Democratic Governors and Statehouse Candidates to Adopt Obama’s Minimum-Wage Message

A memo shared with National Journal shows Democratic governors intend to make the wage hike a top priority this fall, betting they’ve found a GOP vulnerability.

Low wage workers wearing Santa hats join with supporters of an increase in the minimum wage during a protest outside the Air and Space Museum December 5, 2013 in Washington, DC.
National Journal
Alex Seitz-Wald
Jan. 29, 2014, 4:45 a.m.

Demo­crat­ic gov­ernors and can­did­ates com­pet­ing in battle­ground states are plan­ning to make a min­im­um-wage in­crease a center­piece of this year’s cam­paigns, tak­ing the bat­on from Pres­id­ent Obama’s State of the Uni­on ad­dress Tues­day night, ac­cord­ing to a memo shared with Na­tion­al Journ­al.

Rais­ing the wage was a core part of Obama’s lar­ger theme of boost­ing “op­por­tun­ity” for all, and it’s a policy that Demo­crats run­ning for state­houses think will help them polit­ic­ally, ac­cord­ing to the memo from the Demo­crat­ic Gov­ernors As­so­ci­ation.

“No is­sue bet­ter crys­tal­izes the broad­er de­bate between 2014 Demo­crat­ic and Re­pub­lic­an gubernat­ori­al can­did­ates than that of a min­im­um wage hike,” DGA Com­mu­nic­a­tions Dir­ect­or Danny Kan­ner says in the memo.

This is a big year for the Demo­crat­ic Gov­ernors As­so­ci­ation, giv­en the num­ber of Re­pub­lic­an gov­ernors swept in dur­ing the 2010 wave who are now up for reelec­tion.

Re­pub­lic­an gov­ernors from Flor­ida to Wis­con­sin have con­sist­ently op­posed ef­forts to raise the min­im­um wage, and Dems think that choice will come back to bite the GOP. The DGA points to a re­cent Wall Street Journ­al poll show­ing 63 per­cent of Amer­ic­ans sup­port rais­ing the wage and a sep­ar­ate Quin­nipi­ac poll show­ing a plur­al­ity of Re­pub­lic­an voters agree.

While it’s not sur­pris­ing that Demo­crats would echo the pres­id­ent on a cent­ral policy goal, rais­ing the min­im­um wage has un­til re­cently been seen as the do­main of the party’s pro­gress­ive wing and an is­sue that can­did­ates in battle­ground states might shy away from.

But that doesn’t seem to be the case when it comes to a hand­ful of gubernat­ori­al races, at least. In Maine, while Re­pub­lic­an Gov. Paul LePage has ve­toed le­gis­la­tion to raise the min­im­um wage, Rep. Mi­chael Michaud, the pre­sumed Demo­crat­ic nom­in­ee, co­sponsored a bill in the House to raise the wage na­tion­wide.

Demo­crat Mark Schauer, who is hop­ing to oust Michigan Gov. Rick Snyder, has pro­posed boost­ing the wage to $9.25 an hour and in­dex­ing it to in­fla­tion, and said he would make hik­ing it a top pri­or­ity if elec­ted.

In Iowa, Jack Hatch wants to go even fur­ther and raise the wage to $10.10, which would give the im­port­ant polit­ic­al state the highest min­im­um wage in the coun­try. Charlie Crist, the Re­pub­lic­an-turned-Demo­crat former gov­ernor, who is run­ning to re­claim his old seat in Flor­ida’s state­house, also sup­ports set­ting the wage at $10.10.

Mean­while in Illinois, where Demo­crats are hop­ing to de­fend Gov. Pat Quinn as he heads in­to a tough reelec­tion battle, all four Re­pub­lic­an chal­lengers op­pose Quinn’s pro­pos­al to boost the wage.

And Demo­crats think the mes­sage will res­on­ate as well in red­der states like Kan­sas, where they’re hop­ing to push aside Re­pub­lic­an Gov. Sam Brown­back.

Kan­ner says Demo­crats will use the min­im­um wage to present a lar­ger eco­nom­ic mes­sage.

“These are two starkly dif­fer­ent eco­nom­ic philo­sophies, and the min­im­um wage de­bate makes that clear. In this case, Demo­crats are stand­ing with the Amer­ic­an people while Re­pub­lic­ans, once again, thumb their nose at them,” he said.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
6 hours ago
NATIONAL JOURNAL AFTER DARK

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Source:
STATE VS. FEDERAL
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
6 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
6 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
6 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
7 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”

Source:
×