Are Some Senate Democrats Too Likable to Vote Out?

Republicans are hoping to make races a referendum on policy, not personality.

Warner: "Look at Simpson-Bowles."
National Journal
Alex Roarty
See more stories about...
Alex Roarty
March 24, 2014, 1 a.m.

Re­pub­lic­ans are count­ing on a fa­vor­able en­vir­on­ment and tar­get-rich map to carry them to a Sen­ate ma­jor­ity in 2015. But stand­ing between them and vic­tory are a slew of Demo­crat­ic in­cum­bents who, while vul­ner­able, have one im­port­ant ad­vant­age: People like them.

There’s no bet­ter ex­ample than in New Hamp­shire, home to one of the coun­try’s most eagerly an­ti­cip­ated races after Scott Brown made a de facto cam­paign de­clar­a­tion earli­er this month against Demo­crat­ic Sen. Jeanne Shaheen. The former GOP sen­at­or from Mas­sachu­setts is a strong can­did­ate in his own right, well-known and cap­able of rais­ing mil­lions of dol­lars. But his op­pon­ent is no or­din­ary in­cum­bent: She’s a former six-year gov­ernor whose ten­ure stretches back dec­ades in a small state where voters get to know their elec­ted of­fi­cials well.

And she has the poll num­bers to back it up: Des­pite her vote for Pres­id­ent Obama’s deeply un­pop­u­lar health care law, half of New Hamp­shire’s adults re­gard Shaheen pos­it­ively, ac­cord­ing to a WMUR Gran­ite State poll from Janu­ary. (Only 34 per­cent viewed her un­fa­vor­ably.) In oth­er words, she’s in a far dif­fer­ent place polit­ic­ally than the last Demo­crat­ic wo­man Brown took down to earn a place in the Sen­ate.

“He’s go­ing to find she’s no Martha Coakley,” said Tom Rath, a former New Hamp­shire Re­pub­lic­an at­tor­ney gen­er­al. “This is a per­son people in this state know really well and are very com­fort­able with.”

Re­pub­lic­ans should be en­cour­aged that chal­lengers like Brown have signed up to take on Demo­crat­ic law­makers des­pite their pop­ular­ity — an in­dic­a­tion that they think a na­tion­al mood sour on Demo­crats will trump the daunt­ing pro­spect of tak­ing on well-en­trenched in­cum­bents. But GOP strategists warn that these chal­lengers face a more com­plic­ated path to vic­tory, one that will force them to care­fully cal­ib­rate a strategy that can sim­ul­tan­eously cri­tique their op­pon­ents but do so without re­ly­ing on an as­sault on the Demo­crats’ char­ac­ter.

“You can ar­gue wheth­er she’s too close to the pres­id­ent or Harry Re­id, but there’s no ques­tion the people have known her, known her fam­ily, for 30 years,” Rath said. “It’s go­ing to be hard to make her in­to a per­son who’s not likable.”

Re­pub­lic­ans face a sim­il­ar obstacle in Vir­gin­ia where Sen. Mark Warner, a former gov­ernor, awaits. Sen. Mark Ud­all, whose fam­ily name is le­gendary in Demo­crat­ic circles, is up for reelec­tion in Col­or­ado. Both have the type of repu­ta­tion that makes them more than just a gen­er­ic mem­ber of their party. Warner has long in­cul­cated a repu­ta­tion as a cent­rist, and polls have re­por­ted his ap­prov­al rat­ing north of 60 per­cent.

Ud­all isn’t as well-liked, but more voters than not have a fa­vor­able im­age of him as he be­gins his reelec­tion cam­paign. A sur­vey from the Demo­crat­ic firm Hick­man As­so­ci­ates In­ter­na­tion­al, con­duc­ted on be­half of the Con­sumer En­ergy Al­li­ance (a group that sup­ports build­ing the Key­stone XL pipeline), found that 47 per­cent of state res­id­ents saw him very or some­what un­fa­vor­ably; only 26 per­cent viewed him un­fa­vor­ably.

Those are the kind of num­bers Demo­crat­ic op­er­at­ives say they can use to make the con­tests a loc­al match­up of per­son­al­it­ies, not just in the troika of blue states but pos­sibly with Mark Pry­or in Arkan­sas and Mary Landrieu in Louisi­ana. Shaheen, for in­stance, can talk about fund­ing she de­livered for a loc­al fire­house while Re­pub­lic­ans talk breath­lessly about the pres­id­ent and Re­id.

