Sarah Palin Is Right

The media has a double standard for covering female candidates.

NEAR JUNIPER CREEK, ALASKA, SEPTEMBER 04 2010: Sarah Palin hunts caribou near Juniper Creek, in the toundra north of the Arctic Circle (photo Gilles Mingasson).
National Journal
Emma Roller
May 20, 2014, 10:18 a.m.

In 2008, a con­spir­acy the­ory about Sarah Pal­in — then a can­did­ate for vice pres­id­ent — was born. The the­ory: Pal­in was not in fact the moth­er of her then-in­fant son, Trig — her daugh­ter Bris­tol was. The blog­ger An­drew Sul­li­van fed in­to the the­ory, and it was re­sur­rec­ted in an aca­dem­ic pa­per by a Ken­tucky journ­al­ism pro­fess­or in 2011. (Salon has since thor­oughly de­bunked the Trig Pal­in con­spir­acy the­ory.)

Now, Hil­lary Clin­ton is on the re­ceiv­ing end of her own health-re­lated cov­er-up con­spir­acy the­ory — and Pal­in is us­ing the story to skew­er the me­dia and il­lus­trate what she sees as a double stand­ard for how Demo­crat­ic and Re­pub­lic­an fe­male can­did­ates get covered.

Some back­ground: In Decem­ber 2012, Clin­ton was treated for a blood clot on her brain after suf­fer­ing a con­cus­sion. Clin­ton re­covered and was giv­en a clean bill of health, but Karl Rove re­mained skep­tic­al.

“Thirty days in the hos­pit­al? And when she re­appears, she’s wear­ing glasses that are only for people who have trau­mat­ic brain in­jury? We need to know what’s up with that,” Rove al­legedly said at a con­fer­ence in Los Angeles.

After cries of “Sex­ism!” from me­dia out­lets, Rove walked back his state­ment, but he was not alone in his think­ing. Re­ince Priebus, the chair­man of the Re­pub­lic­an Na­tion­al Com­mit­tee, de­fen­ded Rove’s com­ments and said the health ques­tion is “fair game.”

Like it or not, Clin­ton will have to deal with these kinds of ques­tions for the next two years, at a min­im­um. And judging by Pal­in’s re­sponse, the pain doesn’t fade over time. In a highly sar­cast­ic Face­book post Monday night, Pal­in poin­ted out me­dia hy­po­crisy for de­fend­ing Clin­ton against Rove’s com­ments.

“Demo­crats are right — scour­ing re­cords of a fe­male can­did­ate is just polit­ics of per­son­al de­struc­tion, and for the me­dia to en­gage in it would be un­fair, un­eth­ic­al, and ab­so­lutely UN­PRE­CED­EN­TED. You can’t probe a wo­man like that be­cause, well, it’s a war on wo­men!” Pal­in wrote.

“Amer­ica, you de­serve fair and con­sist­ent cov­er­age of rel­ev­ant is­sues be­fore de­cid­ing a Pres­id­en­tial/Vice Pres­id­en­tial tick­et, so have faith the agenda-less me­dia will re­fuse to push whis­pers and wildly in­ac­cur­ate in­form­a­tion about a par­tis­an politi­cian’s body part,” she con­tin­ued.

It’s less likely that Pal­in is de­fend­ing Hil­lary Clin­ton against per­ceived sex­ist com­ments, and much more likely that she’s just tak­ing an­oth­er pot­shot at the Lamestream Me­dia. Of course, some polit­ic­al journ­al­ists did re­buke the Trig the­ory — namely BuzzFeed Ed­it­or-in-Chief Ben Smith, who was at Politico at the time, along with Salon‘s Justin El­li­ott.

But un­like with the Trig The­ory, nearly every re­port­er cov­er­ing the 2008 cam­paign bought in­to an­oth­er nar­rat­ive — one about Pal­in’s men­tal fac­ulties. Pal­in was por­trayed, from Katie Cour­ic to Sat­urday Night Live,  as a clue­less bimbo, and that im­age lives on in Ju­li­anne Moore’s (ex­cel­lent) por­tray­al of Pal­in in HBO’s Game Change. 

Was it fair to por­tray Pal­in as in­ex­per­i­enced and un­fit for of­fice? Yes. But that’s far dif­fer­ent from the im­age the me­dia cul­tiv­ated. Cov­er­ing Pal­in as a bimbo was an un­ques­tioned giv­en. One is a val­id point, the oth­er is a ca­ri­ca­ture.

Of course, Hil­lary Clin­ton has suffered her fair share of sex­ist cov­er­age. After Bill Clin­ton’s af­fair with Mon­ica Lew­in­sky came to light, pun­dits spec­u­lated that Hil­lary — that fri­gid harpy! — had driv­en her hus­band to in­fi­del­ity. More re­cently, the idea that Chelsea Clin­ton be­came preg­nant to boost her moth­er’s fa­vor­ab­il­ity was al­most laugh­ably sex­ist. Pal­in and Clin­ton can sym­path­ize on that point.

The ques­tion Rove raised was a seem­ingly in­no­cent one — does Hil­lary have the men­tal stam­ina to be pres­id­ent? Mean­while, Sul­li­van’s the­ory about Trig Pal­in’s true par­ent­age was more of a sug­ges­tion that Pal­in was will­ing to go to despic­able lengths to main­tain her pub­lic im­age as a whole­some folk lead­er. Rove was con­cern trolling; Sul­li­van was just plain trolling.

Now, in a dar­ing feat of Nar­rat­ive Re­appro­pri­ation, Pal­in is call­ing Hil­lary Clin­ton dumb while ad­mon­ish­ing the me­dia for do­ing the same thing to her in 2008. “Ap­par­ently, Demo­crats de­mand their next chosen one’s brain must be ab­sent,” she wrote in her Face­book post.

It’s the type of quick-change polit­ic­al man­euv­er­ing that takes a healthy sense of irony to un­der­stand.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
CITIZENS UNITED PT. 2?
Movie Based on ‘Clinton Cash’ to Debut at Cannes
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."

Source:
×