Immigration reform was once a real thing on Capitol Hill. Lawmakers huddled in secret; political risks were calculated and taken; tentative deals were struck. But now, despite some suggestions from Sen. Chuck Schumer about a lame-duck legislative fix, there’s really no chance of an overhaul of the dreadful U.S. immigration system. The groups lobbying for reform have failed to gain traction with their strategy of shaming Republicans into action, leaving advocates confused and conflicted about where to go next.
Indeed, many say that at this point, they don’t even know what they’re fighting for. Very few will say it on the record, but Arnoldo Torres will. “I don’t know what all of this is about anymore,” says the former executive director of the League of United Latin American Citizens who played a major role in the 1986 immigration law that offered amnesty to 3 million unauthorized immigrants. “I don’t think our side knows what it wants to do anymore.”
Ask the question, and you’ll understand what Torres means. Some reform advocates talk about pushing for piecemeal legislative fixes — a series of bills that would address citizenship for undocumented youth, legalization for other unauthorized immigrants, and more visas for high-skilled foreigners, for example. Others, especially those based outside of Washington, think the most effective move is to pressure the White House for an executive order that would provide immediate deportation relief to a bigger pool of undocumented immigrants than the “Dreamers” who were brought into the country illegally as children.
Count Arturo Carmona, executive director of the left-leaning Presente.org, among the latter group. He has given up on a new law and is now focusing solely on President Obama. Carmona says many reform advocates have become tainted by an inside-Washington thought process that feeds the fruitless hope that dynamics in Congress will suddenly shift.
Presente.org and other supporters of executive action bet that if Obama expands his deferred-deportation program to a broader population, Republicans won’t dare stand in the way. They see this strategy as a bold, in-your-face idea, but it’s not one that all advocates back.
Those who still want to curry favor with pro-immigration Republicans say Obama shouldn’t intentionally irritate the GOP with yet another controversial administrative action. And still others who are eager to keep the White House listening to them say that pressuring Obama to act on his own is akin to fouling one’s own nest, when the president’s opponents in Congress are in fact the ones at fault.
Most immigration-reform groups are somewhere in the middle, in effect acknowledging that nothing they do will result in either a big immigration bill this year or dramatic executive action. What’s most likely to happen is that Obama will offer some type of deportation fix at the end of the summer, but not enough of one to be called massive relief for the people here illegally. That would leave those in the advocacy community in more or less the same place they are now, unsatisfied and wondering what to ask for next.
“We’re fully focused on pressuring Obama to expand deferred action, but we don’t expect it to be very much,” concedes Mario Carrillo, spokesman for United We Dream, an organization of immigrant youth seeking administrative action. “When that happens, we’ll make sure our views are heard that it will not be enough.”
For the next Congress, the advocacy strategy, such as it is, will depend almost entirely on the results of the midterms. If Latino voters can show they can swing at least a few elections, as they did in 2014, they will have made a powerful statement to any politician seeking the White House: Be willing to fix immigration, or we walk. That message will resonate the most with GOP presidential candidates, who will need Hispanic support if they expect to win a general election. But it couldn’t hurt to pressure the Democratic candidates, either.
The problems with relying on the midterms are twofold, as advocates readily admit. First, getting Latino voters to the polls this November will not be as easy as it was in the last presidential election. Second, even if Latino voters make waves in 2014, they probably will not hand lawmakers a road map to follow.
The lack of a clear and unified approach weakens the reform movement. Individual players will probably struggle for a while as the overall game plan shifts from what was solely a legislative strategy to one that is, by necessity, a multipronged campaign to leverage pressure from the White House to Congress and back. It makes for high-stakes maneuvering that no one entirely understands or can control. The only real certainty is that the issue won’t go away.
In the meantime, those who want immigration reform continue their protests, something Torres disdains. Protests communicate just one thing, he says: “Anger, anger, anger, anger.” Anger, he adds, is not a policy solution.
What We're Following See More »
Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.
Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”
Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."
In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-expected primary battle behind her, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton (D) is no longer going on the air in upcoming primary states. “Team Clinton hasn’t spent a single cent in … California, Indiana, Kentucky, Oregon and West Virginia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “campaign has spent a little more than $1 million in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone backer in the Senate, said the candidate should end his presidential campaign if he’s losing to Hillary Clinton after the primary season concludes in June, breaking sharply with the candidate who is vowing to take his insurgent bid to the party convention in Philadelphia.”