Hillary Clinton Meditates on ‘Choices’ in New Video”“But Not Her Own

In the promotional video for her upcoming book, she refers to economic inequality as a “cancer.”

A still frame from a video promoting Hillary Clinton's new book.
National Journal
Alex Seitz-Wald
See more stories about...
Alex Seitz-Wald
May 28, 2014, 8:11 a.m.

In a new video to pro­mote her up­com­ing book, Hil­lary Clin­ton dis­cusses the dif­fi­cult de­cisions faced by both in­di­vidu­als and coun­tries, while avoid­ing her own dif­fi­cult de­cision about wheth­er to run for pres­id­ent in 2016.

“I really feel that every­body has hard choices in their lives. And some have a lot more than oth­ers, to be hon­est,” the former sec­ret­ary of State says. “And I saw the same thing with na­tions and lead­ers. Coun­tries have hard choices.”

“The more I thought about it, I thought, really, choice is at the core of what kinds of people we want to be and what kind of coun­tries we want to have,” she adds.

The video, re­leased on the Face­book page of her pub­lish­er, Si­mon & Schuster, is the latest phase of the care­fully stage-man­aged rol­lout of Hard Choices, her new mem­oir. 

The first ex­cerpt came on Moth­er’s Day in Vogue magazine, while the pub­lish­er re­leased a second ex­cerpt Tues­day to fans who had signed up to re­ceive on­line up­dates. The hype-build­ing has been suc­cess­ful, selling out the 1 mil­lion cop­ies of the book’s first print­ing be­fore it even be­comes form­ally avail­able. The book will fo­cus on her time as sec­ret­ary of State.

Clin­ton, show­ing that she’s in touch with the way the polit­ic­al winds are blow­ing in today’s Demo­crat­ic Party, goes on to refer to the “can­cer of in­equal­ity,” say­ing we need to “re­store prosper­ity here at home.” “That doesn’t hap­pen by ac­ci­dent or by wish­ing for it, or en­ga­ging in ideo­lo­gic­al or rhet­or­ic­al battles,” she says. “It hap­pens be­cause people come to­geth­er and make a series of choices, in­clud­ing some hard choices.”

Clin­ton’s book hits stores June 10. A book-tour sched­ule is already tak­ing shape, with stops planned so far in Ar­ling­ton, Va.; Aus­tin, Texas; and San Fran­cisco, along with two stops in Canada.

In the video, she goes on to say that the book will in­clude “be­hind-the-scenes in­sights” from her time as sec­ret­ary of State, in­clud­ing her re­la­tion­ship with Pres­id­ent Obama.

The one choice she doesn’t men­tion is her own. She ex­pect to an­nounce a de­cision on a pres­id­en­tial bid some­time after the 2014 midterm elec­tions.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
8 hours ago
NATIONAL JOURNAL AFTER DARK

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Source:
STATE VS. FEDERAL
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
8 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
8 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
8 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
9 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”

Source:
×