The Tea Party Has Already Won

Conservative challengers may lose every Republican primary in 2014. Here’s why it doesn’t really matter.

A crowd gathers at the World War Two Memorial to support a rally centered around reopening national memorials closed by the government shutdown, supported by military veterans, Tea Party activists and Republicans, on October 13, 2013.
National Journal
Beth Reinhard
See more stories about...
Beth Reinhard
Dec. 11, 2013, midnight

Sev­en tea party chal­lengers are run­ning against Re­pub­lic­an in­cum­bents in next year’s Sen­ate primar­ies, and it’s en­tirely pos­sible that every last one of them will lose.

But it doesn’t really mat­ter: The tea party has already won.

Though the move­ment’s can­did­ates are un­der­dogs in most of the 2014 con­tests against the Re­pub­lic­an es­tab­lish­ment, the mere fear of con­ser­vat­ive chal­lengers has the grass­roots chalk­ing up vic­tory after vic­tory on Cap­it­ol Hill.

The tea party shut down the gov­ern­ment over Obama­care, put im­mig­ra­tion re­form on life sup­port, and is hold­ing the farm bill host­age over food stamps. Hard-liners long ago tor­pedoed hopes of a “grand bar­gain” over the budget and debt lim­it. And in a sign that budget com­prom­ise with Demo­crats con­tin­ues to be ver­boten, con­ser­vat­ive groups from Her­it­age Ac­tion to Freedom­Works were re­ject­ing a deal between Demo­crat­ic Sen. Patty Mur­ray and Re­pub­lic­an Rep. Paul Ry­an Tues­day — be­fore it was even an­nounced.

So even if Re­pub­lic­ans fa­cing primary chal­lengers from the right are not in real danger, their rivals will keep bring­ing the heat, scram­bling the po­ten­tial for deals by a Con­gress already mak­ing his­tory for do­ing so little.

“The tea party has racked up im­port­ant vic­tor­ies elect­or­ally but also ideo­lo­gic­ally, and that pres­sure on es­tab­lish­ment Re­pub­lic­ans will con­tin­ue,” said James Hart­man, a Louisi­ana-based polit­ic­al con­sult­ant ad­vising tea party-backed con­gres­sion­al can­did­ate Rob Maness. “The com­prom­ises be­ing blocked are ab­so­lutely fa­vor­able in terms of pub­lic policy. No, we don’t want tax in­creases. No, we don’t want Obama­care.”

The battle for the heart and soul of the Re­pub­lic­an Party ex­pan­ded in the past week to in­clude chal­lenges against Mis­sis­sippi Sen. Thad Co­chran and Texas Sen. John Cornyn, bring­ing the total of GOP sen­at­ors fa­cing primary op­pon­ents to sev­en. All of the in­cum­bents are favored to beat their op­pon­ents. But that doesn’t mean they’re free to cut any deals across the aisle; do­ing so would be risky in a highly po­lar­ized polit­ic­al cli­mate that sees com­prom­ise as be­tray­al.

“Mem­bers of Con­gress are risk averse, and if they can avoid get­ting at­ten­tion from the bul­lies, they will,” said Re­pub­lic­an con­sult­ant John Fee­hery, a former Cap­it­ol Hill staffer.

Former Min­nesota Sen. Norm Cole­man, chair­man of the board of the pro-im­mig­ra­tion re­form Amer­ica Ac­tion Net­work, says he doesn’t see any Re­pub­lic­an sen­at­ors in jeop­ardy. But he ac­know­ledged that what he called the “fringe of the tea party” will make it ex­tremely dif­fi­cult to reach agree­ments on a path­way to cit­izen­ship and oth­er is­sues.

“Ele­ments with­in the tea party are def­in­itely push­ing Re­pub­lic­ans to the right really hard and push­ing a pur­ist ap­proach,” he said. “If folks are say­ing ‘don’t com­prom­ise,’ that ob­vi­ously makes it harder to find com­mon ground.”

