A Cheat Sheet to the Conservative Money Machine

New database will let anyone see how much right-leaning “dark money” groups are raising. (Note to the Right: You can do this too.)

TAMPA, FL - AUGUST 30: People listen as Republican presidential candidate, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney delivers his nomination acceptance speech during the final day of the Republican National Convention at the Tampa Bay Times Forum on August 30, 2012 in Tampa, Florida. Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney was nominated as the Republican presidential candidate during the RNC which will conclude today.
National Journal
Alex Seitz-Wald
March 5, 2014, 11:09 a.m.

A Demo­crat­ic group is hop­ing to shine a light in­to an opaque corner of the con­ser­vat­ive money ma­chine, with a new search­able data­base of hun­dreds of right-lean­ing non­profit groups, found­a­tions, busi­ness leagues, wealthy in­di­vidu­als, and oth­er polit­ic­al play­ers whose ac­tions are dif­fi­cult to scru­tin­ize.

While su­per PACs have got­ten the most at­ten­tion in the post-Cit­izens United world, the area that troubles many cam­paign fin­ance watch­dogs the most are “dark money” groups, which are not re­quired to dis­close their donors or much else to the pub­lic.

Un­like polit­ic­al out­fits that must make reg­u­lar re­ports on their activ­it­ies to the Fed­er­al Elec­tion Com­mis­sion, these non­profit groups are reg­u­lated by the In­tern­al Rev­en­ue Ser­vice. And even though they are tech­nic­ally re­quired to make their an­nu­al IRS re­ports — known as 990s — avail­able to the pub­lic, the forms are usu­ally not avail­able on­line and can be dif­fi­cult or im­possible to ob­tain.

The new web­site, Con­ser­vat­iv­eTrans­par­ency.org, which of­fi­cially launches Thursday, puts all those forms in one user-friendly place, and uses the data from them and oth­er sources to track the flow of money among the vari­ous donors, ad­vocacy groups, polit­ic­al com­mit­tees, and can­did­ates.

“We wanted to put to­geth­er the most com­pre­hens­ive data­base around of the con­ser­vat­ive money that’s out there, but also make it very ac­cess­ible,” said Ed­die Vale, the vice pres­id­ent of Bridge Pro­ject, which cre­ated the web­site. “It’s one com­pre­hens­ive place where you can look at all of these groups.”

Users can browse by donors, re­cip­i­ent, or can­did­ate, or they can search for more-de­tailed in­form­a­tion to see how money moves between the groups. Users can also search an in­di­vidu­al donor’s name to see which groups he or she is af­fil­i­ated with.

Bridge Pro­ject, a non­profit af­fil­i­ated with the Demo­crat­ic su­per PAC Amer­ic­an Bridge, has been com­pil­ing the data­base of con­ser­vat­ive groups for sev­er­al years, but is now rolling out the web­site to make its in­form­a­tion more eas­ily ac­cess­ible for the pub­lic.

On Thursday, it is also re­leas­ing two re­ports based on the in­form­a­tion in its data­base. One is ba­sic­ally a cheat sheet of the top 33 con­ser­vat­ive play­ers in the coun­try, with a bit of back­ground in­form­a­tion on each. That in­cludes how much money they’ve been spent in the past few elec­tion cycles, what they do, who they have sup­por­ted, and oth­er rel­ev­ant facts.

The entry on the Koch-backed Amer­ic­ans for Prosper­ity, for ex­ample, states that the group spent $122 mil­lion in the 2012 elec­tion, only $36.4 mil­lion of which was re­por­ted to the Fed­er­al Elec­tion Com­mis­sion as “polit­ic­al” spend­ing.

The second re­port is the first in a com­ing series of state-based re­ports, which Bridge Pro­ject hopes will help drive its mes­sage home. Be­cause cam­paign fin­ance is­sues are ab­stract and dif­fi­cult to un­der­stand, the group is aim­ing to, as Vale says, “take it out of the kind of 10,000-foot cam­paign fin­ance world and put [it] in people’s daily lives.”

The re­port fo­cuses on North Car­o­lina, which Vale calls “ground zero” for out­side right-wing money. Re­pub­lic­ans took con­trol of both cham­bers of the swing state’s Le­gis­lature and gov­ernor­ship in 2010, end­ing a cen­tury-plus reign of the state’s Demo­crat­ic Party, and have since been busy en­act­ing a ver­it­able wish list of con­ser­vat­ive policy items. Don’t like that the state re­duced long-term-un­em­ploy­ment be­ne­fits? Blame the in­fra­struc­ture out­lined in this re­port, Vale says.

