Remember Gary Johnson? He Wants to Run for President Again.

The libertarian governor is tilting at yet another windmill.

388141 02: New Mexico Governor Gary Johnson discusses the possibility of the legalization of drugs April 22, 2001 on NBC's 'Meet the Press' during a taping at the NBC studios in Washington, DC. (Photo by Alex Wong/Newsmakers)
National Journal
Emma Roller
April 23, 2014, 12:18 p.m.

Every­one’s third-fa­vor­ite 2012 pres­id­en­tial can­did­ate is back in the ring.

In a Red­dit “Ask Me Any­thing” ses­sion on Tues­day, former New Mex­ico Gov. Gary John­son said he would like to run for pres­id­ent in 2016. He ran against Mitt Rom­ney and Barack Obama as a Liber­tari­an in 2012.

“Let’s skip the pleas­ant­ries and ask the ques­tion every­one wants to know the an­swer to. Will you be run­ning for pres­id­ent in 2016?” one Red­dit user asked John­son.

“I hope to be able to run in 2016,” John­son replied.

When asked which party he would run un­der — Liber­tari­an or Re­pub­lic­an — he said, “I would love run­ning as a Liber­tari­an be­cause I would have the least amount of ex­plain­ing to do.”

This news may be scoffable to some — after all, John­son earned just 1.2 mil­lion votes in 2012, or about 1 per­cent of the pop­u­lar vote. But he ran the most suc­cess­ful third-party cam­paign since Ral­ph Nader in 2000, and we all know how that one turned out.

And while not much may have changed between 2012 and 2016, it’s hard to un­der­es­tim­ate the seis­mic shift to­ward liber­tari­an­ism that the Re­pub­lic­an Party has un­der­gone in the past few years. Yes­ter­days Re­pub­lic­ans wouldn’t have dreamed of sup­port­ing state gay-mar­riage laws or med­ic­al marijuana. Now, the GOP’s big names are skirt­ing those is­sues, but not openly op­pos­ing them, either.

It’s worth re­mem­ber­ing that John­son was at the fore­front of both those is­sues. He’s long been a cru­sader for leg­al­ized marijuana, and he came out in fa­vor of same-sex mar­riage (al­beit not for its fed­er­al pro­tec­tion) long be­fore Pres­id­ent Obama did.

While so­cial is­sues hardly de­cide a pres­id­ency, it goes to show that the mor­als we con­sidered “pres­id­en­tial” yes­ter­day, we may find re­pug­nant to­mor­row. And if the 2016 Re­pub­lic­an nom­in­ee is as clue­less about con­nect­ing with young voters as Mitt Rom­ney was, a John­son can­did­acy might start look­ing a lot more ap­peal­ing.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Maher Weighs in on Bernie, Trump and Palin
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

“We haven’t seen a true leftist since FDR, so many millions are coming out of the woodwork to vote for Bernie Sanders; he is the Occupy movement now come to life in the political arena.” So says Bill Maher in his Hollywood Reporter cover story (more a stream-of-consciousness riff than an essay, actually). Conservative states may never vote for a socialist in the general election, but “this stuff has never been on the table, and these voters have never been activated.” Maher saves most of his bile for Donald Trump and Sarah Palin, writing that by nominating Palin as vice president “John McCain is the one who opened the Book of the Dead and let the monsters out.” And Trump is picking up where Palin left off.

Source:
×