For Rick Santorum, It’s 2012 All Over Again

Santorum’s linguistic gripes and emphasis on the blue-collar vote is the same speech he’s been giving for years.

National Journal
Lucia Graves
March 7, 2014, 11:02 a.m.

For any­one who fol­lowed the 2012 pres­id­en­tial-elec­tion cycle, Rick San­tor­um’s speech Fri­day prob­ably soun­ded fa­mil­i­ar.

In 2012, San­tor­um had so­lid­i­fied his role as the nice guy in the race. And in his speech at the Con­ser­vat­ive Polit­ic­al Ac­tion Con­fer­ence this year, he re­minded every­one why.

“We’re told we have to put aside what we be­lieve is the best in­terest of the coun­try so that a Re­pub­lic­an can­did­ate can win,” he told a packed audi­ence. “That may res­ult in a win for a Re­pub­lic­an can­did­ate but it will be a dev­ast­at­ing loss for Amer­ica.”

He em­phas­ized con­ser­vat­ive val­ues like re­claim­ing the “true beau­ti­ful in­sti­tu­tion of mar­riage” over fight­ing with fel­low Re­pub­lic­ans, and waxed nos­tal­gic about everything he did back in his fa­vor­ite year: 2012.

“I didn’t run to carry the agenda,” he said with­in the first few minutes of his speech. “I didn’t run to put forth is­sues. I ran be­cause I wanted us to win the White House.” He also drew a dir­ect line between his race in 2012 and Re­agan’s 1976 race, stress­ing that Re­agan won not be­cause he was a cul­tur­al con­ser­vat­ive but be­cause he fo­cused on work­ing Amer­ic­ans.

That fed per­fectly in­to one of San­tor­um’s top gripes from 2012: the term “middle-class,” or class-any­thing, really.

“Do you really ac­cept the idea that there are classes in Amer­ica?” he de­man­ded of the as­sembled con­ser­vat­ives, ex­plain­ing they should really all use the term “work­ing Amer­ic­ans” in­stead. Be­cause un­like Demo­crats (who pre­sum­ably hate work and love wel­fare), “we be­lieve work is a good thing.”

“They use the class rhet­or­ic be­cause they’re all about di­vid­ing,” he said, “That’s what they do, they di­vide. Let them di­vide; let us uni­fy!”

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4798) }}

He made that point to con­sid­er­able cheers. It’s also one he’s made be­fore.

At an event with his GOP primary com­pet­it­ors in Janu­ary 2012, he chided Mitt Rom­ney for us­ing pre­cisely this lan­guage:

The gov­ernor used a term earli­er that I shrink from. It’s one that I don’t think we should be us­ing as Re­pub­lic­ans, “middle class.” There are no classes in Amer­ica. We are a coun­try that don’t al­low for titles. We don’t put people in classes. There may be middle-in­come people, but the idea that some­how or an­oth­er we’re go­ing to buy in­to the class-war­fare ar­gu­ments of Barack Obama is something that should not be part of the Re­pub­lic­an lex­icon.

Pre­vi­ously he had at­tacked Obama with a very sim­il­ar talk­ing point. “You’ll nev­er hear the word ‘class’ come out of my mouth,” he said. “Classes? We spe­cific­ally re­jec­ted that. Look in the Con­sti­tu­tion.”

He likes the point so much, in fact, that he kept us­ing it even after he left the cam­paign trail. While speak­ing at a GOP fun­draiser in Au­gust of last year, he told the audi­ence:

Don’t use the term the oth­er side uses. What does Barack Obama talk about all the time? The middle class,” he said at a fun­draiser hos­ted by the Ly­on County GOP. “Since when in Amer­ica do we have classes? Since when in Amer­ica are people stuck in areas or defined places called a class? That’s Marx­ism talk.

A tweet by Slate‘s Dave Wei­gel summed it up: “San­tor­um giv­ing the same ‘I could have won in 2012 be­cause blue col­lar’ speech he’s giv­en for a year.”

In­deed, it looks like mostly what we were get­ting was a sales pitch. San­tor­um’s book on how the GOP can ap­peal to blue-col­lar work­ers is ex­pec­ted out later this year. And if Re­pub­lic­ans’ struggle to cap­ture the blue-col­lar vote in the last elec­tion cycle is any in­dic­a­tion, the book will sell.

What We're Following See More »
THE 1%
Sanders’s Appeals to Minorities Still Filtered Through Wall Street Talk
57 minutes ago
WHY WE CARE

It’s all about the 1% and Wall Street versus everyone else for Bernie Sanders—even when he’s talking about race relations. Like Hillary Clinton, he needs to appeal to African-American and Hispanic voters in coming states, but he insists on doing so through his lens of class warfare. When he got a question from the moderators about the plight of black America, he noted that during the great recession, African Americans “lost half their wealth,” and “instead of tax breaks for billionaires,” a Sanders presidency would deliver jobs for kids. On the very next question, he downplayed the role of race in inequality, saying, “It’s a racial issue, but it’s also a general economic issue.”

DIRECT APPEAL TO MINORITIES, WOMEN
Clinton Already Pivoting Her Messaging
1 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

It’s been said in just about every news story since New Hampshire: the primaries are headed to states where Hillary Clinton will do well among minority voters. Leaving nothing to chance, she underscored that point in her opening statement in the Milwaukee debate tonight, saying more needs to be done to help “African Americans who face discrimination in the job market” and immigrant families. She also made an explicit reference to “equal pay for women’s work.” Those boxes she’s checking are no coincidence: if she wins women, blacks and Hispanics, she wins the nomination.

THE QUESTION
How Many Jobs Would Be Lost Under Bernie Sanders’s Single-Payer System?
9 hours ago
THE ANSWER

More than 11 million, according to Manhattan Institute fellow Yevgeniy Feyman, writing in RealClearPolicy.

Source:
WEEKEND DATA DUMP
State to Release 550 More Clinton Emails on Saturday
9 hours ago
THE LATEST

Under pressure from a judge, the State Department will release about 550 of Hillary Clinton’s emails—“roughly 14 percent of the 3,700 remaining Clinton emails—on Saturday, in the middle of the Presidents Day holiday weekend.” All of the emails were supposed to have been released last month. Related: State subpoenaed the Clinton Foundation last year, which brings the total number of current Clinton investigations to four, says the Daily Caller.

Source:
LATER TO THIS YEAR’S NADER
Jim Webb Rules Out Independent Bid
9 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

UPDATED: Sen. Jim Webb (D-VA) will not be playing the role of Ralph Nader in this year’s election. Speaking in Dallas today, Webb said, “We looked at the possibility of an independent candidacy. Theoretically, it could be done, but it is enormously costly and time sensitive, and I don’t see the fundraising trajectory where we could make a realistic run.”

Source:
×