Chris Christie Sticks to His Story: ‘I Had Nothing to Do With This’

The New Jersey governor said in an interview that he still doesn’t even know if a traffic study was done.

NRCC keynoter: N.J. Gov. Chris Christie
National Journal
Jack Fitzpatrick
See more stories about...
Jack Fitzpatrick
Feb. 3, 2014, 3:55 p.m.

New Jer­sey Gov. Chris Christie took ques­tions Monday about the “Bridgeg­ate” scan­dal fol­low­ing a new ac­cus­a­tion from a Port Au­thor­ity of­fi­cial. And nearly a month after first ad­dress­ing the top­ic, his main point was the same.

“I had noth­ing to do with this,” Christie said in an in­ter­view with loc­al ra­dio sta­tion NJ 101.5. “No know­ledge, no au­thor­iz­a­tion, no plan­ning, noth­ing.”

Christie did not spe­cific­ally ad­dress the claims made by Dav­id Wild­stein, a Port Au­thor­ity of­fi­cial whose law­yer said last week that there’s evid­ence Christie knew about lane clos­ures on the George Wash­ing­ton Bridge as they happened in Septem­ber.

But on Monday, Christie re­peatedly said he had no part in the plot. He re­coun­ted how he learned of the scan­dal, say­ing he was told the lanes were closed for a traffic study and that he knew noth­ing about polit­ic­al re­venge against Fort Lee May­or Mark Soko­lich un­til he read about it in The Wall Street Journ­al on Jan. 8.

In fact, Christie said, he still does not know if a traffic study was done.

“I still don’t know wheth­er there was a traffic study that morph­ed in­to some polit­ic­al shenanigans,” he said. “Or did it start as some polit­ic­al shenanigans that turned in­to a traffic study?”

Christie has em­phat­ic­ally in­sisted that in­form­a­tion about lane clos­ures would not have made it up to his of­fice and that his aides could have taken the ac­tion en­tirely without his know­ledge. He im­me­di­ately fired Brid­get Anne Kelly, a deputy chief of staff, after news of the scheme broke.

When asked by in­ter­view­er Eric Scott about how his of­fice could have sought re­tri­bu­tion against a may­or without his know­ledge, Christie re­it­er­ated that he del­eg­ated enough au­thor­ity so that he would not have known any­thing about traffic is­sues.

“Let’s face it, Eric. There’s traffic every day,” he said.

Christie also said the me­dia has fo­cused more than the pub­lic on the scan­dal, a point some­what val­id­ated by the fact that no listen­ers called in with more ques­tions on the lane-clos­ings. He answered ques­tions on a wide range of top­ics, in­clud­ing pen­sion re­form, in­come taxes, and land­lord com­plaints.

Des­pite doubts about Christie’s polit­ic­al fu­ture, in­clud­ing his chances in the 2016 pres­id­en­tial elec­tion, Christie said he’s con­fid­ent that he’s still pop­u­lar among New Jer­sey voters.

“They know the truth,” Christie said. “They know me. They just reelec­ted me re­sound­ingly.”

What We're Following See More »
1.5 MILLION MORE TUNED IN FOR TRUMP
More People Watched Trump’s Acceptance Speech
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

Hillary Clinton hopes that television ratings for the candidates' acceptance speeches at their respective conventions aren't foreshadowing of similar results at the polls in November. Preliminary results from the networks and cable channels show that 34.9 million people tuned in for Donald Trump's acceptance speech while 33.3 million watched Clinton accept the Democratic nomination. However, it is still possible that the numbers are closer than these ratings suggest: the numbers don't include ratings from PBS or CSPAN, which tend to attract more Democratic viewers.

Source:
×