States Holding Out on Medicaid Expansion Are Beginning to Crack

New Hampshire could be the first of many to sign on.

National Journal
Lucia Graves
March 21, 2014, 1 a.m.

As Planned Par­ent­hood sup­port­ers ral­lied out­side Flor­ida Gov. Rick Scott’s of­fice earli­er this week, state Sen. Arthenia Joyn­er lashed out at op­pon­ents of Medi­caid ex­pan­sion. Stand­ing at a wooden lectern, sur­roun­ded by scores of wo­men, she crossed party lines to stump for a bill that would in­crease the num­ber of poor Flor­idi­ans covered by Medi­caid.

“We need to pass Sen. Gar­cia’s bill,” the Demo­crat told the gathered masses, re­fer­ring to a pro­pos­al in­tro­duced by her Re­pub­lic­an col­league Rene Gar­cia. “It was good enough for the speak­er’s fam­ily,” she ad­ded, re­fer­ring to a time when Re­pub­lic­an House Speak­er Will Weather­ford’s fam­ily had re­lied on med­ic­al as­sist­ance to pay for his broth­er’s can­cer treat­ments. “By golly, it’s good enough for all of the fam­il­ies of Flor­ida.” That story, first re­por­ted in The Tampa Tribune, is just the latest sign that Obama­care’s Medi­caid ex­pan­sion ef­fort has reached a tip­ping point.

With 25 states and the Dis­trict of Columbia opt­ing in to Medi­caid un­der the Af­ford­able Care Act and an­oth­er six in limbo, the tu­mult in a hand­ful of hol­d­out states is in­creas­ing. The White House hopes un­rest in states like Flor­ida, New Hamp­shire, Neb­raska, and Maine will help turn the fight de­cidedly in their fa­vor. And there’s good reas­on to think that’s hap­pen­ing.

New Hamp­shire, a state that was non­com­mit­tal on Medi­caid ex­pan­sion, is now on the brink of ex­pand­ing cov­er­age to ap­prox­im­ately 50,000 poor res­id­ents. The Re­pub­lic­an-con­trolled Sen­ate voted to pass a state-mod­i­fied ver­sion of ex­pan­sion earli­er this month. And, on Tues­day, a House pan­el en­dorsed the mo­tion. The Demo­crat­ic-con­trolled House is ex­pec­ted to pass the bill in a vote next week.

In Vir­gin­ia, Demo­crat­ic Gov. Terry McAul­iffe has been fight­ing for Medi­caid ex­pan­sion since he was elec­ted in Novem­ber (the Re­pub­lic­an-led House is op­posed). Ten­sions came to a head this week­end when sev­er­al hun­dred demon­strat­ors gathered out­side the state Cap­it­ol in Rich­mond to rally for Medi­caid ex­pan­sion, car­ry­ing signs that read “We need Medi­caid ex­pan­sion now” and “Get sick, go broke, un­ac­cept­able!”

In Pennsylvania, Re­pub­lic­an Gov. Tom Corbett had ori­gin­ally pro­posed a mod­i­fied ver­sion of the pro­gram, ty­ing in a con­tro­ver­sial re­quire­ment that mad­ated those work­ing few­er than 20 hours per week par­ti­cip­ate in a job-train­ing pro­gram to qual­i­fy for cov­er­age. The gov­ernor has since sub­mit­ted a softer pro­pos­al that “re­stores some be­ne­fits” and drops the work-search re­quire­ment in fa­vor of a vol­un­tary pi­lot pro­gram. That plan, cur­rently un­der re­view by the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment, is un­likely to win sup­port from Wash­ing­ton, giv­en Corbett’s stip­u­la­tions.

Rep­res­ent­at­ives for Utah Gov. Gary Her­bert traveled to D.C. this week to dis­cuss Medi­caid ex­pan­sion ef­forts with ad­min­is­tra­tion of­fi­cials. The gov­ernor, who ini­tially re­frained from opt­ing in, in Janu­ary vowed to take ac­tion on Medi­caid ex­pan­sion, say­ing while he op­poses Pres­id­ent Obama’s health care law, the state has an ob­lig­a­tion to help its poor. But his pro­pos­al, a “block grant” op­tion that would use fed­er­al dol­lars to cov­er the poor in private plans, failed to win the sup­port of Re­pub­lic­an lead­ers in the House and Sen­ate. The Salt Lake Tribune re­ports that “though he lacks the back­ing of the Le­gis­lature, law­makers haven’t tied his hands.” Her­bert ad­visers meet­ing with the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion this week in­clude Wes­ley Smith, dir­ect­or of state and fed­er­al re­la­tions; Dav­id Pat­ton, head of the state’s De­part­ment of Health; and staff mem­bers from the Health De­part­ment’s Medi­caid of­fice, ac­cord­ing to the Deser­et News.

