Why is Rick Santorum Running a Movie Studio?

It might just be a savvy career move.

National Journal
Kevin Lincoln
June 18, 2014, 4 p.m.

At the be­gin­ning of 2013, Rick San­tor­um — former sen­at­or from Pennsylvania, 2012 Re­pub­lic­an pres­id­en­tial run­ner-up, likely 2016 can­did­ate — began help­ing to raise money for Echo­Light Stu­di­os, a Chris­ti­an film pro­duc­tion and dis­tri­bu­tion com­pany formerly based out of Dal­las and now loc­ated in Frank­lin, Ten­ness­ee. A few months later, he ac­cep­ted a spot on the board of the stu­dio. Then he be­came chair­man of the board. Even­tu­ally he voiced con­cerns about how Echo­Light was be­ing run. By June 2013, he was the com­pany’s CEO.

“Be care­ful what you com­plain about,” San­tor­um told me in May. When we spoke, he had just sent back notes on the eighth draft of a film script.

Try­ing to ex­plain San­tor­um’s ven­ture through the lens of polit­ic­al cal­cu­la­tion isn’t easy. If he runs again in 2016 — and most ob­serv­ers as­sume he will — he’ll need to some­how per­suade voters that he is more than just a hard-line cul­ture war­ri­or, an im­age that he says was nev­er ac­cur­ate in the first place. “The ca­ri­ca­ture of the per­son and the per­son tend nev­er to be quite the same,” he told me. “I have a long list of lead­er­ship on a vari­ety of is­sues where I had strong bi­par­tis­an sup­port. It’s easy for the me­dia to write a char­ac­ter­iz­a­tion about some­body, but I don’t know that it re­flects the to­tal­ity of the per­son or their work.”

(Richard Mia)

Helm­ing a Chris­ti­an movie stu­dio isn’t go­ing to do much to upend the ca­ri­ca­ture of San­tor­um. In that sense, it does seem like a strange move. And yet, as I learned more about his pro­ject, I star­ted to think it might not be such a bizarre way for Rick San­tor­um to be spend­ing his time. To un­der­stand why, it helps to re­move polit­ics from the equa­tion — and to take Echo­Light Stu­di­os ser­i­ously on its own terms.

ONCE A PUNCH LINE re­served for dir­ect-to-video and Sunday school, Chris­ti­an cinema has re­cently seen a re­mark­able amount of suc­cess. Ac­cord­ing to the in­dustry track­er Box Of­fice Mojo, the three highest-gross­ing Chris­ti­an films ever re­leased — ex­clud­ing the Chron­icles of Nar­nia films, which were more con­ven­tion­al block­busters, and Mel Gib­son’s Pas­sion of the Christ, a phe­nomen­on all its own — came out this year: Heav­en Is for Real, God’s Not Dead, and Son of God.

“This trend is not go­ing to stop any­time soon,” says Phil Con­trino, vice pres­id­ent and chief ana­lyst of Box­Of­fice.com. “Faith-based films are suc­ceed­ing be­cause they ap­peal to a seg­ment of the pop­u­la­tion that is of­ten ser­i­ously un­der­served by nor­mal Hol­ly­wood flicks.” It all makes a lot of eco­nom­ic sense: In the hy­per-spe­cif­ic me­dia land­scape of con­tem­por­ary Amer­ica, where every­one has a cable-news chan­nel, comedi­ans, web­sites, and mu­si­cians tailored for their polit­ic­al and aes­thet­ic tastes, movies shouldn’t be any dif­fer­ent.

While Heav­en Is for Real and Son of God were ma­jor-stu­dio products, God’s Not Dead provides the blue­print for what a stu­dio like San­tor­um’s Echo­Light could be cap­able of. Pro­duced by a Chris­ti­an film com­pany called Pure Flix, it had grossed 30 times its pro­duc­tion budget after about two months of re­lease. Its secret weapon was a savvy dis­tri­bu­tion strategy. Those in­volved in the film reached out dir­ectly to pas­tors and con­greg­a­tions — im­plor­ing the faith­ful to buy tick­ets in bunches, rent out movie theat­ers, and or­der DVD pack­ages they could show to Sunday-school classes and church groups.

{{third­PartyEmbed type:magazineAd source:magazine_mid}}

Echo­Light was foun­ded in 2011; be­fore the winter 2013 re­lease of The Christ­mas Candle, Echo­Light’s first movie with San­tor­um as CEO, it had been in­volved with 10 films to vary­ing de­grees, none of which re­ceived wide the­at­ric­al re­lease. The Christ­mas Candle grossed $2 mil­lion — cer­tainly not a wild suc­cess. But to gauge Echo­Light’s po­ten­tial, con­sider that, when San­tor­um took over the com­pany, it was sit­ting on a film­mak­ing fund of about $20 mil­lion. God’s Not Dead re­portedly cost $2 mil­lion to pro­duce. That means San­tor­um and Echo­Light could af­ford to make 10 such movies. If just one does as well as God’s Not Dead, the com­pany will be in great shape.