It’s a strategy they ar­gue worked well in 2012, when Re­pub­lic­ans tried and failed to make an ar­ray of Sen­ate races a na­tion­al ref­er­en­dum.

“Re­pub­lic­ans’ only hope is to make these races about something else oth­er than the names on the bal­lot,” said Justin Barasky, spokes­man for the Demo­crat­ic Sen­at­ori­al Cam­paign Com­mit­tee. “And it didn’t work for them last cycle.”

GOP op­er­at­ives in­volved in their races this year stress their can­did­ates know that cam­paign­ing against a pop­u­lar in­cum­bent like Warner is dif­fer­ent. It starts, they say, by un­der­stand­ing how they talk about him or her with voters has to be meas­ured, at least in the early go­ing.

“If some­body starts off with a per­son­al fa­vor­ab­il­ity rat­ing that might be high, if you start go­ing and say­ing they shouldn’t like them, you’re prob­ably go­ing to run in­to a brick wall,” said Dan Al­len, a Re­pub­lic­an op­er­at­ive based in Vir­gin­ia.

In­stead, Al­len urged Re­pub­lic­ans to keep their at­tacks fo­cused tightly on policy, es­pe­cially Obama­care. The cri­ti­cism isn’t ne­ces­sar­ily about per­suad­ing people then and there to vote against him, but rather part of a longer game to con­vince them that their long-held im­age of Warner as a cent­rist doesn’t match what he’s done in of­fice. At which point, voters will be more open-minded about oth­er ar­gu­ments against him.

It’s a play­book that Warner’s op­pon­ent, former chair­man of the Re­pub­lic­an Na­tion­al Com­mit­tee Ed Gillespie, ap­pears to be fol­low­ing. A Web video re­leased by his cam­paign com­pares and con­trasts the two can­did­ates’ stance on Obama­care while the law was de­bated in 2009, sug­gest­ing that Warner “broke his word” to his con­stitu­ents by vot­ing for it.

“Go­ing after likab­il­ity as your first punch, or your first ad­vance — that’s go­ing to turn more people off than you’re go­ing to get,” Al­len said. “The smart cam­paigns are the ones that look at it and say, ‘I’m not go­ing to make it per­son­al. I don’t need to. Let me use some of these things out there already.’ “

Not every­one frets that GOP can­did­ates need to tip­toe by their op­pon­ents. Op­er­at­ives at the Na­tion­al Re­pub­lic­an Sen­at­ori­al Com­mit­tee say their own in­tern­al polling on Shaheen, Warner, and Landrieu show at least a plur­al­ity of voters think a new per­son should take of­fice. In oth­er words: Voters are ready to throw the bums out.

Ed Beth­une, a former GOP House mem­ber from Arkan­sas who chal­lenged Mark Pyror’s fath­er, Dav­id, for his Sen­ate seat in 1984, says the eld­er Pry­or’s pop­ular­ity rendered his chal­lenge little more than a long shot — even dur­ing Ron­ald Re­agan’s land­slide reelec­tion win.

But that was 30 years ago, he adds, be­fore voters star­ted caring about party af­fil­i­ation and stopped caring about the per­son­al­it­ies be­hind them. Now voters know what they want in a politi­cian, and in Arkan­sas, it’s not a Demo­crat.

“I kid Dav­id Pry­or all the time, ‘Why don’t we re­run our race this year?’ ” Beth­une said.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
23 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Maher Weighs in on Bernie, Trump and Palin
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

“We haven’t seen a true leftist since FDR, so many millions are coming out of the woodwork to vote for Bernie Sanders; he is the Occupy movement now come to life in the political arena.” So says Bill Maher in his Hollywood Reporter cover story (more a stream-of-consciousness riff than an essay, actually). Conservative states may never vote for a socialist in the general election, but “this stuff has never been on the table, and these voters have never been activated.” Maher saves most of his bile for Donald Trump and Sarah Palin, writing that by nominating Palin as vice president “John McCain is the one who opened the Book of the Dead and let the monsters out.” And Trump is picking up where Palin left off.

Source:
×