Move­ment in Mis­souri has been sty­mied by a stan­doff between Demo­crat­ic Gov. Jay Nix­on, an ad­voc­ate of ex­pan­sion, and the state’s GOP Le­gis­lature. But even there, the dy­nam­ic is start­ing to shift. KCUR.org re­por­ted Tues­day that Mis­souri politi­cians “might be inch­ing to­ward middle ground that would ex­pand Medi­caid eli­gib­il­ity while re­form­ing the safety-net pro­gram to en­cour­age re­cip­i­ents to work,” ac­cord­ing to two key par­ti­cipants in the talks. Le­gis­la­tion pending in the House is sched­uled for a hear­ing on on March 25.

These stor­ies of in­cre­ment­al pro­gress can also be found in states that have re­jec­ted Medi­caid ex­pan­sion out­right, a de­cision states may change at any time. In Neb­raska, the Le­gis­lature is bat­tling it out over ex­pan­sion with on­look­ers like Demo­crat­ic gubernat­ori­al can­did­ate Chuck Hassebrook,who is ur­ging state law­makers to pass a bill that would ex­pand cov­er­age to some 54,000 un­in­sured Neb­raskans. Small protests have be­gun in South Car­o­lina, with demon­strat­ors gath­er­ing out­side the State House park­ing gar­age weekly to protest the state’s de­cision not to ac­cept fed­er­al Medi­caid money. (On Tues­day, the 16 pro­test­ers were sent to court for ob­struct­ing traffic.) And in Maine, state law­makers have backed a com­prom­ise on Medi­caid ex­pan­sion but fell just short of the veto-proof ma­jor­ity needed to get it past Re­pub­lic­an Gov. Paul LePage. (Maine’s ver­sion of the bill would ex­pand the state Medi­caid pro­gram to provide health care cov­er­age for 60,000 to 70,000 in­di­vidu­als earn­ing just over $15,856 a year.)

No doubt many of these bills will con­tin­ue to be sty­mied for some time — vir­tu­ally all of them by people with the means not to rely on such in­sur­ance. And plenty of con­ser­vat­ive crit­ics will con­tin­ue to rage that Medi­caid ex­pan­sion is “sin­ful” and that the Af­ford­able Care Act is “a plot to des­troy the fam­ily.” But it’s look­ing in­creas­ingly like time is not on their side.

What We're Following See More »
A DARK CLOUD OVER TRUMP?
Snowstorm Could Impact Primary Turnout
2 days ago
THE LATEST

A snowstorm is supposed to hit New Hampshire today and “linger into Primary Tuesday.” GOP consultant Ron Kaufman said lower turnout should help candidates who have spent a lot of time in the state tending to retail politicking. Donald Trump “has acknowledged that he needs to step up his ground-game, and a heavy snowfall could depress his figures relative to more organized candidates.”

Source:
IN CASE OF EMERGENCY
A Shake-Up in the Offing in the Clinton Camp?
2 days ago
THE DETAILS

Anticipating a primary loss in New Hampshire on Tuesday, Hillary and Bill Clinton “are considering staffing and strategy changes” to their campaign. Sources tell Politico that the Clintons are likely to layer over top officials with experienced talent, rather than fire their staff en masse.

Source:
THE LAST ROUND OF NEW HAMPSHIRE POLLS
Trump Is Still Ahead, but Who’s in Second?
1 days ago
THE LATEST

We may not be talking about New Hampshire primary polls for another three-and-a-half years, so here goes:

  • American Research Group’s tracking poll has Donald Trump in the lead with 30% support, followed by Marco Rubio and John Kasich tying for second place at 16%. On the Democratic side, Bernie Sanders leads Hillary Clinton 53%-41%.
  • The 7 News/UMass Lowell tracking poll has Trump way out front with 34%, followed by Rubio and Ted Cruz with 13% apiece. Among the Democrats, Sanders is in front 56%-40%.
  • A Gravis poll puts Trump ahead with 28%, followed by Kasich with 17% and Rubio with 15%.
IT’S ALL ABOUT SECOND PLACE
CNN Calls the Primary for Sanders and Trump
1 days ago
THE LATEST

Well that didn’t take long. CNN has already declared Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump the winners of the New Hampshire primary, leaving the rest of the candidates to fight for the scraps. Five minutes later, the Associated Press echoed CNN’s call.

Source:
×