The Grisly Origins of America’s Most Romantic Day of the Year

It wasn’t all chocolates and roses for the namesake of Valentine’s Day.

National Journal
Marina Koren
Feb. 14, 2014, 4:38 a.m.

Valentine’s Day is an oc­ca­sion to shower your sig­ni­fic­ant oth­er with flowers, chocol­ates, and, as one wise an­im­ated clock once said, prom­ises you don’t in­tend to keep.

Not the case cen­tur­ies ago. Long be­fore Valentine’s Day be­came Hall­mark’s hol­i­day, Feb. 14 marked the day a Ro­man priest was beaten with clubs, stoned, and be­headed for his at­tempts to pro­tect people’s right to get mar­ried.

The ori­gin of St. Valentine, and how many St. Valentines there ac­tu­ally were, re­mains a mys­tery. One was a Ro­man priest, an­oth­er an Itali­an bish­op, and a third was a cler­gy­man in Africa. None of them met happy end­ings, and all sup­posedly per­ished on Feb. 14. “Like love it­self, the start of the cel­eb­ra­tion is some­what con­fus­ing,” Ren­ee Bronaugh ap­pro­pri­ately de­scribed the murky his­tory in Mis­souri’s Daily Journ­al.

The Chris­ti­an saint most as­so­ci­ated with Valentine’s Day lived in third-cen­tury Rome, around 270 A.D. It was a per­il­ous time: Ro­man of­fi­cials per­se­cuted Chris­ti­ans for their be­liefs, poor gov­ern­ing led to con­stant do­mest­ic strife, and the threat of in­va­sion from out­side tribes loomed large.

De­term­ined to pre­serve his em­pire, Claudi­us II re­solved to build a power­ful army, but he ran in­to a prob­lem: Not enough sol­diers were en­list­ing. The em­per­or pos­ited that Ro­man men wanted to stay with their wives and fam­il­ies rather than go to war. Single men, he be­lieved, made for bet­ter sol­diers. And so Claudi­us re­putedly banned all mar­riages and en­gage­ments in the city.

Valentine, a Chris­ti­an priest, be­lieved the de­cree vi­ol­ated cit­izen’s rights, and he con­tin­ued to marry couples in secret. When the em­per­or dis­covered the black-mar­ket ce­re­mon­ies, he had Valentine im­prisoned. Dur­ing ques­tion­ing, Valentine de­nounced the Ro­man gods and tried to per­suade Claudi­us to con­vert to Chris­tian­ity, which out­raged the em­per­or. Valentine was sub­sequently sen­tenced to death for his crimes.

Le­gend has it that while he awaited his sen­tence, Valentine fell in love with the jail­er’s daugh­ter, a blind young wo­man named Ju­lia, and re­stored her sight. His last words, the story goes, were in a note to her be­fore his ex­e­cu­tion, signed “from your Valentine.”

Valentine was even­tu­ally named a mar­tyr by the Church for giv­ing up his life to per­form the sac­ra­ment of mar­riage.

But the story of how Valentine’s name be­came linked with ro­mance re­mains un­clear. The date of his death may have co­in­cided with the Feast of Lu­per­calia, a pa­gan fest­iv­al of love.

In 496 A.D., Pope Gelasi­us de­cided to put an end to the feast, and named Feb. 14 the feast day for St. Valentine in hon­or of the fallen priest. The 14th-cen­tury Eng­lish poet Geof­frey Chau­cer was the first to call the date “Valentine’s Day,” in his love poem, “The Par­lia­ment of Fowls.”

St. Valentine’s leg­acy took a hit in 1969. A lack of in­form­a­tion doc­u­ment­ing his life, as well as con­fu­sion over the hol­i­day’s ori­gins, led the Cath­ol­ic Church to drop St. Valentine’s Day from the Ro­man cal­en­dar of of­fi­cial feasts.

Of­fi­cial stand­ing in the Cath­ol­ic can­on or not, Valentine’s Day makes out well these days. An es­tim­ated 224 mil­lion roses are grown for the hol­i­day each year in the U.S. Amer­ic­ans will spend $1.6 bil­lion on candy, $1.9 bil­lion on flowers, and a whop­ping $4.4 bil­lion on jew­elry. They’ll also buy about 145 mil­lion cards for their Valentines.

They’re prob­ably not think­ing about one priest’s hor­rif­ic end cen­tur­ies ago as they shop, but they’re likely be­stow­ing their gifts in the name of what he died for.

What We're Following See More »
THE 1%
Sanders’s Appeals to Minorities Still Filtered Through Wall Street Talk
52 minutes ago
WHY WE CARE

It’s all about the 1% and Wall Street versus everyone else for Bernie Sanders—even when he’s talking about race relations. Like Hillary Clinton, he needs to appeal to African-American and Hispanic voters in coming states, but he insists on doing so through his lens of class warfare. When he got a question from the moderators about the plight of black America, he noted that during the great recession, African Americans “lost half their wealth,” and “instead of tax breaks for billionaires,” a Sanders presidency would deliver jobs for kids. On the very next question, he downplayed the role of race in inequality, saying, “It’s a racial issue, but it’s also a general economic issue.”

DIRECT APPEAL TO MINORITIES, WOMEN
Clinton Already Pivoting Her Messaging
1 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

It’s been said in just about every news story since New Hampshire: the primaries are headed to states where Hillary Clinton will do well among minority voters. Leaving nothing to chance, she underscored that point in her opening statement in the Milwaukee debate tonight, saying more needs to be done to help “African Americans who face discrimination in the job market” and immigrant families. She also made an explicit reference to “equal pay for women’s work.” Those boxes she’s checking are no coincidence: if she wins women, blacks and Hispanics, she wins the nomination.

THE QUESTION
How Many Jobs Would Be Lost Under Bernie Sanders’s Single-Payer System?
9 hours ago
THE ANSWER

More than 11 million, according to Manhattan Institute fellow Yevgeniy Feyman, writing in RealClearPolicy.

Source:
WEEKEND DATA DUMP
State to Release 550 More Clinton Emails on Saturday
9 hours ago
THE LATEST

Under pressure from a judge, the State Department will release about 550 of Hillary Clinton’s emails—“roughly 14 percent of the 3,700 remaining Clinton emails—on Saturday, in the middle of the Presidents Day holiday weekend.” All of the emails were supposed to have been released last month. Related: State subpoenaed the Clinton Foundation last year, which brings the total number of current Clinton investigations to four, says the Daily Caller.

Source:
LATER TO THIS YEAR’S NADER
Jim Webb Rules Out Independent Bid
9 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

UPDATED: Sen. Jim Webb (D-VA) will not be playing the role of Ralph Nader in this year’s election. Speaking in Dallas today, Webb said, “We looked at the possibility of an independent candidacy. Theoretically, it could be done, but it is enormously costly and time sensitive, and I don’t see the fundraising trajectory where we could make a realistic run.”

Source:
×