How Democrats Running for Governor Will Talk About Obamacare

The law is still unpopular, but Democratic gubernatorial candidates have found a silver lining in it.

Audrey Haynes, left, secretary of Health and Family Services, unveils the total number of enrollees in Kynect as Gov. Steve Beshear looks on during a news conference at the Capitol in Frankfort, Ky., on April 22, 2014. 
LEXINGTON HERALD-LEADER2014
Karyn Bruggeman
May 6, 2014, 1 a.m.

Demo­crats run­ning for the Sen­ate aren’t talk­ing about the pres­id­ent’s health care law, out­side of oc­ca­sion­ally call­ing for a fix. But in sev­er­al pivotal gubernat­ori­al races, the party’s can­did­ates have shown they’re much more com­fort­able em­bra­cing Obama­care.

The phe­nomen­on is no ac­ci­dent. The bulk of this year’s com­pet­it­ive ex­ec­ut­ive con­tests are in Demo­crat­ic-lean­ing states car­ried by the pres­id­ent in 2012, where the law is less tox­ic than in the red states that dom­in­ate the Sen­ate elect­or­al land­scape.

Plus, state of­fi­cials, such as Ken­tucky Gov. Steve Be­s­hear, aren’t strug­gling like their fed­er­al coun­ter­parts to square a con­gres­sion­al vote with sour pub­lic opin­ion. “The prob­lem for the Re­pub­lic­an gov­ernors is, this elec­tion may fo­cus in con­gres­sion­al races on wheth­er you voted for it or wheth­er you didn’t, but folks know Demo­crat­ic gov­ernors and Re­pub­lic­an gov­ernors didn’t vote for it, be­cause they wer­en’t there. We had the job of im­ple­ment­ing it,” says Demo­crat­ic Gov­ernors As­so­ci­ation Chair­man Peter Shum­lin of Ver­mont.

In this year’s gubernat­ori­al con­tests, the main Obama­care is­sue is Medi­caid ex­pan­sion, the only part of the Af­ford­able Care Act that con­sist­ently polls well across the coun­try and also rests sin­gu­larly in the hands of the na­tion’s gov­ernors. In at least half a dozen races from Wis­con­sin to Geor­gia, Demo­crats plan to at­tack Re­pub­lic­an in­cum­bents for not ex­pand­ing Medi­caid — and they be­lieve it’s one of their top is­sues: An es­tim­ated 4.8 mil­lion people fall with­in the Medi­caid eli­gib­il­ity gap be­cause they don’t live in states where they’ve been af­forded the abil­ity to en­roll.

These op­por­tun­it­ies have opened small win­dows for Demo­crats to cam­paign on the law’s pos­it­ives, but it’s a strategy that so far has mostly been ad­op­ted by sev­er­al Demo­crat­ic un­der­dogs look­ing to catch late mo­mentum in con­tested primar­ies. Rep. Allyson Schwartz began the year as an early fa­vor­ite to face em­battled GOP Gov. Tom Corbett in Pennsylvania, but she now finds her­self strug­gling to run com­pet­it­ively against wealthy Demo­crat­ic rival Tom Wolf. Schwartz launched an ad in mid-April poin­tedly de­fend­ing her work on the Af­ford­able Care Act and has since called on her primary op­pon­ents to stop shy­ing away from the is­sue. “All the oth­er Demo­crats should speak up and talk about their pride in this law,” Schwartz said.

The ad flashes im­ages of her stand­ing be­side Pres­id­ent Obama be­fore Schwartz pro­claims dir­ect-to-cam­era, “It’s something I’m proud of,” and pro­ceeds to call out Corbett for his de­cision not to take fed­er­al money to ex­pand Medi­caid. She notes that 500,000 Pennsylvani­ans are miss­ing out on health cov­er­age be­cause of that de­cision.

