Can Democrats’ Koch Attacks Work If Nobody Knows Who They Are?

New poll shows voters don’t know much about them, while a Democratic strategist criticizes DSCC strategy.

David Koch and co. don't want their name tied to the Keystone XL Pipeline.
National Journal
Scott Bland
See more stories about...
Scott Bland
March 25, 2014, 6:45 a.m.

After ab­sorb­ing mil­lions of dol­lars in out­side spend­ing from groups con­nec­ted to the Koch broth­ers, con­gres­sion­al Demo­crats have made the con­ser­vat­ive bil­lion­aires the star vil­lains in a mes­saging coun­ter­of­fens­ive. But a new non­par­tis­an poll high­lights a prob­lem with the plan: A ma­jor­ity of likely 2014 voters have nev­er even heard of the Kochs.

A 52 per­cent ma­jor­ity of re­spond­ents in the new George Wash­ing­ton Uni­versity Battle­ground Poll said they had nev­er heard of the Koch broth­ers, with an ad­di­tion­al 11 per­cent say­ing they had no opin­ion of the con­ser­vat­ive in­dus­tri­al­ists. Of the small slice who re­gistered an opin­ion of the Kochs, 12 per­cent viewed them fa­vor­ably and 25 per­cent viewed them un­fa­vor­ably. The sur­vey is one of the first to test opin­ions about the Kochs since they be­came a big sub­ject of polit­ic­al con­ver­sa­tion in the last few years.

From Sen­ate Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Harry Re­id’s floor speeches to his party’s fun­drais­ing emails to re­cent TV ads from Demo­crat­ic can­did­ates and out­side groups, Demo­crats have homed in on the Kochs re­cently. Amer­ic­ans for Prosper­ity, one of the groups af­fil­i­ated with the Kochs, has spent around $30 mil­lion on TV ads against Demo­crat­ic House and Sen­ate can­did­ates ahead of the 2014 elec­tions.

Sev­er­al re­cent Demo­crat­ic TV ads re­spon­ded dir­ectly to the Kochs. Demo­crat­ic Sen. Mark Be­gich’s first TV ad in Alaska blamed “the bil­lion­aire Koch broth­ers” for a series of false at­tacks against him and for shut­ting down an Alaska re­finery, while a new ad from the Sen­ate Ma­jor­ity PAC in Col­or­ado con­nec­ted GOP Rep. Cory Gard­ner to “in­sur­ance com­pan­ies and out-of-state bil­lion­aires” fund­ing at­tack ads against Sen. Mark Ud­all be­cause Gard­ner’s policies, the nar­rat­or said, would be bet­ter for in­sur­ance com­pan­ies.

Celinda Lake, a Demo­crat­ic poll­ster whose firm helped con­duct the poll, said at the Chris­ti­an Sci­ence Mon­it­or Break­fast on Wed­nes­day that what the Kochs rep­res­ent, not the men them­selves, is what will res­on­ate with voters.

“I think the mes­saging around how they are is the ef­fect­ive piece,” Lake said, not­ing that groups af­fil­i­ated with the Kochs have taken cri­ti­cism for us­ing out-of-state act­ors in Sen­ate TV ads and for “ag­gress­ively” ad­voc­at­ing So­cial Se­cur­ity privat­iz­a­tion. “When they at­tach that sub­stance to the [Re­pub­lic­an] can­did­ates and also talk about out­side money, it’s go­ing to be more ef­fect­ive.”

Ed Goe­as, the Re­pub­lic­an poll­ster in­volved with the sur­vey, said the hub­bub about the Kochs was more about fun­drais­ing and ril­ing up the Demo­crat­ic base than com­mu­nic­at­ing to the broad­er elect­or­ate.

