Nobody should assume that the new additions to House leadership this summer will ever face anything like the primary trouble that outgoing House Majority Leader Eric Cantor just suffered. But Cantor’s loss paints a target on his prospective replacements, whose future primaries may be contested with more spirit than the past ones.
All of them represent safely Republican districts, but any primary issues that have flared in the past, including immigration, could rise to a new level under the magnification of party leadership in future years.
Immigration, the issue that economics professor Dave Brat trumpeted in his winning primary campaign over Cantor in Virginia, has already played a prominent role in House Majority Whip Kevin McCarthy’s local politics this term, even though the potential majority leader is running unopposed. In December, McCarthy faced protests, sit-ins, hunger strikes, and a 285-mile “pilgrimage” to his district office by pro-reform protesters. The opposition was ubiquitous, including “immigrants, priests, CEOs, police officers, and Republican donors” in Bakersfield over his immigration stance, according to The Wall Street Journal. “I can’t go anywhere in the community without being protested,” he told the newspaper. “I don’t see how that is productive.”
But protests on the other side of the issue included antagonistic TV advertising from activists who thought McCarthy’s stance on immigration was too soft. As Roy Beck, the CEO of the anti-immigration group Numbers USA, directed the group’s members to call McCarthy and oppose legislation that provided “amnesty” to undocumented immigrants, the group Californians for Population Stabilization aired ads saying McCarthy wanted to “legalize 11 million illegal aliens.” Bakersfield tea-party activists said immigration-reform progress in the House could lead to an attack on McCarthy’s right.
American Action Network, a pro-reform group, ended up deciding to buy its own TV time to defend McCarthy. The ad said McCarthy’s “conservative approach” on immigration included greater border security.
Besides his well-documented attention to his district, though, McCarthy has another thing working in his favor to keep immigration — or any other issue — from becoming a primary problem: California’s all-party, top-two primaries make it harder to challenge Democrats from the left or Republicans from the right.
Those looking to replace McCarthy as majority whip, pending his move up to the majority leader’s office, are in similarly safe Republican seats. And their past experience with primaries has been notably spare, offering few hints on what any future challenger would do if their leadership roles were to anger the GOP base.
Rep. Steve Scalise has had little primary opposition in Louisiana; in fact, nobody has declared an interest in challenging the Republican Study Committee chairman so far this year. He has collected more than $1 million in campaign contributions, just in case.
Meanwhile, Rep. Peter Roskam has never had a primary challenger as a congressman. Even when he was first elected in 2006, Roskam actually won the GOP nomination unopposed in his Illinois district, having scared off other potential hopefuls.
As for underdog Rep. Marlin Stutzman, he easily beat two challengers for his party’s nomination this year, after facing no opposition in the Indiana Republican ranks at all in 2012. He was appointed to the House ballot in 2010, replacing Rep. Mark Souder after the primary — when Stutzman had finished as a runner-up to Dan Coats for the GOP Senate nomination. In the process, though, he won the support of then-Sen. Jim DeMint and RedState editor Erick Erickson, who called Stutzman “a conservative rock star.”
Yet if there’s anything we learned from Cantor’s loss, tides can change quickly on lawmakers, especially when their attention turns to Washington — and, more importantly, when someone makes the effort to test them.
“I think McCarthy is not as popular as his numbers show,” McCarthy’s 2012 Republican challenger, auto-parts store manager Eric Parker told the Bakersfield Californian. “He has not had any competition. So is he really popular or is he the only game in town? We’re going to find out.”
The results aren’t always, or even often, dramatic. McCarthy carried his all-party primary that year with more than 70 percent of the vote.
What We're Following See More »
When it comes to name-calling among America's upper echelon of politicians, there may be perhaps no greater spat than the one currently going on between Sen. Elizabeth Warren and Donald Trump. While receiving an award Tuesday night, she continued a months-long feud with the presumptive GOP presidential nominee. Calling him a "small, insecure moneygrubber" who probably doesn't know three things about Dodd-Frank, she said he "will NEVER be president of the United States," according to her prepared remarks."We don't know what Trump pays in taxes because he is the first presidential nominee in 40 years to refuse to disclose his tax returns. Maybe he’s just a lousy businessman who doesn’t want you to find out that he’s worth a lot less money than he claims." It follows a long-line of Warren attacks over Twitter, Facebook and in interviews that Trump is a sexist, racist, narcissistic loser. In reply, Trump has called Warren either "goofy" or "the Indian"—referring to her controversial assertion of her Native American heritage.
The House on Tuesday voted 403-12 "to pass an overhaul to the nation’s chemical safety standards for the first time in four decades. The Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act aims to answer years of complaints that the Environmental Protection Agency lacks the necessary authority to oversee and control the thousands of chemicals being produced and sold in the United States. It also significantly clamps down on states’ authorities, in an effort to stop a nationwide patchwork of chemical laws that industry says is difficult to deal with."
"Leaders of the Republican Party have begun internal deliberations over making fundamental changes to the way its presidential nominees are chosen, a recognition that the chaotic process that played out this year is seriously flawed and helped exacerbate tensions within the party." Among the possible changes: forbidding independent voters to cast ballots in Republican primaries, and "doubling the number of early states to eight."
Citing the unpredictable nature of this primary season and the possible leverage they could bring at the convention, John Kasich is hanging onto his 161 delegates. "Kasich sent personal letters Monday to Republican officials in the 16 states and the District of Columbia where he won delegates, requesting that they stay bound to him in accordance with party rules."
Bernie Sanders "signed a letter Tuesday morning requesting a full and complete check and recanvass of the election results in Kentucky ... where he trails Hillary Clinton by less than one-half of 1 percent of the vote. The Sanders campaign said it has asked the Kentucky secretary of state to have election officials review electronic voting machines and absentee ballots from last week's primary in each of the state's 120 counties.