Liberal Donors Putting Their Personal Agendas Ahead of the Democratic Party

By targeting moderate Democrats on energy and gun control, the Left is helping Republicans retake the Senate.

NEW ORLEANS - MAY 3: Louisiana Senator Mary Landrieu shakes hands with a supporter during a swearing in ceremony for her brother Mitchell Landrieu, who is now Mayor of New Orleans May 3, 2010 in New Orleans, Louisiana. Mayor Landrieu is inheriting a host of disaster related issues from Hurricane Katrina and the current oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico as he takes over for Mayor Ray Nagin.
National Journal
Alex Roarty
Feb. 10, 2014, midnight

When bil­lion­aire en­vir­on­ment­al act­iv­ist Tom Stey­er un­veiled a list of five sen­at­ors he would tar­get over their sup­port for the Key­stone XL pipeline, one name stood out. Sen. Mary Landrieu of Louisi­ana was the only Demo­crat in his crosshairs, and her cam­paign is of vi­tal im­port­ance to Demo­crat­ic strategists. In­deed, her reelec­tion may de­cide wheth­er Demo­crats are able to hold their Sen­ate ma­jor­ity.

Stey­er might yet take the ads else­where — his polit­ic­al group, Nex­t­Gen Cli­mate Ac­tion, said it will only go after one of the five law­makers any­way. But his threat tugs at a deep­er frus­tra­tion roil­ing the Demo­crat­ic polit­ic­al com­munity: Even as the party is badly out­spent in the early go­ing of the 2014 elec­tion, some of their top donors have yet to awaken to the threat. In fact, like Stey­er, the party’s rich be­ne­fact­ors are put­ting their single-is­sue cru­sades ahead of the party’s great­er in­terests.

Take Mi­chael Bloomberg. The former New York City may­or’s group formed to com­bat gun vi­ol­ence, May­ors Against Il­leg­al Guns, spent $350,000 last year as­sail­ing an­oth­er en­dangered Demo­crat, Sen. Mark Pry­or of Arkan­sas, over his op­pos­i­tion to a gun-con­trol bill. In a small state, that counts as a heavy buy against an in­cum­bent who can barely hold off at­tacks from Re­pub­lic­ans.

It’s left the Demo­crat­ic strategists plot­ting the Sen­ate races scratch­ing their heads. While Demo­crats aren’t fa­cing the deep in­tern­al di­vi­sions plaguing Re­pub­lic­ans, it only takes a few wealthy lib­er­als to cre­ate holy hell in the party’s most con­sequen­tial Sen­ate races.

“I say over and over, ‘Lord pro­tect me from my friends so I can fo­cus on my en­emies,’ ” said Ben Chao, a Demo­crat­ic op­er­at­ive who runs a su­per PAC sup­port­ing Landrieu and Pry­or. “This is an ap­par­ent case of that.”

Chao and oth­ers say they don’t worry too much about Bloomberg’s spend­ing it­self, which is min­im­al, but rather the mind-set it be­trays. The party’s con­trol of the Sen­ate is in deep danger, and Demo­crats need money to ramp up their cam­paigns — es­pe­cially from their here­to­fore un­der­fun­ded out­side groups — now. Ef­forts from sup­posed al­lies that are coun­ter­pro­duct­ive, to them, verge on the un­think­able.

“It’s ter­rible tim­ing,” said Mor­gan Jack­son, a Raleigh-based Demo­crat­ic strategist un­af­fili­ated with Sen. Kay Hagan’s cam­paign in North Car­o­lina. “The fact of mat­ters is “¦ it is very short­sighted polit­ics.”

Jack­son and oth­er North Car­o­lina Demo­crats would know best. Amer­ic­ans for Prosper­ity, a non­profit group bank­rolled in part by the in­dus­tri­al­ists Charles and Dav­id Koch, has in­ves­ted more than $8 mil­lion in ads there tar­get­ing Hagan. The ad buys, the largest of the roughly $27 mil­lion the or­gan­iz­a­tion has already spent this elec­tion cycle, have co­in­cided with a drop in sup­port for the sen­at­or, ac­cord­ing to sev­er­al pub­lic polls.

Demo­crat­ic groups haven’t been en­tirely si­lent: Sen­ate Ma­jor­ity PAC has run ads de­fend­ing Hagan, and Politico re­por­ted Thursday that the non­profit Pat­ri­ot Ma­jor­ity USA would take to the air­waves in the Tar Heel State. But their ad buys are dwarfed by AFP’s.