In Flor­ida, Re­pub­lic­an-turned-Demo­crat Charlie Crist has de­fen­ded his sup­port for the law even though he’s been reg­u­larly at­tacked by Gov. Rick Scott for his po­s­i­tion. His strategy ap­pears to be geared to­ward win­ning over lib­er­al skep­tics, but it non­ethe­less sets him a world apart from most Demo­crats. The Sun-Sen­tinel in Fort Laud­er­dalere­por­ted in April that Crist said dur­ing a cam­paign stop, “I don’t shy away from it. I don’t back away from it. I don’t apo­lo­gize for it. It’s the right thing to do.”

But in some places, prob­lems with state-level in­sur­ance ex­changes have caused gubernat­ori­al can­did­ates as much heart­burn as op­por­tun­ity. In Mary­land, state At­tor­ney Gen­er­al Doug Gansler is fa­cing tough odds against front-run­ner An­thony Brown, the lieu­ten­ant gov­ernor, in the race to suc­ceed out­go­ing Gov. Mar­tin O’Mal­ley. The state is one of sev­er­al where ex­change web­sites have suffered ser­i­ous prob­lems; the Mary­land site’s launch and sub­sequent re­pair pro­cess looks like it might cost an ad­di­tion­al $40 mil­lion on top of the $130 mil­lion already spent to switch to Con­necti­c­ut’s sys­tem. Though Brown was not per­son­ally re­spons­ible for the web­site, he was the one O’Mal­ley chose to guide im­ple­ment­a­tion of fed­er­al health re­form. Gansler has been us­ing the is­sue to ag­gress­ively ques­tion Brown’s lead­er­ship abil­ity, call­ing the web­site a “mess” and “a $200 mil­lion fail­ure” in a series of cam­paign ads.

Gansler co­chaired Obama’s cam­paign in Mary­land in 2008 and led Demo­crat­ic at­tor­neys gen­er­al in fil­ing an amicus brief in sup­port of the law with the Su­preme Court.

“The thing we’re hear­ing from voters is that Mary­land’s health ex­change should have led the na­tion, but in­stead it’s failed, and it’s been an em­bar­rass­ment, and it hurt people. That’s why An­thony Brown’s fail­ure is so egre­gious,” said Gansler spokes­wo­man Katie Hill. “We can do bet­ter and should have done bet­ter.”

The botched Cov­er Ore­gon statewide health care ex­change — which The Wash­ing­ton Post labeled the “worst Obama­care web­site” — is also emer­ging as a ma­jor is­sue in Gov. John Kitzhaber’s reelec­tion cam­paign. Last Fri­day, the Cov­er Ore­gon­board de­cided to join the fed­er­al Health­Care.gov ex­change in the wake of per­sist­ent tech­nic­al prob­lems. State Rep. Den­nis Richard­son ap­pears likely to win the Re­pub­lic­an primary and face Kitzhaber in Novem­ber, and he plans to make the ex­change the cent­ral fo­cus of his cam­paign. In a re­cent in­ter­view with the As­so­ci­ated Press, Richard­son called it “an in­dic­a­tion of the fail­ure of lead­er­ship of our gov­ernor.” 

Asked wheth­er more can­did­ates would be en­dors­ing Obama­care as part of their cam­paign mes­saging, Shum­lin de­clined to com­ment. In­stead, he said he ex­pec­ted that many GOP gov­ernors’ op­pos­i­tion to Medi­caid ex­pan­sion would be­come an is­sue in the gen­er­al elec­tion. “I would ar­gue that on health care, those that will be pun­ished in gov­ernor’s races are those that re­fuse to give ac­cess to their most vul­ner­able be­cause they’re try­ing to make a polit­ic­al point.”

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Maher Weighs in on Bernie, Trump and Palin
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

“We haven’t seen a true leftist since FDR, so many millions are coming out of the woodwork to vote for Bernie Sanders; he is the Occupy movement now come to life in the political arena.” So says Bill Maher in his Hollywood Reporter cover story (more a stream-of-consciousness riff than an essay, actually). Conservative states may never vote for a socialist in the general election, but “this stuff has never been on the table, and these voters have never been activated.” Maher saves most of his bile for Donald Trump and Sarah Palin, writing that by nominating Palin as vice president “John McCain is the one who opened the Book of the Dead and let the monsters out.” And Trump is picking up where Palin left off.

Source:
×