The Big Game: Federal Government vs. the NFL

More than ever before, Congress and the White House are challenging football.

President Obama throws a football at Soldier Field in Chicago.
National Journal
Kaveh Waddell
May 30, 2014, 7:33 a.m.

In re­cent months, polit­ics and Amer­ic­an foot­ball have been clash­ing in­creas­ingly of­ten. Con­gress and the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion have found them­selves on the op­pos­ite side from the NFL over is­sues ran­ging from health con­cerns and dop­ing to a team’s ra­cist name and the league’s non­profit status.

Pres­id­ent Obama is the most re­cent entrant to the fray. Fol­low­ing a smat­ter­ing of com­ments over the course of the two years that hin­ted at his con­cern over con­cus­sions in foot­ball, Obama brought to­geth­er lead­ers of na­tion­al sports leagues at the White House on Thursday for a Healthy Kids and Safe Sports Con­cus­sion Sum­mit. At the event, the pres­id­ent an­nounced nu­mer­ous part­ner­ships with sports or­gan­iz­a­tions, in­clud­ing a $30 mil­lion pro­gram in con­junc­tion with the NCAA and the De­fense De­part­ment for con­cus­sion edu­ca­tion, and a $25 mil­lion pledge from the NFL to fund a vari­ety of strategies to re­duce con­cus­sion rates. While the con­fer­ence fo­cused on the safety of young people, the NFL could be wor­ried that fu­ture gen­er­a­tions of pro foot­ball play­ers (or their par­ents) might shy away from the sport in fa­vor of safer pas­times.

Obama has re­marked on safety in foot­ball be­fore. Last year, he told The New Re­pub­lic, “I think that those of us who love the sport are go­ing to have to wrestle with the fact that it will prob­ably change gradu­ally to try to re­duce some of the vi­ol­ence.” In a con­ver­sa­tion with The New York­er in Janu­ary of this year, Obama said out­right, “I would not let my son play pro foot­ball.”

The com­plaints over safety aren’t com­ing out of nowhere. In Au­gust 2013, un­der na­tion­al scru­tiny, the NFL settled a law­suit brought against it by former play­ers for $765 mil­lion. The sum will be ap­plied to­ward med­ic­al ex­ams and re­search, lit­ig­a­tion ex­penses, and com­pens­a­tion for af­fected play­ers.

Months after the law­suit settled, Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., in­tro­duced a bill to strip the NFL of its non­profit status. Un­der cur­rent law, the league is ex­empt from taxes be­cause it qual­i­fies as a 501(c)(6) or­gan­iz­a­tion along with “busi­ness leagues, cham­bers of com­merce, real es­tate boards, and boards of trade,” ac­cord­ing to the IRS. A fea­ture in The At­lantic out­lined the big-tick­et costs that NFL teams pass on to tax­pay­ers.

Most re­cently, the foot­ball team in Wash­ing­ton has been un­der fire for re­fus­ing to change a name that is a ra­cist slur. A band of 50 Demo­crat­ic sen­at­ors came to­geth­er to sign a let­ter sponsored by Sen. Maria Can­t­well, D-Wash., ur­ging the com­mis­sion­er of the NFL, Ro­ger Goodell, to throw his weight be­hind a name change for the team.

On Thursday, the NFL tried to strike back with an ill-fated Twit­ter cam­paign. The of­fi­cial ac­count of the Wash­ing­ton foot­ball team tweeted an at­tempt to rally sup­port be­hind its name and send a clear mes­sage to Sen­ate Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Harry Re­id, D-Nev.:

Think­Pro­gress com­piled some of the fal­lout that the com­mu­nic­a­tions team be­hind the tweet may not have an­ti­cip­ated, made up of replies that ranged from “ob­stin­ate ig­nor­ance” to “overt ra­cism.”

Once an es­cape from polit­ics, foot­ball — the most pop­u­lar sport in the U.S. for the 30th year run­ning — is be­com­ing in­creas­ingly tangled up with a Con­gress suf­fer­ing from re­cord-break­ing low ap­prov­al rat­ings. The pace only seems to be in­creas­ing: The gov­ern­ment and the NFL may re­main strange bed­fel­lows for some time.

What We're Following See More »
A DARK CLOUD OVER TRUMP?
Snowstorm Could Impact Primary Turnout
2 days ago
THE LATEST

A snowstorm is supposed to hit New Hampshire today and “linger into Primary Tuesday.” GOP consultant Ron Kaufman said lower turnout should help candidates who have spent a lot of time in the state tending to retail politicking. Donald Trump “has acknowledged that he needs to step up his ground-game, and a heavy snowfall could depress his figures relative to more organized candidates.”

Source:
IN CASE OF EMERGENCY
A Shake-Up in the Offing in the Clinton Camp?
2 days ago
THE DETAILS

Anticipating a primary loss in New Hampshire on Tuesday, Hillary and Bill Clinton “are considering staffing and strategy changes” to their campaign. Sources tell Politico that the Clintons are likely to layer over top officials with experienced talent, rather than fire their staff en masse.

Source:
THE LAST ROUND OF NEW HAMPSHIRE POLLS
Trump Is Still Ahead, but Who’s in Second?
1 days ago
THE LATEST

We may not be talking about New Hampshire primary polls for another three-and-a-half years, so here goes:

  • American Research Group’s tracking poll has Donald Trump in the lead with 30% support, followed by Marco Rubio and John Kasich tying for second place at 16%. On the Democratic side, Bernie Sanders leads Hillary Clinton 53%-41%.
  • The 7 News/UMass Lowell tracking poll has Trump way out front with 34%, followed by Rubio and Ted Cruz with 13% apiece. Among the Democrats, Sanders is in front 56%-40%.
  • A Gravis poll puts Trump ahead with 28%, followed by Kasich with 17% and Rubio with 15%.
IT’S ALL ABOUT SECOND PLACE
CNN Calls the Primary for Sanders and Trump
1 days ago
THE LATEST

Well that didn’t take long. CNN has already declared Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump the winners of the New Hampshire primary, leaving the rest of the candidates to fight for the scraps. Five minutes later, the Associated Press echoed CNN’s call.

Source:
×