San­tor­um and Echo­Light Pres­id­ent Jeff Sheets are hop­ing to use con­greg­a­tions as a test­ing ground to premi­er their films, lit­er­ally turn­ing churches in­to theat­ers where they can gauge im­pact and en­thu­si­asm. “If they don’t res­on­ate well with the church, then it isn’t real­ist­ic to think that they’re go­ing to res­on­ate well in theat­ers,” says Sheets (who tells me that he works with San­tor­um “lit­er­ally daily”). If the films “do res­on­ate well in the church, and there’s a grow­ing groundswell of sup­port, then it will over­flow in­to the theat­ers and it will have a much broad­er im­pact on so­ci­ety.” It also means that a film has to prove it­self be­fore Echo­Light takes “the much more ex­pens­ive ap­proach of put­ting it in theat­ers.”

Some of those movies may be long shots to garner a mass audi­ence — but all of them are prob­ably surer bets than a pres­id­en­tial cam­paign.

It seems en­tirely pos­sible that San­tor­um’s fame could help to bring at­ten­tion to some of these movies; cer­tainly, the na­tion­al at­ten­tion The Christ­mas Candle re­ceived, both pos­it­ive and neg­at­ive, would nev­er have come without San­tor­um’s in­volve­ment. “I looked at it as, in the last elec­tion, I was giv­en a gift. Be­fore the elec­tion, a few people knew who I was, but after run­ning for pres­id­ent, you have a lot more name re­cog­ni­tion,” San­tor­um told me. “I think pro­mot­ing the im­port­ance of faith as an ele­ment of people’s lives and how it can im­pact people’s lives, telling true stor­ies and in­spir­a­tion­al stor­ies about that — it’s a pretty good way to shape the fu­ture. I felt like that was a good way to take the no­tori­ety that I have and turn it in­to something pos­it­ive.”

Des­pite its niche nature, Echo­Light seems de­term­ined to have some main­stream cred­ib­il­ity. Sheets told me about an up­com­ing doc­u­ment­ary the stu­dio is put­ting to­geth­er on the sec­u­lar­iz­a­tion of Amer­ic­an so­ci­ety, which went to great lengths to in­clude voices from the oth­er side — such as Amer­ic­ans United for Sep­ar­a­tion of Church and State Ex­ec­ut­ive Dir­ect­or Barry Lynn and Prin­ceton pro­fess­or Peter Sing­er. “We want to be able to rep­res­ent your voice well on screen,” Sheets says he told the lead­ers of the South­ern Poverty Law Cen­ter in a suc­cess­ful bid to get them to par­ti­cip­ate. “We’re not go­ing to ma­nip­u­late what you say. We’re not go­ing to edit it to make you look silly.”

{{third­PartyEmbed type:magazineAd source:magazine_bot­tom}}

SAN­TOR­UM’S TEN­URE AT Echo­Light has not been without tur­bu­lence: Three months after his el­ev­a­tion to CEO, Echo­Light fired the com­pany’s two cofounders. Moreover, ex­cept for The Christ­mas Candle, none of Echo­Light’s ma­jor San­tor­um-era pro­jects has been in a theat­er yet — so it re­mains to be seen wheth­er the com­pany can cre­ate hits out of such pro­jects as Find­ing Faith (“Be­fore mov­ing away forever, a de­term­ined young boy starts a kid-powered move­ment to spark last­ing change in his ho­met­own — but his BIGGEST chal­lenge is to bring his wid­owed fath­er back to faith — and to love”); a Korean War movie tent­at­ively titled War Shep­herd (“In a city rav­aged by war, an orphan boy meets his sa­vior, a mil­it­ary chap­lain who must find strength in his faith in or­der to save one thou­sand orphans from an im­pend­ing en­emy at­tack”); or, per­haps most prom­isingly, a movie based on the Left Be­hind books, a wildly pop­u­lar series of Chris­ti­an nov­els.

Some of those movies may be long shots to garner a mass audi­ence — but all of them are prob­ably surer bets than a pres­id­en­tial cam­paign. San­tor­um would nev­er say this, of course, but run­ning for pres­id­ent is al­ways go­ing to mean tough odds, for him or any­one else. In an era when the Chris­ti­an film in­dustry is com­ing in­to its own, run­ning Echo­Light Stu­di­os might be one of the sav­vi­er back-up plans any politi­cian has come up with in a long time. “I see the work that I’m do­ing at Echo­Light as a con­tinu­ation in try­ing to shape Amer­ica or ex­pose Amer­ica to val­ues that I think are im­port­ant for a strong and healthy coun­try,” San­tor­um told me when I asked how his new film ca­reer dove­tailed with his polit­ic­al ca­reer, in­clud­ing a pos­sible 2016 run. “I think cul­ture is up­stream from polit­ics, and maybe it’s im­port­ant to get in­volved in the up­stream and see what the im­pact can be to the coun­try gen­er­ally as a res­ult.”

Kev­in Lin­coln is a writer liv­ing in Los Angeles.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
35 minutes ago
NATIONAL JOURNAL AFTER DARK

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Source:
STATE VS. FEDERAL
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
35 minutes ago
WHY WE CARE

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
35 minutes ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
35 minutes ago
WHY WE CARE

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
1 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”

Source:
×