Pro-Begich Ad Embraces Obamacare

Most of the Alaska Democrats’ colleagues have focused instead on fixing the law.

WASHINGTON, DC - OCTOBER 09: U.S. Sen. Mark Begich (D-AK) (R) speaks at a press conference highlighting how veterans are being impacted by the government shutdown with (L-R) Sen. Jon Tester (D-MT) and Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) at the U.S. Capitol October 9, 2013 in Washington, DC. During the event, Tester and others discussed how critical veterans services are being affected by the shutdown. 
National Journal
Andrea Drusch
See more stories about...
Andrea Drusch
April 10, 2014, 12:44 p.m.

A new TV ad from a su­per PAC that backs Demo­crat­ic Sen. Mark Be­gich is tak­ing an un­usu­al ap­proach to­ward Obama­care — it’s em­bra­cing it.

While fel­low vul­ner­able Demo­crats up for reelec­tion in 2014 high­light their at­tempts to re­move un­pop­u­lar por­tions of the law, a 30-second spot from the pro-Be­gich group Put Alaska First takes a page from the ad­min­is­tra­tion’s play­book and touts an in­di­vidu­al suc­cess story.

The ad fea­tures An­chor­age res­id­ent and breast can­cer sur­viv­or Lisa Keller thank­ing Be­gich for tak­ing on in­sur­ance com­pan­ies and help­ing her re­ceive treat­ment des­pite her preex­ist­ing con­di­tion.

“I was lucky. I beat can­cer. But the in­sur­ance com­pan­ies still denied me health in­sur­ance just be­cause of a preex­ist­ing con­di­tion,” Keller says in the ad. “I now have health in­sur­ance again be­cause of Mark Be­gich. Be­cause he fought the in­sur­ance com­pan­ies, so that we no longer have to.”

{{third­PartyEmbed type:you­tube id:YuoXvQD­C6oU}}

Re­pub­lic­ans have mocked the ad­vice of some top Demo­crats, like Demo­crat­ic Na­tion­al Com­mit­tee Chair­wo­man Debbie Wasser­man Schultz, that their party should run on Obama­care. In Novem­ber, Wasser­man Schultz said, “Demo­crat­ic can­did­ates will be able to run on Obama­care as an ad­vant­age lead­ing in­to the 2014 elec­tion.”

So far, few in­cum­bent Demo­crats are tak­ing her up on that.

In New Hamp­shire, Sen. Jeanne Shaheen has touted her calls for the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion to delay cov­er­age fines in light of prob­lems with the plan’s web­site, Health­Care.gov. In Louisi­ana, Sen. Mary Landrieu has run TV ads of her own telling voters she suc­cess­fully fought the pres­id­ent to change un­pop­u­lar pro­vi­sions of the law. 

Cor­rec­tion: An earli­er ver­sion of this story mis­stated where Sen. Jeanne Shaheen is from. She is a sen­at­or from New Hamp­shire.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
30 minutes ago
NATIONAL JOURNAL AFTER DARK

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Source:
STATE VS. FEDERAL
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
30 minutes ago
WHY WE CARE

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
30 minutes ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
30 minutes ago
WHY WE CARE

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
1 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”

Source:
×