One small governor’s race has turned into a cattle call for potential 2016 presidential candidates: Nebraska.
Specifically, one candidate in the Cornhusker State is getting outsized attention from talked-about Republican presidential contenders. Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker, Indiana Gov. Mike Pence, 2012 vice presidential nominee Paul Ryan, and Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas have all endorsed Omaha businessman Pete Ricketts ahead of Tuesday’s primary.
As potential candidates work to woo Republican mega-donors, the contest offers presidential contenders entrée with a billionaire sugar daddy of the most literal variety: Joe Ricketts, the TD Ameritrade-founding, Chicago Cubs-owning billionaire who also happens to be the candidate’s father, has spent tens of millions of dollars supporting Republicans across the country, and his support in 2016 is already much-sought.
Cruz, Walker and Ryan are among those who have met with Joe Ricketts over the past year, National Journal reported in February, and Ricketts has also been courted by Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky, former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, and New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie.
The endorsements also connect to the Rickettses’ past political beneficence. The family’s super PAC, the Ending Spending Action Fund, spent over $160,000 in support of Cruz during his contested 2012 U.S. Senate primary, and the group put $245,000 toward Walker’s recall election the same year. Joe Ricketts personally donated an additional $100,000 to Walker, and Pete Ricketts and his brother Todd Ricketts, who now runs Ending Spending, gave an additional $75,000 to pro-Walker efforts.
Filings with the Indiana Secretary of State’s Office and the Federal Elections Commission show the elder Ricketts also made personal contributions to both Pence’s and Ryan’s political campaigns in 2012. All told, the Ending Spending PAC has raised and spent roughly $25 million since it was first launched in 2010, a big slice of which went to pro-Mitt Romney activities in 2012, and the family has given millions more on candidates and PACs across the country.
Pete Ricketts has also received backing from former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin and Nebraska native and former vice president Dick Cheney.
“There’s no doubt there’s a correlation between national figures and the Ricketts family’s help and the endorsements that he’s received,” said Sam Fischer, a longtime Nebraska political consultant who’s currently working for one of Ricketts’s primary opponents, state Sen. Beau McCoy.
Money may not be the only motivating factor. Former Nebraska Republican Party director Phil Young thinks the endorsements are just as much about wanting to be on the right side of a race whose winner could offer early political support during presidential primary season. The race is, after all one of few gubernatorial contests with an open GOP primary in 2014. “It probably doesn’t hurt down the road to make friends with people who have a decent amount of wealth, but I don’t know if that’s their only political, self-serving reason. Getting a critical mass of support is actually just as important in those presidential races,” said Young.
Ultimately, the endorsements may be more about 2016 and the people giving them than about 2014 and the person receiving them. Pete Ricketts’s camp is certainly happy to have support, but it focuses more on the locals: One of Ricketts’s final TV ads features a pitch from former Nebraska Gov. Kay Orr. “While Pete appreciates the support of Govs. Palin, Walker, and Pence, and Sen. Cruz and Rep. Ryan ““ his Nebraska endorsements are prominent in his campaign,” said spokesman Josh Moenning.
Ricketts and Attorney General Jon Bruning are the leading Republicans in the gubernatorial primary, and Bruning nabbed the biggest name for his side: Term-limited Gov. Dave Heineman pledged his support to the A.G. in the last days before the primary. Those involved in the campaigns saying internal polls show the two running neck-and-neck with many voters still undecided. That could potentially open the door for McCoy or state Auditor Mike Foley, especially since few issues separate the field. “Ted Cruz and Paul Ryan and Mike Pence, they don’t know the difference between Pete Ricketts and Jon Bruning or any of the other candidates in this race,” said Bruning campaign manager Jordan McGrain. “They know his last name is Ricketts.”
This isn’t the first time Bruning and the Ricketts clan have tangled. In 2012, Bruning was the front-runner for Nebraska’s open U.S. Senate seat, but he lost a bitter primary involving multiple outside groups ““ including Ending Spending, which lined up against him. Bruning has repeatedly accused Ricketts of funneling money to groups running outside TV ads against him in this year’s race. If Bruning wins on Tuesday, it would be a coup against a family that has twice attempted to defeat him.
And if Ricketts wins? No candidate forgets who stood with them.
- 1 The Rising Stars to Watch at the Democratic National Convention
- 2 How Politics Breaks Our Brains, and How We Can Put Them Back Together
- 3 Is Virginia Becoming a Liberal State? Some Democrats Are Betting on It.
- 4 Climate Scientists Press Enviros to Support Nuclear Power
- 5 Some Smiles in Tough Times for Nuclear Power
What We're Following See More »
Instead of his usual stump speech, Bernie Sanders tonight threw his support behind Hillary Clinton, providing a clear contrast between Clinton and GOP nominee Donald Trump on the many issues he used to discuss in his campaign stump speeches. Sanders spoke glowingly about the presumptive Democratic nominee, lauding her work as first lady and as a strong advocate for women and the poor. “We need leadership in this country which will improve the lives of working families, the children, the elderly, the sick and the poor,” he said. “Hillary Clinton will make a great president, and I am proud to stand with her tonight."
In a stark contrast from Michelle Obama's uplifting speech, Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren spoke about the rigged system plaguing Americans before launching into a full-throated rebuke of GOP nominee Donald Trump. Trump is "a man who has never sacrificed anything for anyone," she claimed, before saying he "must never be president of the United States." She called him divisive and selfish, and said the American people won't accept his "hate-filled America." In addition to Trump, Warren went after the Republican Party as a whole. "To Republicans in Congress who said no, this November the American people are coming for you," she said.
"In this election, and every election, it's about who will have the power to shape our children for the next four or eight years of their lives," Michelle Obama said. "There is only one person who I trust with that responsibility … and that is our friend Hillary Clinton." In a personal and emotional speech, Michelle Obama spoke about the effect that angry oppositional rhetoric had on her children and how she chose to raise them. "When they go low, we go high," Obama said she told her children about dealing with bullies. Obama stayed mostly positive, but still offered a firm rebuke of Donald Trump, despite never once uttering his name. "The issues a president faces cannot be boiled down to 140 characters," she said.
Many Bernie Sanders delegates have spent much of the first day of the Democratic National Convention resisting unity, booing at mentions of Hillary Clinton and often chanting "Bernie! Bernie!" Well, one of the most outspoken Bernie Sanders supporters just told them to take a seat. "To the Bernie-or-bust people: You're being ridiculous," said comedian Sarah Silverman in a brief appearance at the Convention, minutes after saying that she would proudly support Hillary Clinton for president.
The Democratic National Committee issued a formal apology to Bernie Sanders today, after leaked emails showed staffers trying to sabotage his presidential bid. "On behalf of everyone at the DNC, we want to offer a deep and sincere apology to Senator Sanders, his supporters, and the entire Democratic Party for the inexcusable remarks made over email," DNC officials said in the statement. "These comments do not reflect the values of the DNC or our steadfast commitment to neutrality during the nominating process. The DNC does not—and will not—tolerate disrespectful language exhibited toward our candidates."