An Anti-Kwanzaa, Anti-Water Sanitation Lawmaker in Wisconsin Is Running for Congress

He could be a serious challenger.

A vanity license plate is seen on a car beonging to republican Wisconsin State Senator Glenn Grothman outside of the Wisconsin State Capitol on March 4, 2011 in Madison, Wisconsin.
National Journal
Emma Roller
April 3, 2014, 9:56 a.m.

Wis­con­sin state Sen. Glenn Groth­man has the most re­cog­niz­able car at the state Cap­it­ol. That’s be­cause of his van­ity plates: “TAX CUTR.”

Now, Groth­man wants to take those plates na­tion­al. He an­nounced his plans to run a primary cam­paign against Rep. Tom Petri, R-Wis., in the state’s 6th Con­gres­sion­al Dis­trict, as re­por­ted by the Mil­wau­kee Journ­al Sen­tinel:

On Thursday, Groth­man said he would con­duct an is­sue-ori­ented cam­paign. He said he would cam­paign against the Af­ford­able Care Act, and said Petri, who voted against the le­gis­la­tion, “im­plied he didn’t mind a big­ger gov­ern­ment role in health care.”

Petri, who has rep­res­en­ted his con­ser­vat­ive dis­trict since 1979, is mild but well-liked. He’s brought home fed­er­al funds for roads and bridges, and ad­voc­ated for loc­al busi­nesses. In the two Re­pub­lic­an primar­ies he’s faced in his ten­ure, he’s won both with at least 82 per­cent of the vote. He also has a $1 mil­lion war chest.

But Groth­man is not a joke can­did­ate, nor should Petri’s cam­paign treat him as such. Petri, who is 73, hails from the golden age of mod­er­ate con­ser­vat­ism — a brand that’s be­come in­creas­ingly passé in the mod­ern GOP.

Mean­while, in his 21 years in the state Le­gis­lature, Groth­man has nev­er shied from de­noun­cing gov­ern­ment over­reach and a per­ceived lib­er­al in­doc­trin­a­tion through in­sti­tu­tions like the Uni­versity of Wis­con­sin and pub­lic-em­ploy­ee uni­ons.

“I think the col­leges of edu­ca­tion are of a left­ist bent,” he told Isth­mus in 2011. “I think the teach­ers uni­on is of a left­ist bent, and I think to a cer­tain ex­tent their ideas are pushed on the teach­ers [and later stu­dents]. And it’s what’s taught in the cul­ture — movies, TV.”

For Groth­man, lib­er­al­ism — or rather, left­ism — has per­vaded all areas of mod­ern cul­ture. In the past, Groth­man has de­cried Kwan­zaa, call­ing the hol­i­day a lib­er­al scheme. “Of course, al­most no black people today care about Kwan­zaa — just white left-wing­ers who try to shove this down black people’s throats in an ef­fort to di­vide Amer­ic­ans,” Groth­man wrote in 2012.

He’s also voiced his ob­jec­tion to equal-pay laws, say­ing pay dis­crim­in­a­tion against wo­men isn’t a real prob­lem. His jus­ti­fic­a­tion? “You could ar­gue that money is more im­port­ant for men,” he told the Daily Beast. I think a guy in their first job, maybe be­cause they ex­pect to be a bread­win­ner someday, may be a little more money-con­scious. To at­trib­ute everything to a so-called bi­as in the work­place is just not true.”

And in 2011, Groth­man sponsored a bill to do away with mu­ni­cip­al wa­ter dis­in­fec­tion. For con­text: in 1993, a Crypto­spor­idi­um out­break in the Mil­wau­kee area’s wa­ter sup­ply led to the deaths of at least 69 people.

Still, Groth­man has rock-sol­id con­ser­vat­ive cre­den­tials with­in the state, tak­ing on the role of hype man for Gov. Scott Walk­er’s strict voter-ID law. In an in­ter­view with MS­N­BC last fall, Groth­man said voters who struggle with the state’s new voter-ID laws prob­ably didn’t care about vot­ing.

“Between [early vot­ing], mail ab­sent­ee, and vot­ing the day of elec­tion, you know, I mean any­body who can’t vote with all those op­tions, they’ve really got a prob­lem,” Groth­man told MS­N­BC. “I really don’t think they care that much about vot­ing in the first place, right?”

Groth­man is no stranger to mud­sling­ing polit­ics. So Petri bet­ter watch out — or at least start court­ing Wis­con­sin’s Kwan­zaa cel­eb­rants.

What We're Following See More »
1.5 MILLION MORE TUNED IN FOR TRUMP
More People Watched Trump’s Acceptance Speech
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

Hillary Clinton hopes that television ratings for the candidates' acceptance speeches at their respective conventions aren't foreshadowing of similar results at the polls in November. Preliminary results from the networks and cable channels show that 34.9 million people tuned in for Donald Trump's acceptance speech while 33.3 million watched Clinton accept the Democratic nomination. However, it is still possible that the numbers are closer than these ratings suggest: the numbers don't include ratings from PBS or CSPAN, which tend to attract more Democratic viewers.

Source:
×