Democrats to Nate Silver: You’re Wrong

Guy Cecil says the famed statistician was wrong in 2012 and will be wrong again in 2014 with his prediction of a GOP Senate takeover.

NEW YORK, NY - MAY 21: Nate Silver attends the 16th Annual Webby Awards at Hammerstein Ballroom on May 21, 2012 in New York City.
National Journal
Alex Roarty
March 24, 2014, midnight

Demo­crats aren’t tak­ing Nate Sil­ver’s latest Sen­ate pre­dic­tion ly­ing down.

In an un­usu­al step, the ex­ec­ut­ive dir­ect­or of the Demo­crat­ic Sen­at­ori­al Cam­paign Com­mit­tee on Monday is­sued a re­but­tal the famed stat­ist­i­cian’s pre­dic­tion — made a day earli­er — that Re­pub­lic­ans were a “slight fa­vor­ite” to re­take the Sen­ate. Sil­ver was wrong in 2012, the polit­ic­al com­mit­tee’s Guy Cecil wrote in a memo, and he’ll be wrong again in 2014.

“In fact, in Au­gust of 2012 Sil­ver fore­cast a 61 per­cent like­li­hood that Re­pub­lic­ans would pick up enough seats to claim the ma­jor­ity,” Cecil said. “Three months later, Demo­crats went on to win 55 seats.”

The DSCC memo took pains to com­pli­ment Sil­ver, say­ing his work at newly launched Fiv­eThirtyEight was “ground­break­ing.” And the group’s main cri­tique — that Sil­ver’s mod­el re­lies on a smat­ter­ing of haphaz­ard early polling in battle­ground states — is one that he him­self ac­know­ledges is a lim­it­a­tion.

But the com­pre­hens­ive push­back from Cecil, the power­ful com­mit­tee’s key staffer, is a test­a­ment both to the in­flu­ence Sil­ver wields and the sens­it­iv­ity of Sen­ate Demo­crats to the per­cep­tion they’re los­ing their grip on the up­per cham­ber. Oth­er out­lets have sug­ges­ted sim­il­ar odds on the Sen­ate, but none have earned this kind of re­but­tal.

Sil­ver earned fame and for­tune after he cor­rectly pre­dicted the out­come of the last pres­id­en­tial elec­tion des­pite the skep­ti­cism of many pun­dits, a res­ult that also earned him a great deal of cred­ib­il­ity with many voters. (In fun­drais­ing pitches this cycle, Demo­crats reg­u­larly in­voke his earli­er pre­dic­tion that the battle for Sen­ate con­trol was a “toss-up.”)

But in the memo, Cecil ar­gues that Sil­ver’s track re­cord is less than stel­lar. It cites four races in which Demo­crats won des­pite Sil­ver once pre­dict­ing oth­er­wise: Heidi Heitkamp in North Dakota and John Test­er in Montana in 2012, and Harry Re­id in Nevada and Mi­chael Ben­net in Col­or­ado in 2010.

“All four are sen­at­ors today be­cause they were su­per­i­or can­did­ates run­ning su­per­i­or cam­paign or­gan­iz­a­tions who made their elec­tions a choice between the two can­did­ates on the bal­lot,” said the ex­ec­ut­ive dir­ect­or. “Only three Demo­crat­ic in­cum­bent sen­at­ors have lost reelec­tion in the last 10 years, and our in­cum­bents are once again pre­pared and ready.”

The nearly 1,000-word missive goes on to cite the ef­fect­ive­ness of the party’s at­tacks against con­ser­vat­ive third-party spend­ing, its $60 mil­lion field and voter-con­tact pro­gram known as the “Ban­nock Street Pro­ject,” and the op­por­tun­ity Demo­crats have in GOP-held seats in Ken­tucky and Geor­gia. “We don’t min­im­ize the chal­lenges ahead,” he said. “Rather, we view the latest pro­jec­tion as a re­mind­er that we have a chal­len­ging map and im­port­ant work still to do in or­der to pre­serve our ma­jor­ity.”

In truth, Sil­ver’s sug­ges­tions that Re­pub­lic­ans are fa­vor­ites to win the Sen­ate matched the as­sess­ment of most ana­lysts in Wash­ing­ton. A map that has Demo­crats de­fend­ing sev­en red states (Re­pub­lic­ans would need to win six to re­claim the ma­jor­ity), Pres­id­ent Obama’s slid­ing ap­prov­al rat­ings, and the mul­ti­mil­lions of dol­lars spent by out­side groups led by the Koch broth­ers-backed Amer­ic­ans for Prosper­ity have com­bined to give the GOP a clear op­por­tun­ity at the ma­jor­ity. Even be­fore Obama­care’s polit­ic­ally dis­astrous rol­lout, Demo­crat­ic strategists privately ac­know­ledged that con­trol of the Sen­ate was far from guar­an­teed in 2015.

What We're Following See More »
STAYING RELEVANT TIL 2020?
Rubio May Run for Reelection After All
11 hours ago
WHY WE CARE
AKNOWLEDGING THE INEVITABLE
UAW: Time to Unite Behind Hillary
14 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"It's about time for unity," said UAW President Dennis Williams. "We're endorsing Hillary Clinton. She's gotten 3 million more votes than Bernie, a million more votes than Donald Trump. She's our nominee." He called Sanders "a great friend of the UAW" while saying Trump "does not support the economic security of UAW families." Some 28 percent of UAW members indicated their support for Trump in an internal survey.

Source:
AP KEEPING COUNT
Trump Clinches Enough Delegates for the Nomination
16 hours ago
THE LATEST

"Donald Trump on Thursday reached the number of delegates needed to clinch the Republican nomination for president, completing an unlikely rise that has upended the political landscape and sets the stage for a bitter fall campaign. Trump was put over the top in the Associated Press delegate count by a small number of the party's unbound delegates who told the AP they would support him at the convention."

Source:
TRUMP FLOATED IDEA ON JIMMY KIMMEL’S SHOW
Trump/Sanders Debate Before California Primary?
17 hours ago
THE LATEST
CAMPAIGNS INJECTED NEW AD MONEY
California: It’s Not Over Yet
17 hours ago
THE LATEST

"Clinton and Bernie Sanders "are now devoting additional money to television advertising. A day after Sanders announced a new ad buy of less than $2 million in the state, Clinton announced her own television campaign. Ads featuring actor Morgan Freeman as well as labor leader and civil rights activist Dolores Huerta will air beginning on Fridayin Fresno, Sacramento, and Los Angeles media markets. Some ads will also target Latino voters and Asian American voters. The total value of the buy is about six figures according to the Clinton campaign." Meanwhile, a new poll shows Sanders within the margin of error, trailing Clinton 44%-46%.

Source:
×