Obama, Congress Flunk National-Service Test

President brags about “boldest expansion” of a program that hasn’t grown (thanks mostly to the GOP).

U.S. President Barack Obama (L) presents the first pen to Sen. Ted Kennedy (D-MA) after signing the Edward M. Kennedy Serve America Act at an event at The SEED Public Charter School April 21, 2009 in Washington, DC. The bill intends to more than triple the AmeriCorp volunteers to over 250,000 in the United States costing taxpayers roughly a billion dollars a year, over the next five years.
National Journal
Ron Fournier
April 21, 2014, 12:27 p.m.

With the au­da­city to over­reach, Pres­id­ent Obama com­mem­or­ated the fifth an­niversary of the bi­par­tis­an Ed­ward M. Kennedy Serve Amer­ica Act on Monday by call­ing it “the bold­est ex­pan­sion of op­por­tun­it­ies to serve our com­munit­ies and our coun­try since the cre­ation of Ameri­Corps.”

He’s wrong. Na­tion­al-ser­vice ad­voc­ates, in­clud­ing Demo­crats oth­er­wise loy­al to Obama, say the law has got­ten little more than lip ser­vice from the White House — and far less than that from House Re­pub­lic­ans.

In fact, both the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion and Con­gress re­ceived fail­ing grades Monday in a re­port by Ser­vi­ceNa­tion and Voices for Na­tion­al Ser­vice, two groups ad­voc­at­ing for pro­grams that sup­port vo­lun­teer­ism and com­munity ser­vice.

This must be what Obama con­siders to be bold and ex­pan­ded:

  • From 2010 to 2013, the num­ber of people serving the na­tion through Ameri­Corps de­clined by nearly 18,000 be­cause of a lack of fund­ing from Wash­ing­ton, ac­cord­ing to the re­port.
  • This year, des­pite soar­ing num­ber of ap­plic­ants for Ameri­Corps po­s­i­tions, few­er than 80,000 na­tion­al-ser­vice mem­bers are serving. That is 120,000 short of the law’s goal for 2014.

The 2009 act au­thor­ized the growth of Ameri­Corps from 75,000 po­s­i­tions in 2008 to 250,000 by 2017. That pledge ap­pears un­at­tain­able, giv­en the res­ist­ance of Re­pub­lic­ans to sup­port na­tion­al ser­vice and Obama’s in­ab­il­ity to over­come the GOP.

“As we cel­eb­rate this an­niversary,” Obama wrote in a let­ter to na­tion­al-ser­vice ad­voc­ates Monday, “let us re­com­mit to ful­filling its prom­ise.” One re­cip­i­ent, who asked not to be iden­ti­fied, emailed me a copy of the let­ter and scoffed, “You can’t re­com­mit to something that’s nev­er been com­mit­ted to.”

Za­ck Maur­in, ex­ec­ut­ive dir­ect­or of Ser­vi­ceNa­tion, put it more dip­lo­mat­ic­ally. “Con­gress and the White House need to make good on their prom­ise,” he said. “The mil­len­ni­al gen­er­a­tion is des­per­ate for op­por­tun­it­ies to work and gain ex­per­i­ence, while com­munit­ies across the coun­try need help tu­tor­ing and ment­or­ing strug­gling stu­dents, re­build­ing after nat­ur­al dis­asters, and help­ing people climb out of poverty.”

The law, named in hon­or of Sen. Ed­ward Kennedy, an ad­voc­ate for na­tion­al ser­vice who died in 2009, builds upon the legacies of Pres­id­ents John­son, Nix­on, George H.W. and George W. Bush, and Clin­ton, each of whom played a role in de­vel­op­ing the mod­ern-day na­tion­al-ser­vice sys­tem. While Obama’s im­me­di­ate pre­de­cessor grew Ameri­Corps by 50 per­cent, the pro­gram has flat­lined un­der the cur­rent ad­min­is­tra­tion.

The re­port lays most of the blame on Re­pub­lic­ans, not­ing that House Budget Com­mit­tee Chair­man Paul Ry­an has called re­peatedly for the elim­in­a­tion of na­tion­al-ser­vice fund­ing. But it also cri­ti­cizes Obama for fin­ess­ing the num­bers in an at­tempt to dis­guise the lack of pro­gress.

I’ve writ­ten pre­vi­ously about the many Demo­crats who be­lieve the pres­id­ent has not fought Re­pub­lic­ans hard enough on be­half of Ameri­Corps. In their re­port re­leased Monday, the two ad­vocacy groups is­sued a re­port card grad­ing Wash­ing­ton’s lead­ers, with an “A” awar­ded in three areas: fo­cus­ing na­tion­al ser­vice to­ward the na­tion’s greatest needs; de­vel­op­ing in­ter­agency part­ner­ships that take ad­vant­age of na­tion­al-ser­vice pro­grams; and steer­ing ser­vice mem­bers to­ward na­tion­al dis­aster re­lief.

In ad­di­tion to the fail­ure to ex­pand the pro­gram, an “F” grade was is­sued against the goals of in­creas­ing ser­vice op­por­tun­it­ies for older Amer­ic­ans and en­han­cing ser­vice-lead­ing op­por­tun­it­ies for the young.

“This re­port high­lights a lead­er­ship op­por­tun­ity for Con­gress and the ad­min­is­tra­tion to step up and make good on the prom­ise made five years ago to ex­pand and strengthen na­tion­al ser­vice,” said An­nMaura Con­nolly, pres­id­ent of Voices for Na­tion­al Ser­vice.

(Cour­tesy of Ser­vi­ceNa­tion)

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
CITIZENS UNITED PT. 2?
Movie Based on ‘Clinton Cash’ to Debut at Cannes
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."

Source:
×