At a speech to an antiabortion crowd in Washington on Wednesday night, Republican lawmakers outdid each other to denounce abortion. Sen. Mike Lee of Utah accused abortion-rights supporters of engaging in “savagery” and a “culture of death.” Former presidential candidate Mike Huckabee said the logic behind abortion would also justify killing off senior citizens. And Sen. Ted Cruz likened abortion-rights supporters to Satanists:
Cruz said that at the rally outside the Texas Capitol [in Austin], abortion rights protesters walked “arm-in-arm, chanting ‘Hail, Satan,’ embracing the right to take the life of a late-term child.”
How does an actual Satanist feel about that comparison?
Lucien Greaves, communications director of the Satanic Temple, says Cruz’s comments oversimplify the issue by trying to inject religion into the abortion debate. Although pro-abortion-rights protesters did indeed chant “Hail Satan” at a rally outside the Texas Capitol, it was to combat antiabortion protesters who were singing “Amazing Grace.”
“The message conveyed by the Hail Satan faction was, I feel, both salient and clear: Religious rationales used to justify certain views to some hold no currency whatsoever to scores of others,” Greaves told National Journal. “Chanting ‘Hail Satan’ was an effective way of saying, ‘You are going to have to argue your point on rational grounds. We do not subscribe to your religion.’ “
Greaves says it’s preposterous to think that the abortion-rights philosophy is actually rooted in Satanism, and that the Satanism movement isn’t necessarily about devil worshipping, but a thumbing-of-the-nose to religious conservatives. “As homosexuals, pro-choice advocates, and others are ostracized by mainstream churches, more and more people conscientiously embrace Satanism as a metaphor for their rejection of oppressive religious cruelty,” he said.
UPDATE (2:37 p.m.):
Catherine Frazier, Sen. Cruz’s press secretary, had this to say: “Cruz did not liken or compare abortion advocates as Satanists — he told the truth about a protest in Austin.”
For clarification, here are Cruz’s exact remarks referencing the protest in Austin:
“Pro-life protesters put their arms around each other and began singing ‘Amazing grace. And the pro-abortion protesters began chanting, ‘Hail Satan.’ You know, there comes a point where you can’t make this stuff up. At least it’s truth-in-advertising! But that is, in fact, what they were doing, arm in arm, chanting, ‘Hail Satan,’ embracing the right to take the life of a late-term child.”
Correction: The original version of this story misstated the location of the Susan B. Anthony List summit. It took place in Washington, D.C.
What We're Following See More »
The great restroom war of 2016 continues apace, as eleven states have sued the Obama administration in federal court, claiming its federal guidance on how schools should accommodate transgender students "has no basis in law." "The lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas on behalf of Alabama, Arizona, Georgia, Louisiana, Maine, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, West Virginia and Wisconsin. The lawsuit argues that the federal government has worked to turn workplaces and schools 'into laboratories for a massive social experiment.'"
By a 29-10 vote, the House Natural Resources Committee today passed the bill to allow Puerto Rico to restructure its $70 billion in debt. The legislation "would establish an oversight board to help the commonwealth restructure its un-payable debt and craft an economic recovery plan."
"Though every major party nominee since 1976 has released his tax returns while running for president, the practice has never been required by law. Sen. Ron Wyden (D-OR) wants to change that. The senior Democrat on the Senate Finance Committee, which handles tax issues, introduced a bill on Wednesday that would force presidential candidates to release their most recent tax returns. The Presidential Tax Transparency Act, as the bill is called, would require candidates to make their latest three years of tax returns public no later than 15 days after becoming the nominee."
"The U.S. Capitol does not meet the federal government’s own standards for accommodations for new mothers," according to an investigation by NBC Channel 4. "Though the U.S. General Services Administration, a government agency which oversees the management of federal government buildings, requires a minimum number of lactation stations and changing tables, Congress is exempt from the rules and fails to meet those standards." The Capitol grounds have 12 lactations stations, far short of the 42 that would be required given the number of female workers there.