Former Ally: Chris Christie Knew About Bridgegate ‘When the Lanes Were Closed’

If the allegations prove true, the governor’s pleas of ignorance may now come back to hurt him.

EAST RUTHERFORD, NJ - JANUARY 29: New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie speaks at a press conference announcing new objectives to crack down on human and sex trafficking throughout the state of New Jersey, inspired in part by the upcoming Super Bowl, on January 29, 2014 in East Rutherford, New Jersey. Christie Spoke along side New Jersey Attorney General John Hoffman and Cindy McCain, wife of Arizona Senator John McCain. The Super Bowl will be played at MetLife Stadium in East Rutherford, NJ, this Sunday, February 2, 2014. (Photo by Andrew Burton/Getty Images)
National Journal
Brian Resnick Marina Koren Sarah Mimms
Jan. 31, 2014, 11:02 a.m.

When Dav­id Wild­stein, a Chris Christie-ap­poin­ted of­fi­cial at the Port Au­thor­ity, pleaded the Fifth dur­ing a hear­ing about the bridge-clos­ure scan­dal earli­er this month, spec­u­la­tion aboun­ded that he had something to hide. Now, ac­cord­ing to a let­ter from his law­yer, it looks like he did.

The let­ter, ob­tained by The New York Times, sug­gests that the or­der to close the bridge was “the Christie ad­min­is­tra­tion’s or­der” and that “evid­ence ex­ists as well ty­ing Mr. Christie to hav­ing know­ledge of the lane clos­ures, dur­ing the peri­od when the lanes were closed, con­trary to what the gov­ernor stated pub­licly in a two-hour press con­fer­ence.”

In the let­ter, pub­lished by The Wall Street Journ­al on Fri­day, Wild­stein’s lay­wer writes that his cli­ent “con­tests the ac­cur­acy of vari­ous state­ments that the gov­ernor made about him and he can prove the in­ac­cur­acy of some.”

Christie re­spon­ded to the let­ter in a state­ment late Fri­day af­ter­noon.

“Mr. Wild­stein’s law­yer con­firms what the Gov­ernor has said all along — he had ab­so­lutely no pri­or know­ledge of the lane clos­ures be­fore they happened and whatever Mr. Wild­stein’s mo­tiv­a­tions were for clos­ing them to be­gin with,” the state­ment read

Dur­ing his mara­thon press con­fer­ence on Jan. 9, Gov. Chris Christie said he was “em­bar­rassed and hu­mi­li­ated” by the lane clos­ures, and in­sisted that he only learned of his of­fice’s in­volve­ment the same day the pub­lic did, through leaked email cor­res­pond­ence, just the day be­fore. “I was blind­sided,” he told the re­port­ers.

At a Jan. 9 hear­ing be­fore the New Jer­sey Le­gis­lature about the scan­dal, Wild­stein re­fused to an­swer ques­tions, cit­ing his right to re­main si­lent un­der the Fifth Amend­ment, which promp­ted the Le­gis­lature to hold him in con­tempt.

But the point of this let­ter was not to ex­plain Wild­stein’s earli­er si­lence, or even to take a stab at Christie’s deni­als. Wild­stein’s law­yer wrote the let­ter to con­test the Port Au­thor­ity’s de­cision to not cov­er Wild­stein’s leg­al fees as the in­vest­ig­a­tion in­to the bridge clos­ure con­tin­ues.

In Au­gust, the gov­ernor’s deputy chief of staff sent Wild­stein a note that read, “Time for some traffic prob­lems in Fort Lee.” Wild­stein wrote back, “Got it.”

Wild­stein resigned from the po­s­i­tion of dir­ect­or of In­ter­state Cap­it­al Pro­jects at the Port Au­thor­ity in Decem­ber amid grow­ing con­tro­versy about the lane clos­ures. “My plan was to leave the agency at some point next year, but the Fort Lee is­sue has been a dis­trac­tion, and I think it’s bet­ter to move on earli­er,” he said at the time.

Shawn Boburg, the Re­cord re­port­er who broke the ori­gin­al story, told CNN that Wild­stein was a long­time Christie con­fid­ant, the “eyes and ears in­side this massive agency.” Christie’s ver­sion of his re­la­tion­ship with Wild­stein is any­thing but. “Dav­id and I were not friends in high school,” he said Thursday. “I was the class pres­id­ent and ath­lete. I don’t know what Dav­id was do­ing dur­ing that peri­od of time.”

What We're Following See More »
BACKING OUT ON BERNIE
Trump Won’t Debate Sanders After All
2 days ago
THE LATEST

Trump, in a statement: “Based on the fact that the Democratic nominating process is totally rigged and Crooked Hillary Clinton and Deborah Wasserman Schultz will not allow Bernie Sanders to win, and now that I am the presumptive Republican nominee, it seems inappropriate that I would debate the second place finisher. ... I will wait to debate the first place finisher in the Democratic Party, probably Crooked Hillary Clinton, or whoever it may be.”

AKNOWLEDGING THE INEVITABLE
UAW: Time to Unite Behind Hillary
3 days ago
THE DETAILS

"It's about time for unity," said UAW President Dennis Williams. "We're endorsing Hillary Clinton. She's gotten 3 million more votes than Bernie, a million more votes than Donald Trump. She's our nominee." He called Sanders "a great friend of the UAW" while saying Trump "does not support the economic security of UAW families." Some 28 percent of UAW members indicated their support for Trump in an internal survey.

Source:
AP KEEPING COUNT
Trump Clinches Enough Delegates for the Nomination
3 days ago
THE LATEST

"Donald Trump on Thursday reached the number of delegates needed to clinch the Republican nomination for president, completing an unlikely rise that has upended the political landscape and sets the stage for a bitter fall campaign. Trump was put over the top in the Associated Press delegate count by a small number of the party's unbound delegates who told the AP they would support him at the convention."

Source:
TRUMP FLOATED IDEA ON JIMMY KIMMEL’S SHOW
Trump/Sanders Debate Before California Primary?
3 days ago
THE LATEST
CAMPAIGNS INJECTED NEW AD MONEY
California: It’s Not Over Yet
3 days ago
THE LATEST

"Clinton and Bernie Sanders "are now devoting additional money to television advertising. A day after Sanders announced a new ad buy of less than $2 million in the state, Clinton announced her own television campaign. Ads featuring actor Morgan Freeman as well as labor leader and civil rights activist Dolores Huerta will air beginning on Fridayin Fresno, Sacramento, and Los Angeles media markets. Some ads will also target Latino voters and Asian American voters. The total value of the buy is about six figures according to the Clinton campaign." Meanwhile, a new poll shows Sanders within the margin of error, trailing Clinton 44%-46%.

Source:
×