Some of the Re­pub­lic­an in­sur­gents, in­clud­ing House can­did­ate Bry­an Smith in Idaho and Sen­ate can­did­ates Chris McDaniel in Mis­sis­sippi and Matt Bev­in in Ken­tucky, were already call­ing on mem­bers to re­ject a budget deal to keep the gov­ern­ment open after Jan. 15 — be­fore the agree­ment was fi­nal­ized. Their ob­jec­tion is that it would elim­in­ate some of the spend­ing cuts that were man­dat­ory un­der the so-called se­quester.

“The Ry­an-Mur­ray deal is a com­plete ab­dic­a­tion of Wash­ing­ton’s gov­ern­ing re­spons­ib­il­ity,” said McDaniel, who an­nounced his chal­lenge to Co­chran last week. This kind of in­cen­di­ary rhet­or­ic makes it harder for mem­bers to reach even a short-term agree­ment.

Anti-tax cru­sader Grover Nor­quist called the se­quester “the great ac­com­plish­ment of the tea party move­ment” on Twit­ter ““ a sign, he said, that the tea party has suc­ceeded in chan­ging the cul­ture in Wash­ing­ton and bey­ond.

“Ear­marks were pre­vi­ously viewed as a sign of vir­il­ity and power,” he ad­ded in an email. “They are now viewed as akin to shoplift­ing. That cul­tur­al shift in the GOP caucus is en­dur­ing.”

While con­ser­vat­ive rivals will keep Re­pub­lic­an in­cum­bents on their heels, Bri­an Walsh, a former spokes­man for the Na­tion­al Re­pub­lic­an Sen­at­ori­al Com­mit­tee, said the primar­ies will ul­ti­mately strengthen the party.

“I think the les­son every­one drew the last two cycles is that Re­pub­lic­an in­cum­bents can’t take any­thing for gran­ted,” he said. “To the ex­tent that they win those primar­ies and fend off those at­tacks, the stronger the party will be in the fu­ture.”

What We're Following See More »
AND VICE VERSA
Plurality of Trump Voters Just Want to Stop Clinton
14 minutes ago
WHY WE CARE

"Nearly half of American voters who support either Democrat Hillary Clinton or Republican Donald Trump for the White House said they will mainly be trying to block the other side from winning, according to a Reuters/Ipsos poll released Thursday." When Trump supporters were asked to give their primary reason for supporting him, 47% said to block Clinton from winning. In almost a mirror image, 46% of Clinton supporters said they were primarily out to thwart Trump.

Source:
IF HE’LL JUST LISTEN…
Many GOPers Still Think Trump Can Be Brought to Heel
31 minutes ago
THE DETAILS
INCLUDING CLINTON
Trump Finance Guru Has History of Contributing to Dems
2 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

"Like Donald Trump himself, the Trump campaign’s new national finance chairman has a long history of contributing to Democrats—including Hillary Clinton. Private investor Steven Mnuchin, Trump’s new campaign fundraising guru, has contributed more than $120,000" to candidates since 1995, about half of which has gone to Democrats.

Source:
AT LEAST NOT YET
Paul Ryan Can’t Get Behind Trump
18 hours ago
THE LATEST

Paul Ryan told CNN today he's "not ready" to back Donald Trump at this time. "I'm not there right now," he said. Ryan said Trump needs to unify "all wings of the Republican Party and the conservative movement" and then run a campaign that will allow Americans to "have something that they're proud to support and proud to be a part of. And we've got a ways to go from here to there."

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trump Roadmapped His Candidacy in 2000
20 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The Daily Beast has unearthed a piece that Donald Trump wrote for Gear magazine in 2000, which anticipates his 2016 sales pitch quite well. "Perhaps it's time for a dealmaker who can get the leaders of Congress to the table, forge consensus, and strike compromise," he writes. Oddly, he opens by defending his reputation as a womanizer: "The hypocrites argue that a man who loves and appreciates beautiful women (and does so legally and openly) shouldn't become a national leader? Is there something wrong with appreciating beautiful women? Don't we want people in public office who show signs of life?"

Source:
×