Ben Carson Is Raking in More Money Than Hillary Clinton or Rand Paul for 2016

But the group that wants him to run for president has a spending problem.

World-renowned pediatric neurosurgeon and philanthropist Dr. Benjamin Carson Sr. speaks to an audience in Central Michigan University in October 2009.
National Journal
Emma Roller
April 18, 2014, 9:31 a.m.

Fox News calls him a “con­ser­vat­ive sage.” But is Dr. Ben Car­son — a re­tired neurosur­geon who gained Re­pub­lic­an fans after speak­ing freely at last year’s Na­tion­al Pray­er Break­fast — really the next great hope for 2016?

Judging by his early fun­drais­ing num­bers, some people cer­tainly think he is. As Re­u­ters re­ports, one group is push­ing hard for a Car­son 2016 bid. The Na­tion­al Draft Ben Car­son for Pres­id­ent Com­mit­tee has raised $2.4 mil­lion over the last three months — more than sim­il­ar groups sup­port­ing po­ten­tial can­did­ates like Hil­lary Clin­ton, Sen. Rand Paul, and Sen. Marco Ru­bio.

Car­son first gained na­tion­al prom­in­ence at the 2013 Na­tion­al Pray­er Break­fast, where he com­pared the U.S. de­fi­cit to the “mor­al de­cay and fisc­al ir­re­spons­ib­il­ity” found in an­cient Rome be­fore its col­lapse, and said polit­ic­al cor­rect­ness “puts a muzzle on people.” (He also spoke at the 1997 Na­tion­al Pray­er Break­fast, along­side Bill Clin­ton.)

Since his pray­er-break­fast speech, Car­son has gone on to liken ele­ments of the gov­ern­ment to Nazi Ger­many and com­pare Obama­care un­fa­vor­ably to the at­tack on Pearl Har­bor and Jim Crow laws. Through his con­ser­vat­ive fan base, he’s earned pub­li­city in the form of speak­ing gigs at CPAC, as a Fox News con­trib­ut­or, and as a colum­nist for the con­ser­vat­ive Wash­ing­ton Times.

But like the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment in Car­son’s cri­tique, the group back­ing him seems to have a spend­ing prob­lem, too. From Re­u­ters:

Though the Draft Ben Car­son com­mit­tee has raised $3.9 mil­lion since it was set up last year, it has spent money just as stead­ily. At the end of March, the com­mit­tee had $228,000 in the bank and car­ried $515,000 in debt, ac­cord­ing to a fil­ing with the Fed­er­al Elec­tion Com­mis­sion.

The group try­ing to draft Car­son is led by John Philip Sousa IV — yes, a des­cend­ant of that John Philip Sousa — who said he star­ted the group so that, if Car­son does de­cide to run, he’ll have the cam­paign in­fra­struc­ture already in place.

Though a spokes­man for Car­son told Re­u­ters that he is not in­ter­ested in run­ning for pres­id­ent, Car­son has said he’d make an ex­cep­tion for di­vine in­ter­ven­tion: “If the Lord grabbed me by the col­lar and made me do it, I would.”

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
10 hours ago
NATIONAL JOURNAL AFTER DARK

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Source:
STATE VS. FEDERAL
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
10 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
10 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
10 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
11 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”

Source:
×