SPOTLIGHT

Obamacare’s Improving Health

Rep. Allyson Schwartz, D-Pa.
National Journal
Scott Bland
See more stories about...
Scott Bland
April 23, 2014, 7:40 a.m.

It’s a con­fused time for Obama­care: As its poll num­bers bounce up and down in Gal­lup’s re­cent meas­ure­ments, the sig­nals com­ing from Demo­crat­ic cam­paigns also paint a con­tra­dict­ory pic­ture.

— Pennsylvania gubernat­ori­al can­did­ate Allyson Schwartz‘s (D) new TV ad tout­ing her work on Obama­care has at­trac­ted sig­ni­fic­ant at­ten­tion. It fol­lows an­oth­er not­able move in health care polit­ics, when the main out­side group back­ing Sen. Mark Be­gich (D) aired a testi­mo­ni­al ad tout­ing the law’s in­sur­ance re­forms on preex­ist­ing con­di­tions.

— Yet not every Demo­crat or Demo­crat­ic cam­paign is march­ing in the same dir­ec­tion in its mes­saging. Sen. Kay Hagan‘s (D) first flight of ra­dio ad­vert­ising in­cluded cri­ti­cism of North Car­o­lina state House Speak­er Thom Tillis (R) for once call­ing health care re­form “a great idea” (be­fore say­ing it couldn’t be paid for). Mean­while, Sen. Mary Landrieu (D), also in a tough red state race, pledged to the Wash­ing­ton Post this week that she’ll be on of­fense on health care, re­gard­ing Medi­caid ex­pan­sion and oth­er ac­cess is­sues.

— Obama­care’s healthy en­roll­ment num­bers and oth­er re­cent suc­cesses in cer­tain states, after a rocky start at im­ple­ment­a­tion, may even­tu­ally force Re­pub­lic­ans to change their strategy of at­tack­ing the law. (Demo­crats ar­gue res­ults in 2012 and oth­er elec­tions show it’s already cost­ing them.)

But for now. it’s Demo­crats who are go­ing with dif­fer­ent mes­sages in­dif­fer­ent situ­ations, from Demo­crat­ic primar­ies to tough gen­er­al elec­tion match­ups. Obama­care isn’t a com­pletely stable fix­ture of the polit­ic­al land­scape; opin­ions on it con­tin­ue to evolve. So, too, will the mes­saging we see.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Maher Weighs in on Bernie, Trump and Palin
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

“We haven’t seen a true leftist since FDR, so many millions are coming out of the woodwork to vote for Bernie Sanders; he is the Occupy movement now come to life in the political arena.” So says Bill Maher in his Hollywood Reporter cover story (more a stream-of-consciousness riff than an essay, actually). Conservative states may never vote for a socialist in the general election, but “this stuff has never been on the table, and these voters have never been activated.” Maher saves most of his bile for Donald Trump and Sarah Palin, writing that by nominating Palin as vice president “John McCain is the one who opened the Book of the Dead and let the monsters out.” And Trump is picking up where Palin left off.

Source:
×