Why You’re Already Tired of 2014

Senators fighting for their lives are already in midsummer form — but can they keep up the pace?

National Journal
Scott Bland
See more stories about...
Scott Bland
April 10, 2014, 5 p.m.

Just as Christ­mas ad­vert­ising has spilled in­to the pre-Thanks­giv­ing peri­od, Hal­loween dis­plays creep in­to stores by Au­gust, and East­er candy hits shelves be­fore Valentine’s Day chocol­ates get some time to them­selves, the folks who sell polit­ic­al can­did­ates are push­ing their products earli­er than ever.

Already, red-state view­ers have seen a sig­ni­fic­ant num­ber of TV ads from en­dangered Demo­crat­ic Sens. Mark Pry­or, Mark Be­gich, and Mary Landrieu, none of whom have primary chal­lenges on the ho­ri­zon. Demo­crat­ic Rep. Gary Peters, run­ning for the Sen­ate in Michigan, star­ted at the end of March. Michelle Nunn, the pre­sumptive Demo­crat­ic nom­in­ee for Geor­gia’s open Sen­ate seat, just joined them on the air­waves. “Com­pared to 2010, it is very early for can­did­ates to be on the air to such a de­gree by this point,” said Eliza­beth Wil­ner, the seni­or vice pres­id­ent of Kantar Me­dia Ad In­tel­li­gence.

Sen­ate Minor­ity Lead­er Mitch Mc­Con­nell beat them all off the start­ing line early last year, be­fore he had an op­pon­ent from either party. Faced with low pop­ular­ity rat­ings and need­ling from Demo­crat­ic agit­at­ors, but blessed with abund­ant cash re­serves, the Ken­tucki­an’s reelec­tion cam­paign star­ted air­ing TV ads in March 2013, more than a year be­fore the Re­pub­lic­an primary and 601 days be­fore Elec­tion Day. Some fea­tured Mc­Con­nell’s wife, former Labor Sec­ret­ary Elaine Chao, speak­ing of his love for his state, while oth­ers in­toned against Mc­Con­nell’s favored ad­versary, Pres­id­ent Obama.

The ex­plo­sion of spend­ing by polit­ic­al non­profits, su­per PACs, and oth­er out­side groups in re­cent elec­tions reached ca­co­phon­ous levels by the fi­nal weeks, leav­ing some strategists think­ing they would be bet­ter off put­ting some of that money to use at earli­er, non­tra­di­tion­al points on the cal­en­dar. As a res­ult, out­side polit­ic­al ad­vert­ising in 2013 and early 2014 was more in­tense than ever, led by the con­ser­vat­ive non­profit Amer­ic­ans for Prosper­ity’s mil­lions. AFP’s ad binge, in par­tic­u­lar, forced Demo­crat­ic cam­paigns to make an early judg­ment that there was no point in con­serving re­sources the tra­di­tion­al way.

“A few cycles ago, some im­port­ant people in Wash­ing­ton real­ized that a lot of these races were over by the time Demo­crats put their first ad up,” said Ben Chao, a Demo­crat­ic ad-maker. “Voters are pay­ing at­ten­tion much earli­er than ever, and, more im­port­antly, they’re mak­ing up their minds much earli­er.”

That was the situ­ation Pry­or’s cam­paign faced in Arkan­sas when he was the un­lucky tar­get of the first at­tack ads of 2014 — in Feb­ru­ary 2013. The Club for Growth and the Sen­ate Con­ser­vat­ives Fund dir­ec­ted more than $500,000 worth of TV and dir­ect-mail at­tacks at Pry­or in the winter and spring. With the un­answered at­tacks start­ing to bruise, Pry­or’s cam­paign joined his foes on TV with ads tout­ing his mod­er­ate and pop­u­list bona fides, along with some hit­ting his less­er-known fu­ture Re­pub­lic­an op­pon­ent, fresh­man Rep. Tom Cot­ton.

Pry­or still faces a deathly dif­fi­cult au­tumn race in a state Mitt Rom­ney car­ried by 23 per­cent­age points in 2012. But he hasn’t lost yet, something that looked like a real pos­sib­il­ity to people watch­ing the race in its early days. As The Cook Polit­ic­al Re­port wrote in March, “Ru­mors of his de­mise might be pre­ma­ture.”

“We feel our early ads and ef­forts to edu­cate folks about Con­gress­man Cot­ton’s re­cord went a long way to­ward mak­ing sure this race con­tin­ues to be com­pet­it­ive,” a Pry­or spokes­man said.

But en­ga­ging in ad­vert­ising to in­flu­ence that de­cision-mak­ing is ex­pens­ive, and the costs are more dif­fi­cult for cam­paigns to re­coup than they are for out­side groups that can raise a mil­lion dol­lars with a single check. As third parties such as Amer­ic­ans for Prosper­ity spend to spread their mes­sage, they have also squeezed their op­pon­ents fin­an­cially. In com­ments to donors and the press, Sen­ate Demo­crats have clamored for more money as the out­side spend­ing against them climbed.

“Amer­ic­ans for Prosper­ity has been very crafty,” Wil­ner said. “They’re for­cing a num­ber of Demo­crat­ic in­cum­bents on the air be­fore they want to. Money is not an is­sue for AFP, but for every in­cum­bent they force on the air, it is an is­sue.”

Sen­ate Demo­crats’ hefty cam­paign ac­counts should be a source of strength. But the glut of early ad­vert­ising — and the rest of the quick-start cam­paign­ing that those TV ads rep­res­ent — has pro­duced some drag on that front. Be­gich’s April fun­drais­ing dis­clos­ure re­vealed that he had already spent all the money he raised in the first three months of 2014. The $3 mil­lion Pry­or’s cam­paign had already spent by the end of 2013 al­lowed his op­pon­ent to pull closer to him, in fin­an­cial terms, than most oth­er Re­pub­lic­an chal­lengers at this stage.

That’s why can­did­ate ad­vert­ising has been mostly tar­geted at this early stage, rather than un­leashed at sat­ur­a­tion levels. Pry­or’s cam­paign points out that after its early ad­vert­ising spree in the middle of last year, the in­cum­bent has largely stayed off the air­waves. His strategists felt com­fort­able that the ba­sic mes­sage they had already in­tro­duced on TV was still res­on­at­ing with voters, even as his out­side-group ant­ag­on­ists re­mained act­ive. Demo­crats point to Arkan­sas as evid­ence that they’ve been able to keep up — barely — in this earli­er-than-ever bid for voters’ ap­prov­al.

“Busi­nesses need to cater to their cus­tom­ers,” Chao said. “We need to cater to the way voters are mak­ing their de­cisions.”

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Maher Weighs in on Bernie, Trump and Palin
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

“We haven’t seen a true leftist since FDR, so many millions are coming out of the woodwork to vote for Bernie Sanders; he is the Occupy movement now come to life in the political arena.” So says Bill Maher in his Hollywood Reporter cover story (more a stream-of-consciousness riff than an essay, actually). Conservative states may never vote for a socialist in the general election, but “this stuff has never been on the table, and these voters have never been activated.” Maher saves most of his bile for Donald Trump and Sarah Palin, writing that by nominating Palin as vice president “John McCain is the one who opened the Book of the Dead and let the monsters out.” And Trump is picking up where Palin left off.

Source:
×