New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie took questions Monday about the “Bridgegate” scandal following a new accusation from a Port Authority official. And nearly a month after first addressing the topic, his main point was the same.
“I had nothing to do with this,” Christie said in an interview with local radio station NJ 101.5. “No knowledge, no authorization, no planning, nothing.”
Christie did not specifically address the claims made by David Wildstein, a Port Authority official whose lawyer said last week that there’s evidence Christie knew about lane closures on the George Washington Bridge as they happened in September.
But on Monday, Christie repeatedly said he had no part in the plot. He recounted how he learned of the scandal, saying he was told the lanes were closed for a traffic study and that he knew nothing about political revenge against Fort Lee Mayor Mark Sokolich until he read about it in The Wall Street Journal on Jan. 8.
In fact, Christie said, he still does not know if a traffic study was done.
“I still don’t know whether there was a traffic study that morphed into some political shenanigans,” he said. “Or did it start as some political shenanigans that turned into a traffic study?”
Christie has emphatically insisted that information about lane closures would not have made it up to his office and that his aides could have taken the action entirely without his knowledge. He immediately fired Bridget Anne Kelly, a deputy chief of staff, after news of the scheme broke.
When asked by interviewer Eric Scott about how his office could have sought retribution against a mayor without his knowledge, Christie reiterated that he delegated enough authority so that he would not have known anything about traffic issues.
“Let’s face it, Eric. There’s traffic every day,” he said.
Christie also said the media has focused more than the public on the scandal, a point somewhat validated by the fact that no listeners called in with more questions on the lane-closings. He answered questions on a wide range of topics, including pension reform, income taxes, and landlord complaints.
Despite doubts about Christie’s political future, including his chances in the 2016 presidential election, Christie said he’s confident that he’s still popular among New Jersey voters.
“They know the truth,” Christie said. “They know me. They just reelected me resoundingly.”
What We're Following See More »
"Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx has appointed a veteran legal insider with strong personal ties to the Obama administration to serve as his special adviser focused exclusively on fixing the Washington region’s troubled Metro system. Kathryn Thomson, who was expected to leave her job as the Department of Transportation’s top lawyer, instead will stay on as Foxx’s special adviser on Metro oversight." She'll start this week.
"The Supreme Court on Monday ruled that prosecutors in Georgia violated the Constitution by striking every black prospective juror in a death penalty case against a black defendant. The vote was 7 to 1, with Justice Clarence Thomas dissenting. The case, Foster v. Chatman, No. 14-8349, arose from the 1987 trial of Timothy T. Foster, an African-American facing the death penalty for killing Queen Madge White, an elderly white woman, when he was 18."
A report from House Democrats charges that NFL officials retracted funding for a $16 million NIH study on head injuries after repeated unsuccessful attempts to direct the money away from a Boston University researcher and instead to scientists who might be more favorable to the league. Democrats have been trying to go after the NFL over its handling of concussion science, although the sport's popularity and increased lobbying presence has made that difficult. The new revelations about meddling in the NIH study should offer more ammo.
"A unanimous Supreme Court has dismissed a Republican appeal over congressional districts in Virginia. The justices on Monday left in place a decision by a lower court that said Virginia illegally packed black voters into one district to make adjacent districts safer for Republican incumbents." The Court said the Republican elected officials who challenged the decision did not have standing to do so.