The Mississippi Gamble

The Republican Party of the South has changed under Thad Cochran’s feet.

UNITED STATES - MAY 30: Sen. Thad Cochran, R-Miss., is interviewed outside of Methodist Olive Branch Hospital, after a tour of the facility in Olive Branch, Miss., May 30, 2014. 
CQ-Roll Call,Inc.
Charlie Cook
June 5, 2014, 5 p.m.

Over the last few weeks, it has been hard to watch six-term Sen. Thad Co­chran fight for polit­ic­al sur­viv­al in Mis­sis­sippi’s Re­pub­lic­an primary without think­ing of some of the lyr­ics from Kenny Ro­gers’s song “The Gam­bler.” In the second stanza, we hear an old-timer say, “Son, I’ve made a life out of read­in’ people’s faces, know­in’ what the cards were by the way they held their eyes. So if you don’t mind me say­in,’ I can see you are out of aces. For a taste of your whis­key, I’ll give you some ad­vice.” The chor­us, as most people over a cer­tain age know, is: “You’ve got to know when to hold ‘em, know when to fold ‘em, know when to walk away, know when to run.”

This past Tues­day, Co­chran was forced in­to a primary run­off, sched­uled for June 24. With 99.8 per­cent of the vote coun­ted, Coch­ran stands at 49.0 per­cent, to 49.4 per­cent for his chal­lenger, law­yer and talk-show host Chris McDaniel. A third can­did­ate, former Re­altor Thomas Carey, re­ceived 1.5 per­cent of the vote. Al­though elec­tions in­volve hu­man be­ha­vi­or and opin­ions, which are fickle and sub­ject to change, Co­chran’s chances of pre­vail­ing in the run­off don’t look par­tic­u­larly good.

McDaniel’s chal­lenge was rap­idly gain­ing steam un­til three weeks ago, when it was dis­closed that tea-party act­iv­ists — who were sup­port­ive of McDaniel but who may or may not have been act­ing in con­cert with the chal­lenger’s cam­paign — slipped in­to a nurs­ing home and video­taped foot­age of Co­chran’s wife, who has been suf­fer­ing from de­men­tia for a long time.

However, as the primary neared, the harm to McDaniel’s cam­paign seemed to wear off, and his mo­mentum re­sumed. While the nurs­ing-home ker­fuffle may have been the break Co­chran needed, it came out too early to have a last­ing im­pact on primary day. And then, just as the nurs­ing-home video flap sub­sided, re­marks by Co­chran aboard his cam­paign bus to The Wash­ing­ton Post‘s Dan Balz cre­ated a head­ache for the Co­chran team. It also was a sign that the in­cum­bent’s abil­ity to stay on script and avoid mis­takes may not be what it once was.

Co­chran was asked about the Af­ford­able Care Act, which is wildly un­pop­u­lar among Mis­sis­sippi Re­pub­lic­ans. He re­spon­ded, “I think we need to mon­it­or any fed­er­al pro­grams that provide ser­vices and as­sist­ance to people who need help, and this is an ex­ample of an im­port­ant ef­fort by the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment to help make health care avail­able, ac­cess­ible, and af­ford­able.”

He con­tin­ued, “We have prob­ably one of the best health care sys­tems in the coun­try, in the world, and we’ll need to con­tin­ue to work to make sure it meets the ex­pect­a­tions and needs of the Amer­ic­an people. I’m glad to be in­volved in that ef­fort.”

The Co­chran cam­paign moved in­to dam­age-con­trol mode, sug­gest­ing that the sen­at­or thought the ques­tion was about vet­er­ans’ health care. But even giv­ing him every be­ne­fit of the doubt, mis­takes such as these can cost elec­tions. At the very least, in these later in­nings, Co­chran was lob­bing grapefruits, not fast­balls, across the plate. Former Mis­sis­sippi Gov. and Re­pub­lic­an Na­tion­al Com­mit­tee Chair­man Haley Bar­bour and his neph­ew Henry Bar­bour were try­ing everything to get Co­chran in­to the next in­ning. However, even with the best of their ef­forts, it just wasn’t enough.

The na­tion­al GOP es­tab­lish­ment is torn between un­der­stand­able loy­alty to Co­chran and aver­sion to McDaniel on the one hand, and a prag­mat­ic read­ing that throw­ing good money after bad makes little sense when this money will be needed in the gen­er­al elec­tion against Demo­crats. Bar­ring dis­clos­ure of some per­son­al pec­ca­dillos on McDaniel’s part, he is go­ing to be the GOP stand­ard-bear­er in Novem­ber. What kind of shape he emerges in after the primary dust has settled will de­term­ine wheth­er former Rep. Trav­is Childers, the Demo­crat­ic nom­in­ee, has a chance to pick off the seat, or if GOP money will be needed more in oth­er states.

Los­ing would be a sad end for a proud man with a dis­tin­guished re­cord of ser­vice to his state and the coun­try and to the is­sues that Co­chran has cared so much about. To me, he was part of a trans­ition­al gen­er­a­tion of sen­at­ors who came just after or to­ward the end of the era of the old South­ern bulls — men like Al­len El­lender and Rus­sell Long from Louisi­ana; J. Wil­li­am Ful­bright and John Mc­Cle­l­lan from Arkan­sas; Richard Rus­sell and Her­man Tal­madge from Geor­gia; John Spark­man and James Al­len from Alabama; Strom Thur­mond and Fritz Hollings from South Car­o­lina; and Sam Ervin and Ever­ett Jordan from North Car­o­lina.

After six years in the House and nearly 36 in the Sen­ate, it was time for Co­chran to fold ‘em. It wasn’t so much be­cause of age — plenty of 76-year-olds have con­tin­ued to serve ef­fect­ively in Con­gress. The second rap on Co­chran — that “he’s been in Wash­ing­ton too long” — gets a little closer to the mark. It’s not so much that he has lit­er­ally been serving in Con­gress too long but that the Re­pub­lic­an Party, par­tic­u­larly in the South, has changed un­der his feet, and he seemed largely un­aware of and ill-equipped to deal with that change.

Co­chran and oth­er South­ern Re­pub­lic­ans of a cer­tain age and time were cer­tainly con­ser­vat­ive, but they didn’t carry the scars of vari­ous civil- and vot­ing-rights Sen­ate battles. They were con­ser­vat­ive without the harder edge and more acerbic rhet­or­ic that many con­ser­vat­ives and Re­pub­lic­ans today prefer, par­tic­u­larly those in the South, in small towns and rur­al areas as well as the ex­urbs. These politi­cians don’t just prefer red meat. They go for very rare or (bet­ter still) raw meat — something that’s pretty ali­en to a more gen­teel gen­er­a­tion of South­ern Re­pub­lic­ans.

Cor­rec­tion: An earli­er ver­sion of this column mis­stated the num­ber of terms Sen. Co­chran has served in the Sen­ate.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
35 minutes ago
NATIONAL JOURNAL AFTER DARK

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Source:
STATE VS. FEDERAL
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
35 minutes ago
WHY WE CARE

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
35 minutes ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
35 minutes ago
WHY WE CARE

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
1 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”

Source:
×