinton for president.

‘INEXCUSABLE REMARKS’
DNC Formally Apologizes to Bernie Sanders
11 hours ago
THE LATEST

The Democratic National Committee issued a formal apology to Bernie Sanders today, after leaked emails showed staffers trying to sabotage his presidential bid. "On behalf of everyone at the DNC, we want to offer a deep and sincere apology to Senator Sanders, his supporters, and the entire Democratic Party for the inexcusable remarks made over email," DNC officials said in the statement. "These comments do not reflect the values of the DNC or our steadfast commitment to neutrality during the nominating process. The DNC does not—and will not—tolerate disrespectful language exhibited toward our candidates."

Source:
×