Obamacare’s Unlikely Winners

Dems hope these tales of success post-insurance cancellations will take the wind out of critics’ sails.

US President Barack Obama gives an address during South African former president Nelson Mandela's memorial service at the FNB Stadium (Soccer City) in Johannesburg on December 10, 2013.
National Journal
Lucia Graves
See more stories about...
Lucia Graves
Dec. 17, 2013, 6:12 a.m.

Sue Spanke of Mis­soula, Mont., was highly dis­pleased this fall when she learned her health in­sur­ance had been can­celed.

“I got so mad that I went to my phone and star­ted call­ing all the polit­ic­al people and giv­ing them what for,” Spanke told The Billings Gaz­ette. That was be­fore she learned she was eli­gible for a policy at a much lower cost.

After an­grily call­ing her state aud­it­or’s of­fice, Spanke, a self-em­ployed artist in her 50s, found she was eli­gible for a fed­er­al sub­sidy. Her new in­sur­ance will cov­er her for a mere $30 to $40 a month with a de­duct­ible of only $500. She had been pay­ing $350 a month for a Blue Cross policy with a $5,000 de­duct­ible. “I went from a hor­rible policy that didn’t cov­er any­thing, that was break­ing me, to the best policy at the best price I’ve had since I was in my 20s,” she said.

With the web­site largely fixed, one of the last lines of at­tack against Obama­care is that the pres­id­ent lied when he said if people like their in­sur­ance plans, they can keep them. The White House is hop­ing stor­ies like Spanke’s will in­ocu­late them against those ar­gu­ments. And the pos­it­ive stor­ies abound.

An­oth­er man in­ter­viewed by The Billings Gaz­ette, Gary Mer­mel, said he re­ceived can­cel­la­tion no­tices for his fam­ily’s Blue Cross policies only to find later that he and his fam­ily were eli­gible for much more af­ford­able in­sur­ance. Mer­mel, a re­tired phys­i­cian with a preex­ist­ing health con­di­tion, had been pay­ing al­most $1,700 a month to cov­er his fam­ily, and last month Blue Cross in­formed him his rates would go up to nearly $2,100 a month for the re­mainder of the year. Un­der the Af­ford­able Care Act he was able to find in­sur­ance cov­er­ing his en­tire fam­ily for just $1,200 a month with com­par­able be­ne­fits and a lower de­duct­ible than he’d had pre­vi­ously.

He also won’t have to worry about be­ing denied cov­er­age or get­ting charged more for preex­ist­ing con­di­tions. “Be­fore, the in­sur­ance com­pan­ies had full con­trol,” he said. “They were al­lowed to place people at risk [of fin­an­cial ru­in] and they no longer can do that.”

Oth­er loc­al out­lets have doc­u­mented the suc­cess post-in­sur­ance can­cel­la­tion stor­ies as well.

In Lan­caster, Pa., Lori Lap­man, 58, learned her health plan was be­ing can­celed in Septem­ber — by Oc­to­ber things were look­ing up. Per The Sunday News: “Sit­ting at a laptop with a cer­ti­fied health law help­er, Lap­man went to Health­Care.gov, found it run­ning smoothly, and bought a sub­sid­ized High­mark plan that al­lows her to keep her doc­tors while sav­ing her money. Her can­celed plan cost her $520 a month. Her new cov­er­age? Only $111.73.”

In Har­ris­burg, Pa., The Pat­ri­ot News doc­u­mented the case of Lynn Keltz, one of the hun­dreds of thou­sands na­tion­wide who re­ceived a can­cel­la­tion no­tice. Keitz, who hap­pens to be one of the fed­er­ally fun­ded nav­ig­at­ors help­ing state res­id­ents find new cov­er­age un­der the Af­ford­able Care Act, said her new policy provides her bet­ter cov­er­age and costs $80 per month less.

In a let­ter to the ed­it­or in The Santa Maria Times, Al­lan Pacela told the story of how after his wife lost her in­sur­ance this fall, she found much bet­ter cov­er­age un­der Obama­care. The couple is now sav­ing $8,000 per year for a “much bet­ter plan.”

These stor­ies can be found in na­tion­al me­dia out­lets as well. The Huff­ing­ton Post re­layed the story of an HIV pa­tient from Michigan who, after learn­ing his old plan was can­celed, found a cheap­er plan un­der Obama­care with bet­ter cov­er­age (not to men­tion he got it with a preex­ist­ing con­di­tion). Mean­while, NPR told the story of 58-year-old Doug Norm­ing­ton, who, after re­ceiv­ing a can­cel­la­tion let­ter, found a plan that will cost him half what he had been pay­ing in premi­ums and a third the de­duct­ible. An­oth­er NPR story in­ter­viewed a num­ber of Cali­for­ni­ans who greeted their can­celed in­sur­ance policies with smiles. And The New York Times ran the story of Stephanie Lin­coln, who, with the help of a nav­ig­at­or signed up for cov­er­age cost­ing $113 a month with no de­duct­ible. The en­tire pro­cess took just one hour. “I am one of the people whose plans were can­celed,” she said. “It was just the easi­est thing in the world.”

No doubt there will be some Obama­care losers — most of them healthy, wealthy people who will have to pay a bit more. And there will be plenty of liber­tari­an crit­ics who will de­nounce the per­ceived pa­ter­nal­ism of the situ­ation. But there is no short­age of win­ners.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
8 hours ago
NATIONAL JOURNAL AFTER DARK

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Source:
STATE VS. FEDERAL
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
8 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
8 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
8 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
9 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”

Source:
×