Stey­er, if he chose to fo­cus on main­tain­ing a Sen­ate Demo­crat­ic ma­jor­ity, could help change that. Ac­cord­ing to spokes­man Chris Le­hane, he spent $8.5 mil­lion last year help­ing elect Vir­gin­ia Demo­crat­ic Gov. Terry McAul­iffe. That was on top of the nearly $5 mil­lion he spent in the Mas­sachu­setts spe­cial elec­tion last year to as­sist now-Sen. Ed­ward Mar­key — both in the primary and gen­er­al.

But, as Le­hane ex­plains, Stey­er wants to use his fin­an­cial muscle to coun­ter­bal­ance what he per­ceives as the oil in­dustry’s polit­ic­al might. And for now, that means tar­get­ing sup­port­ers of the Key­stone pipeline, a list that in­cludes Landrieu, the new chair­wo­man of the Sen­ate En­ergy Com­mit­tee. “The fossil-fuel in­dustry has been enorm­ously sup­port­ive of folks, es­pe­cially folks sup­port­ive of the pipeline,” Stey­er’s spokes­man said.

(Le­hane said the pro­posed ad would ask voters wheth­er the sen­at­or knows if oil pumped through the pipeline will be used do­mest­ic­ally or be shipped to China. Nex­t­Gen is ask­ing people who vis­it its web­site to vote for which law­maker the com­mit­tee should tar­get.)

Demo­crats re­main pub­licly con­fid­ent that, even­tu­ally, their donors will come around.

Bloomberg’s spend­ing against Pry­or ruffled feath­ers, but he has re­portedly giv­en Sen­ate Ma­jor­ity PAC $2.5 mil­lion since — sev­en times the amount he in­ves­ted against Pry­or (money that, iron­ic­ally, could be used to help the Demo­crat’s cam­paign). Sources fa­mil­i­ar with Stey­er’s think­ing say he could soon fol­low suit, as­sum­ing he’s sat­is­fied the Sen­ate Demo­crat­ic caucus re­mains com­mit­ted to the cli­mate-change fight.

“We are look­ing to be ex­cep­tion­ally sup­port­ive of the ef­fort to make sure Demo­crats re­tain the Sen­ate,” the source said.

Demo­crats will be pleased to hear that. Be­cause at the mo­ment, their frus­tra­tion is about to boil over.

“So far, we’re hear­ing crick­ets chirp,” said Brad Crone, an­oth­er Raleigh-based Demo­crat­ic Party op­er­at­ive. “Right now, [donors] are pea­cock­ing, they got the feath­ers out, but they’re not put­ting any money down to buy TV ad­vert­ising.”

What We're Following See More »
SHE’LL HAVE A ROLE WITH CLINTON CAMP
Wasserman Schultz to Resign at Week’s End
4 hours ago
THE LATEST

"After hours of private talks," Debbie Wasserman Schultz agreed to step down as chair of the Democratic National Committee after the convention ends. In the wake of the convention intrigue, Hillary Clinton announced she's making Wasserman Schultz "the honorary chair of her campaign's 50-state program."

Source:
MARCIA FUDGE TO PRESIDE
Wasserman Schultz Stripped of Convention Duties
12 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Democratic National Committee Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz "will not have a major speaking role or preside over daily convention proceedings this week," and is under increasing pressure to resign. The DNC Rules Committee on Saturday named Ohio Democratic Rep. Marcia Fudge as "permanent chair of the convention." At issue: internal DNC emails leaked by Wikileaks that show how "the DNC favored Clinton during the primary and tried to take down Bernie Sanders by questioning his religion."

Source:
EARLY BUMP FOR TRUMP?
New Round of Polls Show a Tight Race
2 days ago
THE LATEST
  • A Rasmussen Reports poll shows Donald Trump ahead of Hillary Clinton, 43%-42%, the fourth week in a row he's led the poll (one of the few poll in which he's led consistently of late).
  • A Reuters/Ipsos survey shows Clinton leading 40%-36%. In a four-way race, she maintains her four-point lead, 39%-35%, with Gary Johnson and Jill Stein pulling 7% and 3%, respectively.
  • And the LA Times/USC daily tracking poll shows a dead heat, with Trump ahead by about half a percentage point.
BELLWETHER?
Candidates Deadlocked in Ohio
3 days ago
THE LATEST
17-POINT EDGE AMONG MILLENNIALS
Clinton Dominates Among Younger Voters
3 days ago
THE DETAILS

In an election between two candidates around 70 years of age, millennials strongly prefer one over the other. Hillary Clinton has a 47%-30% edge among votes 18 to 29. She also leads 46%-36% among voters aged 30 to 44.

Source:
×