Mike Huckabee Thinks Female Candidates Require ‘a Sense of Pedestal’

The former Arkansas governor is trying to bring chivalry back.

Former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee speaks during the second day of the Conservative Political Action Conference at the Gaylord International Hotel and Conference Center March 7, 2014 in National Harbor, Maryland.
National Journal
Emma Roller
March 11, 2014, 9:05 a.m.

Like Mel Gib­son in that 2000 cine­mat­ic mas­ter­piece, Mike Hucka­bee just wants to un­der­stand what wo­men want. The erstwhile Arkan­sas gov­ernor, pres­id­en­tial can­did­ate, and Fox talk­ing head has been try­ing to change the nar­rat­ive of the GOP’s dif­fi­culty con­nect­ing with wo­men voters. His ar­gu­ment: Demo­crats’ fo­cus on wo­men’s re­pro­duct­ive health is de­mean­ing, and makes them “vic­tims of their gender.”

There’s good reas­on for Hucka­bee to have fe­male politi­cians on the brain. In a re­cent CNN poll, he led Re­pub­lic­ans but trailed Hil­lary Clin­ton, 56 per­cent to 39 per­cent. In last Sat­urday’s CPAC straw poll, Hucka­bee was sand­wiched between Con­doleezza Rice and Sarah Pal­in for second-to-last place.

Des­pite, or per­haps be­cause of, these losses, Hucka­bee says that fe­male polit­ic­al op­pon­ents should be giv­en a light­er touch than man-on-man polit­ic­al wrass­ling. In an in­ter­view with The New Re­pub­lic, Hucka­bee spec­u­lated on the dif­fi­culties of run­ning against a fe­male can­did­ate, and he made a com­ment re­min­is­cent of this scene from “The 40-Year-Old Vir­gin.”

“I’ve twice run against wo­men op­pon­ents, and it’s a very dif­fer­ent kind of ap­proach,” he tells [TNR re­port­er Nora Ca­plan-Brick­er]. Dif­fer­ent how? “For those of us who have some chiv­alry left, there’s a level of re­spect…. You treat some things as a spe­cial treas­ure; you treat oth­er things as com­mon.” A male op­pon­ent is “com­mon,” a wo­man re­quires “a sense of ped­es­tal.”

Hucka­bee is try­ing to con­vince fe­male voters that it is Demo­crats, not Re­pub­lic­ans, who are es­sen­tial­iz­ing them by their re­pro­duct­ive or­gans (nev­er mind that he once ar­gued that wo­men are worse at mul­ti­task­ing than men be­cause of their men­stru­al cycles). Dur­ing his speech to the RNC in Janu­ary, Hucka­bee went on a doozy of a rant, ar­guing that Demo­crats see the gov­ern­ment as “Uncle Sug­ar” and treat wo­men as “hope­less creatures whose only goal in life is to have a gov­ern­ment provide for them birth-con­trol med­ic­a­tion.”

Hucka­bee’s new quest is to pro­tect fe­male voters from Demo­crat­ic brain­wash­ing, and to de­fend the hon­or of his fe­male op­pon­ents by giv­ing them “a sense of ped­es­tal.” As Hucka­bee told TNR: “I treat my wife very dif­fer­ently than I treat my chums and my pals. I wouldn’t worry about call­ing them on Valentine’s Day, open­ing the door for them, or mak­ing sure they were OK.”

But, while I ap­pre­ci­ate a good door-hold­ing-open as much as the next girl, Hucka­bee’s chiv­alry ar­gu­ment doesn’t really hold up when you’re try­ing to win elec­tions. Polit­ic­al cam­paigns don’t have to be sex­ist, but they are in­nately un­chiv­al­rous (if they’re run well, at least). It’s disin­genu­ous to con­flate every polit­ic­al at­tack with sex­ism, and it’s a flawed ar­gu­ment made by both parties — Hil­lary Clin­ton’s hard-core de­fend­ers will of­ten cry “Sex­ism!” as a crutch against le­git­im­ate cri­ti­cism. Both sides are try­ing to con­vince wo­men that the oth­er party is con­des­cend­ing to them. But only Hucka­bee thinks it’s apt to com­pare Valentine’s Day to Elec­tion Day.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
10 hours ago
NATIONAL JOURNAL AFTER DARK

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Source:
STATE VS. FEDERAL
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
10 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
10 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
10 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
11 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”

Source:
×