“You al­ways want to have some red meat to feed your base,” Goe­as said, though he ad­ded that he wasn’t sure how ef­fect­ive it would be. Both parties have tried at­tack­ing the sources of out­side money in the past, and Goe­as dis­missed the res­ults. “I think try­ing to make the Koch broth­ers that red meat is go­ing to be about as ef­fect­ive as what we tried to do with George Sor­os,” he said.

It’s not only Re­pub­lic­ans who are dis­missive of the Koch strategy. Thomas Mills, a North Car­o­lina-based Demo­crat­ic strategist, con­curred in a column pub­lished Tues­day. Con­cerned about the one-note Demo­crat­ic mes­saging, Mills wrote that Demo­crats have “ceded the polit­ic­al agenda to the Koch Broth­ers and the Re­pub­lic­ans. They should be at­tack­ing GOP policies and can­did­ates, not GOP fun­ders.” Mills ar­gued that Thom Tillis, the lead­ing GOP chal­lenger against Demo­crat­ic Sen. Kay Hagan, has plenty of more po­tent vul­ner­ab­il­it­ies stem­ming from his ten­ure as state House speak­er.

“He’s just an­oth­er phony politi­cian. Ex­pose him, not the Kochs. He’s the one on the bal­lot,” Mills writes.

The George Wash­ing­ton Uni­versity Battle­ground Poll, con­duc­ted by the Tar­rance Group and Lake Re­search Part­ners, sur­veyed 1,000 likely voters from March 16 through March 20. The poll’s mar­gin of er­ror is plus or minus 3.1 per­cent­age points.

What We're Following See More »
‘PRESUMPTIVE NOMINEE’
Priebus Asks Party to Unite Behind Trump
9 hours ago
THE LATEST
FEELING THE MIDWESTERN BERN
Sanders Upsets Clinton in Indiana
10 hours ago
THE LATEST

Despite trailing Hillary Clinton by a significant margin, Bernie Sanders wasn't going the way of Ted Cruz tonight. The Vermont senator upset Clinton in Indiana, with MSNBC calling the race at 9pm. Sanders appears poised to win by a five- or six-point spread.

Source:
TRUMP IS PRESUMPTIVE NOMINEE
Ted Cruz Bows Out, Effectively Ceding the Contest to Trump
11 hours ago
THE LATEST

And just like that, it's over. Ted Cruz will suspend his presidential campaign after losing badly to Donald Trump in Indiana tonight. "While Cruz had always hedged when asked whether he would quit if he lost Indiana; his campaign had laid a huge bet on the state." John Kasich's campaign has pledged to carry on. “From the beginning, I’ve said that I would continue on as long as there was a viable path to victory,” said Cruz. “Tonight, I’m sorry to say it appears that path has been foreclosed."

Source:
TAKES AT LEAST 45 DELEGATES
Trump Wins Indiana, All but Seals the Nomination
11 hours ago
THE LATEST

The Republican establishment's last remaining hope—a contested convention this summer—may have just ended in Indiana, as Donald Trump won a decisive victory over Ted Cruz. Nothing Cruz seemed to have in his corner seemed to help—not a presumptive VP pick in Carly Fiorina, not a midwestern state where he's done well in the past, and not the state's legions of conservatives. Though Trump "won't secure the 1,237 delegates he needs to formally claim the nomination until June, his Indiana triumph makes it almost impossible to stop him. Following his decisive wins in New York and other East Coast states, the Indiana victory could put Trump within 200 delegates of the magic number he needs to clinch the nomination." Cruz, meanwhile, "now faces the agonizing choice of whether to remain in the race, with his attempt to force the party into a contested convention in tatters, or to bow out and cede the party nomination to his political nemesis." The Associated Press, which called the race at 7pm, predicts Trump will win at least 45 delegates.

Source:
THE QUESTION
What’s the Average Household Income of a Trump Voter?
16 hours ago
THE ANSWER

Seventy-two thousand dollars, according to FiveThirtyEight. That's higher than the national average, as well as the average Clinton or Sanders voter, but lower than the average Kasich voter.

Source:
×