Hillary Clinton may not appear on a ballot anywhere for at least another year and a half, but her (first) name will in just a few days.
On Tuesday, Democrats in Washington will head to the polls to decide a contentious mayoral primary, but farther down the ballot, they’ll also have the option of voting for a “D.C. Ready for Hillary” slate of candidates running for party-leadership positions.
The four candidates have no affiliation with the super PAC of the same name, but they’re fired up about the former secretary of State, and want voters to know that.
“We have been strong supporters of Hillary through the years and so we thought that by identifying ourselves with the hopes that she would run, that would help people understand our direction and draw them to us,” said MaryEva Candon, a longtime local party leader who is running on the slate for Democratic national committeewoman from the District of Columbia. Setting the rules for the presidential primary process is a key job for committee members.
Also on the slate is Arrington Dixon, a former D.c. council member, who is running for Democratic national committeeman, along with Philip Pannell and Courtney Snowden, who are running as alternates. Dixon and Candon have both previously served as DNC members, including during the 2008 Democratic primary. If they win, they’ll also serve on the local party’s executive committee.
Candon said the Clinton name (and paraphernalia) are a major draw. “If you support Hillary, you might like to support us, instead of others running for the same position,” she says she tells people at events. “People want our stickers, it’s really fun.”
They’ll be competing against candidates running on a “The Rent Is Too Darn High” slate, among others.
While the Ready for Hillary candidates have no official connection to the Ready for Hillary super PAC, Candon said she and her running mates are members of the grassroots organization, and want to support their work. “We are not a subsidiary of them, but we are an advocate of them,” she said. “We are a grassroots effort that wants her to run also, so we borrowed their name, Ready for Hillary, and added D.C. so we weren’t exactly the same.”
Ready for Hillary (the super PAC) declined to comment for the record, but those close to the group see it as evidence of the strength and popularity of their brand (which is itself derivative of the strength and popularity of Hillary Clinton’s brand).
- 1 How Ron Wyden Banned Internet Taxes Forever
- 2 Obama’s Second-Term Agenda Hits a Roadblock: the Supreme Court
- 3 John Kasich Dismisses Climate Change As ‘Some Theory That’s Not Proven’
- 4 Obamacare Will Reduce Income Inequality, but Quietly
- 5 I Did Improv With the ‘Jeopardy Villain,’ and He’s Exactly as He Appears on Television
What We're Following See More »
Under pressure from a judge, the State Department will release about 550 of Hillary Clinton’s emails—“roughly 14 percent of the 3,700 remaining Clinton emails—on Saturday, in the middle of the Presidents Day holiday weekend.” All of the emails were supposed to have been released last month. Related: State subpoenaed the Clinton Foundation last year, which brings the total number of current Clinton investigations to four, says the Daily Caller.
UPDATED: Sen. Jim Webb (D-VA) will not be playing the role of Ralph Nader in this year’s election. Speaking in Dallas today, Webb said, “We looked at the possibility of an independent candidacy. Theoretically, it could be done, but it is enormously costly and time sensitive, and I don’t see the fundraising trajectory where we could make a realistic run.”
“The leaders of the Republican and Democratic national committees on Wednesday weighed in on the prospect of an independent presidential run by” former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg (I). “DNC Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz suggested that the former New York City mayor’s priorities are already ‘well cared-for’ in the Democratic platform, while RNC leader Reince Priebus welcomed the idea, saying Bloomberg would siphon off votes from the Democratic candidate.”
Three hundred fifty-two, thanks to superdelegates pledged to Clinton, and the vagaries of the delegate allocation process in early states. Not bad, considering her results have been a virtual tie and a blowout loss.