Why Obamacare’s Second Year Won’t Necessarily Be Easier

Changes in the landscape could eliminate some problems while creating others.

MIAMI, FL - MARCH 31: Gexon Orozco sits with his mother, Claudia Gonzalez (L) and grandmother Consuelo Salmeron (R) as he attempts to get a health care plan under the Affordable Care Act from an agent with the Sunshine Life and Health Advisors at a store setup in the Mall of Americas on March 31, 2014 in Miami, Florida. Today is the last day for the first yearly sign-up period and Sunshine Life and Health saw a wait of four hours or more for people to see a health insurance advisor.
Getty Images
Sam Baker
June 5, 2014, 5 p.m.

The White House hasn’t hit the far side of the Obama­care learn­ing curve yet.

After meet­ing its first-year en­roll­ment tar­gets prac­tic­ally in spite of it­self, the ad­min­is­tra­tion is look­ing at a year two in which suc­cess won’t simply be a mat­ter of rep­lic­at­ing year one. The Obama­care land­scape is already chan­ging in big and some­times un­ex­pec­ted ways, mak­ing the law’s next open-en­roll­ment peri­od — the second of three in­ten­ded to col­lect­ively ex­pand health care cov­er­age to some 26 mil­lion un­in­sured Amer­ic­ans — a dif­fer­ent kind of chal­lenge, but not ne­ces­sar­ily a less­er one.

For starters, the ad­min­is­tra­tion will have half as much time to meet its second-year tar­gets. The 2015 open-en­roll­ment peri­od, which has been delayed un­til after the Novem­ber midterms, is just three months long. This year’s was six months, and the ad­min­is­tra­tion needed every minute of it (plus a short ex­ten­sion).

To be sure, the first two months of the 2014 open-en­roll­ment peri­od were lost to the dis­aster that was Health­Care.gov, and, the­or­et­ic­ally, that won’t hap­pen again — which should help. (Al­though, the­or­et­ic­ally, it shouldn’t have happened the first time.)

“Hope­fully, one big dif­fer­ence the second time around will be a work­ing web­site from day one,” says Larry Levitt, seni­or vice pres­id­ent for spe­cial ini­ti­at­ives at the Kais­er Fam­ily Found­a­tion. “Long term, one would like to see im­prove­ments in the shop­ping pro­cess as well, though I’m not op­tim­ist­ic they have time to make many changes and test them for this next year.”

A couple of big changes to Health­Care.gov are already un­der­way, however, and those might boost en­roll­ment — or they might hinder it. The ad­min­is­tra­tion is in the pro­cess of re­pla­cing many of the site’s con­tract­ors, a move that of­fers a chance to ditch the deeply flawed sys­tem and its myri­ad tem­por­ary patches but also re­quires re­peat­ing the same pro­cess of con­struc­tion, in­teg­ra­tion, and test­ing that went so poorly last time.

In ad­di­tion, the site’s work­load is grow­ing. Thirty-six states re­lied on Health­Care.gov this year rather than on their own ex­changes, and that num­ber will in­crease for 2015. Ore­gon has already de­faul­ted to the fed­er­al web­site. So has Nevada, al­though it says the move is only tem­por­ary. Mas­sachu­setts is try­ing to fix its broken ex­change but has laid the ground­work to join Health­Care.gov if that doesn’t work. Oth­er states with faulty ex­changes, such as Hawaii, could fol­low. Bring­ing those states in­to the fed­er­al sys­tem could boost 2015 en­roll­ment slightly, be­cause many of their eli­gible res­id­ents who wer­en’t able to sign up this year will likely still want in­sur­ance. But that pre­sumes that the site, and the hu­mans be­hind it, will be able to keep up with the de­mand.

That will be the acid test, be­cause if there’s one clear les­son from the 2014 ex­per­i­ence, it’s that there’s plenty of de­mand for health in­sur­ance. More than 8 mil­lion people se­lec­ted a private plan through the ex­changes dur­ing the six-month open-en­roll­ment win­dow, al­most half of them in the fi­nal six weeks.

The biggest po­ten­tial threat to strong en­roll­ment in 2015 — big premi­um in­creases — doesn’t seem to be ma­ter­i­al­iz­ing, at least so far. Some in­surers and ana­lysts warned of massive cost spikes for 2015, which would not only make the ex­changes less at­tract­ive to new cus­tom­ers, but could also cause ex­ist­ing cus­tom­ers to drop out.

Only a hand­ful of states have re­leased their 2015 rates, but the in­creases so far are not nearly as big as crit­ics pre­dicted. And some in­surers even plan to cut their prices next year.

One factor keep­ing premi­um hikes in check: More in­sur­ance com­pan­ies are jump­ing in­to the ex­changes. “It’s clear from early re­ports that there will be more in­surers par­ti­cip­at­ing in the mar­ket­places, in­clud­ing in some areas where only one choice was avail­able this year. I haven’t yet heard of any in­surers drop­ping out,” Levitt said.

In par­tic­u­lar, ma­jor in­surers with big mar­ket­ing budgets are en­ter­ing the mar­ket­places or ex­pand­ing their pres­ence, of­ten com­ing in with low rates — which at­tract the health­i­est cus­tom­ers, which, in turn, forces com­pet­ing in­surers to keep their own premi­ums down. With a pool of po­ten­tial en­rollees that’s pre­sumed to be some­what health­i­er than this year’s, more in­surers are be­gin­ning to see the ex­changes as a good busi­ness op­por­tun­ity.

That’s one of the biggest changes in the Obama­care land­scape, and surely the one the White House is hap­pi­est about as it heads to­ward 2015.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
CITIZENS UNITED PT. 2?
Movie Based on ‘Clinton Cash’ to Debut at Cannes
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."

Source:
×