The Economics Professor Versus the Sociology Professor

David Brat’s win Tuesday night offers a modern fable of American politics.

David Brat (L) and Jack Trammell (R), professors and opponents.
National Journal
Emma Roller
June 11, 2014, 9:37 a.m.

Dav­id Brat’s aca­dem­ic web­site is bordered with por­traits of four eco­nom­ists and one theo­lo­gian: Adam Smith, John Calv­in, John Maynard Keynes, and Friedrich Hayek.

Brat, who chairs the eco­nom­ics and busi­ness de­part­ment at Ran­dolph-Ma­con Col­lege, can add a new line to his CV: de­feat­ing House Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Eric Can­tor in a shock­ing up­set Tues­day night.

But to as­sume Can­tor’s seat rep­res­ent­ing Vir­gin­ia’s 7th Dis­trict, Brat first has to de­feat his Demo­crat­ic op­pon­ent — and fel­low pro­fess­or. Jack Tram­mell, a so­ci­ology pro­fess­or and the dir­ect­or of dis­ab­il­ity ser­vices, has taught at Ran­dolph-Ma­con Col­lege — a 1,300-stu­dent Meth­od­ist col­lege out­side Rich­mond — for more than a dec­ade. Four oth­er Ran­dolph-Ma­con pro­fess­ors have gone on to serve in Con­gress, in­clud­ing Randy For­bes, who cur­rently rep­res­ents Vir­gin­ia’s 4th Dis­trict.

In so­ci­ology, edu­ca­tion is of­ten cham­pioned as the best path to a vi­brant so­ci­ety — an idea Tram­mell clearly sub­scribes to. He is run­ning on a plat­form of col­lege ac­cess, stu­dent-loan for­give­ness, and spe­cial-edu­ca­tion re­form. In 2012, Tram­mell pub­lished a book, The Rich­mond Slave Trade: The Eco­nom­ic Back­bone of the Old Domin­ion. (More re­cently, he has planned to write a vam­pire nov­el.) Tram­mell’s an­cest­or, Thomas Tram­mell, was an in­den­tured ser­vant when he ar­rived in Fair­fax in 1671.

Brat joined the fac­ulty at Ran­dolph-Ma­con in 1996 after re­ceiv­ing his Ph.D. in eco­nom­ics at Amer­ic­an Uni­versity. Since then, he’s taught classes on mi­cro- and mac­roe­co­nom­ics, pub­lic fin­ance, and busi­ness eth­ics. And he coau­thored a pa­per titled, “An Ana­lys­is of the Mor­al Found­a­tions in Ayn Rand”. Back in Janu­ary, Brat told the Na­tion­al Re­view that while he doesn’t con­sider him­self a Ran­di­an, “he has been in­flu­enced by At­las Shrugged and ap­pre­ci­ates Rand’s case for hu­man free­dom and free mar­kets.”

Brat’s aca­dem­ic back­ground is some­what un­usu­al for a tea-party can­did­ate — the Can­tor cam­paign even tried to paint Brat as a lib­er­al egg­head in one tele­vi­sion ad. And, speak­ing to Chuck Todd on Tues­day night, Brat de­fen­ded not rais­ing the min­im­um wage as only a schol­ar of the Aus­tri­an School of eco­nom­ics would (al­though he was caught a bit off-guard by Todd’s policy ques­tions):

“Min­im­um wage, no, I’m a free-mar­ket guy,” Brat re­spon­ded. “Our labor mar­kets right now are already dis­tor­ted from too many reg­u­la­tions. I think Cato es­tim­ates there’s $2 tril­lion of reg­u­lat­ory prob­lems and then throw Obama­care on top of that, the work hours is 30 hours a week. You can only hire 50 people. There’s just dis­tor­tion after dis­tor­tion after dis­tor­tion, and we won­der why our labor mar­kets are broken.”

The idea of a Re­pub­lic­an eco­nom­ics pro­fess­or fa­cing off against a Demo­crat­ic so­ci­ology pro­fess­or presents a near-per­fect mi­cro­cosm of Amer­ic­an polit­ic­al thought. What mat­ters most in gov­ernance — the good of the mar­ket or the good of so­ci­ety? Should gov­ern­ment serve to keep the free mar­ket as un­in­hib­ited as pos­sible, or to im­pose checks on the mar­ket to pro­tect cit­izens? Is edu­ca­tion or en­tre­pren­eur­ship a more im­port­ant path to in­di­vidu­al and col­lect­ive suc­cess? These are ques­tions ripe for a Poli-Sci 101 dis­cus­sion.

Con­sid­er­ing how solidly Re­pub­lic­an the dis­trict is, Brat is likely to win. But even if he loses in Novem­ber, Tram­mell can still hold his RateMyPro­fess­or score over Brat.

What We're Following See More »
STAYING RELEVANT TIL 2020?
Rubio May Run for Reelection After All
9 hours ago
WHY WE CARE
SOCIAL ISSUES ROIL CONGRESS AGAIN
LGBT Amendment Sinks Energy and Water Approps
11 hours ago
THE LATEST

The House voted down the otherwise uncontroversial Energy and Water appropriations bill Thursday after Democrats succeeded in attaching an amendment affirming LGBT job discrimination protections for military contractors. More than 40 Republicans supported the amendment, but when it came to vote on the bill, 130 Republicans joined all but six Democrats to sink the bill. Speaker Paul Ryan said Democrats voting against the bill after securing the amendment shows their intention was to scuttle the process. Democrats, however, blamed other so-called poison-pill amendments for their votes against the bill. Nonetheless, Ryan said he intends to continue the appropriations process.

AKNOWLEDGING THE INEVITABLE
UAW: Time to Unite Behind Hillary
12 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"It's about time for unity," said UAW President Dennis Williams. "We're endorsing Hillary Clinton. She's gotten 3 million more votes than Bernie, a million more votes than Donald Trump. She's our nominee." He called Sanders "a great friend of the UAW" while saying Trump "does not support the economic security of UAW families." Some 28 percent of UAW members indicated their support for Trump in an internal survey.

Source:
AP KEEPING COUNT
Trump Clinches Enough Delegates for the Nomination
14 hours ago
THE LATEST

"Donald Trump on Thursday reached the number of delegates needed to clinch the Republican nomination for president, completing an unlikely rise that has upended the political landscape and sets the stage for a bitter fall campaign. Trump was put over the top in the Associated Press delegate count by a small number of the party's unbound delegates who told the AP they would support him at the convention."

Source:
TRUMP FLOATED IDEA ON JIMMY KIMMEL’S SHOW
Trump/Sanders Debate Before California Primary?
15 hours ago
THE LATEST
×