As Bridge Pro­ject sees it, the state is a “case study” for how deep-pock­eted play­ers can wield out­size in­flu­ence. “The GOP’s suc­cess in North Car­o­lina wasn’t merely a mir­ror of the tea-party wave that be­nefited Re­pub­lic­ans across the na­tion in 2010; it was part of a strategy craf­ted on the na­tion­al level and car­ried out with the co­oper­a­tion of prom­in­ent con­ser­vat­ive in­terest groups and donors, in­clud­ing the Koch broth­ers,” the re­port states.

One big caveat to all this data, Bridge Pro­ject ac­know­ledges, is that ex­ist­ing laws make it im­possible to track all the money out there. Money raised by re­cip­i­ents from un­known donors who are not in the data­base is not in­cluded, the web­site notes.

The oth­er big caveat is that Demo­crats, of course, have their own polit­ic­al non­profit groups — in­clud­ing Bridge Pro­ject. To be sure, con­ser­vat­ives have gen­er­ally had more re­sources in this area and have fought dis­clos­ure re­quire­ments, while sim­ul­tan­eously push­ing to loosen laws even fur­ther.

It’s an ad­mit­tedly in­com­plete pic­ture from a par­tis­an source, but in a no­tori­ously opaque world, this is at least one good flash­light.

What We're Following See More »
CYBER THREATS INCREASING
Clapper: ISIS Will Try to Attack U.S. This Year
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

“Leaders of the Islamic State are determined to strike targets in the United States this year,” Director of National Intelligence James Clapper told a congressional panel today. Clapper added that “al-Qaida, from which the Islamic State spun off, remains an enemy and the U.S. will continue to see cyber threats from China, Russia and North Korea, which also is ramping up its nuclear program.”

Source:
CLYBURN WEIGHING HIS OWN NOD
CBC PAC to Endorse Clinton This Morning
5 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The Congressional Black Caucus PAC will formally endorse Hillary Clinton this morning, and “nearly a dozen CBC colleagues will descend on” South Carolina next week in advance of that state’s important primary. Rep. Jim Clyburn (D-SC), the highest ranking black member of Congress, reversed his earlier position of neutrality, saying he’ll make a decision “later in the week.” Rep. Keith Ellison (D-MN) has pointed out that the CBC PAC is not the same things as the CBC itself, while the Intercept notes that 11 of the 20 board members of the PAC are lobbyists.

Source:
MORE TENSIONS ON KOREAN PENINSULA
Senate Votes 96-0 to Sanction North Korea
4 hours ago
THE LATEST

In a unanimous vote Wednesday night, the Senate echoed the House’s move last month to stiffen sanctions against North Korea. The bill “would sanction anyone who engages in, facilitates or contributes to North Korea’s proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, arms-related materials, luxury goods, human rights abuses, activities undermining cyber security and the provision of materials for such activities.” Senate Democrats said they expect the president to sign the bill. In related news, after South Korea suspended operations at a jointly run power station in the North, Pyongyang declared the area a military zone and cut off a hotline between the two countries.

Source:
THE QUESTION
How Large Is Hillary Clinton’s Delegate Lead?
4 hours ago
THE ANSWER

Three hundred fifty-two, thanks to superdelegates pledged to Clinton, and the vagaries of the delegate allocation process in early states. Not bad, considering her results have been a virtual tie and a blowout loss.

Source:
HE’D SIPHON OFF DEM VOTES
RNC Chief Would Welcome Bloomberg
3 hours ago
THE DETAILS

“The lead­ers of the Re­pub­lic­an and Demo­crat­ic na­tion­al com­mit­tees on Wed­nes­day weighed in on the pro­spect of an in­de­pend­ent pres­id­en­tial run by” former New York City May­or Mi­chael Bloomberg (I). “DNC Chair­wo­man Debbie Wasser­man Schultz sug­ges­ted that the former New York City may­or’s pri­or­it­ies are already ‘well cared-for’ in the Demo­crat­ic plat­form, while RNC lead­er Re­ince Priebus wel­comed the idea, say­ing Bloomberg would si­phon off votes from the Demo­crat­ic can­did­ate.”

Source:
×