This time, it’s for real. Economists say 2014 could bring the comeback we’ve all been waiting for.
They also said this in 2013. And 2012. And 2011. Those times, bullish sentiment succumbed to aggravated disappointment and a concession that, yes, the dismal scientists were wrong again. Now, though, some evidence actually backs them up, starting with across-the-board strengthening in the data and a better-than-before potential for Congress to avoid fiscal shenanigans for an entire year. An entire year!
Signs of a turnaround started to appear at the end of 2013. The November jobs report was solid and stronger than expected — unemployment dropped to 7 percent, down from a crisis peak of 10 percent, and payrolls swelled by 203,000. Then came GDP, which pegged third-quarter growth at a surprisingly respectable 4.1 percent. It was far better than the 2.5 percent growth in gross domestic product that the economy recorded in the second quarter. The Federal Reserve Board felt so good about the incoming data that it told Wall Street the central bank would begin taking its foot off the gas, easing back on stimulus measures.
A word, before we proceed, about the December jobs report, which the Bureau of Labor Statistics released Friday morning: It’s a head-scratcher. On one hand, the unemployment rate dropped to 6.7 percent, the lowest level since October 2008. On the other, payroll growth — for which there is a margin of error of plus-or-minus 100,000 — was much lower than expected, the economy adding just 74,000 jobs, compared with forecasts of roughly 200,000. More people left the labor force, and that’s part of the reason the unemployment rate, which is measured based on people looking for work, declined. But the previous two months’ payroll numbers were revised up by 38,000. The report was not a heartening way to start 2014, but it’s not quite clear yet what it means. Paul Ashworth, chief U.S. economist at Capital Economics, wrote in an emailed note to clients that the payroll miss was probably largely due to “unseasonably severe winter weather” last month. Joe LaVorgna, the chief U.S. economist at Deutsche Bank, called the news “bizarre.”
“It is such a inconsistent report in the sense that you’ve got the drop in the unemployment rate along with a weaker employment number,” he said. “The two almost offset each other.”
And despite one bad report, the fiscal news from December was good and offers hope for the rest of the year. Lawmakers passed a two-year budget deal, small though it was, that marked a significant departure from the let’s-make-decisions-only-after-freaking-everyone-out approach Congress has deployed relentlessly since the debt-ceiling debacle of 2011. Then, the brinkmanship drove markets and confidence off a cliff and stripped America of its gold-plated credit rating. In 2013, the fiscal cliff and sequester did enough damage to slice 1.5 percentage points off GDP growth, and the October government shutdown may have knocked half a percentage point from the fourth-quarter’s growth. (Those initially bullish economists blamed all of this stuff for their erroneous recovery predictions.)
In 2014, however, economists are calculating that stability in the data and a campaign-focused, risk-averse Congress will yield the sustained recovery the country’s been so-far denied. “That initial phase after [the] financial crisis is reparation, and then we can start recovery,” says Morgan Stanley economist Ellen Zentner. “I think that five years after the financial crisis, that’s where we are” — starting a “real” recovery.
Of course, all positive economic vibes come with caveats about unforeseen circumstances such as European sovereign-debt crises, Arab Springs, and tsunamis. And don’t forget about the debt ceiling, which lawmakers will have to grapple with eventually in 2014.
But the real potential for bad news lies in what we already know: Despite slow improvement in the economy and a possibility the recovery will proceed at a faster clip in the next 12 months, the nation has a long way to go before things are normal again, particularly for the long-term unemployed and others. Labor-force participation rates have continued their decline in recent months, as well.
The belief in the reality of recovery doesn’t just matter as a thought exercise. “If people don’t feel very good about their future finances, they tend not to spend,” Zentner says. “Consumer spending has been subpar, and that’s why the entire recovery has been subpar.” Measures of consumer sentiment were up in December — a good sign, but one that will need to be maintained.
How policymakers understand and talk about the recovery, then, matters. (See Jim Oliphant on “Why Obama Is Afraid to Tout the Economy”.) Describing it as real and strengthening could inspire confidence in consumers, an undeniably good thing. But it could also remove the impetus for taking further actions to shore up the recovery or help those affected by the financial crisis. Chad Stone, the chief economist at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, worries that a better-than-expected 2014 — while a good thing — might take pressure off economic policymakers, who he believes can do more to help workers get back on their feet by extending federal jobless benefits.
“We can be complacent about the direction the economy is going if growth picks up and employment picks up in 2014, but we have to, as I guess the British say, ‘mind the gap’ — that there still is this gap between what we would be capable of producing with stronger demand,” Stone says.
Hopes are already high for this month’s economic reports: Early signs point to GDP busting past expectations again for the fourth quarter. That, plus the jobs reports, will offer an early read on whether economists are right this time around or whether 2014 proves to be just another year of missed expectations. Initial signals are pointing to the former, and that’s good news for everyone.
What We're Following See More »
Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.
Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”
Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."
In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-expected primary battle behind her, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton (D) is no longer going on the air in upcoming primary states. “Team Clinton hasn’t spent a single cent in … California, Indiana, Kentucky, Oregon and West Virginia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “campaign has spent a little more than $1 million in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone backer in the Senate, said the candidate should end his presidential campaign if he’s losing to Hillary Clinton after the primary season concludes in June, breaking sharply with the candidate who is vowing to take his insurgent bid to the party convention in Philadelphia.”