The Curious Votes of the GOP’s Favorite Candidate

The votes that have made Tom Cotton a Republican star might help his opponent in the fall.

National Journal
Alex Roarty
Jan. 29, 2014, 9:03 a.m.

Law­makers des­per­ate to win their next elec­tion usu­ally cast votes with the ut­most polit­ic­al sens­it­iv­ity. And then there’s Tom Cot­ton.

The fresh­man Re­pub­lic­an con­gress­man voted against the farm bill Wed­nes­day des­pite his home state of Arkan­sas’s heavy agrari­an bent, be­cause he said the le­gis­la­tion would spend too much on food stamps. He was the only one of the state’s four-mem­ber, all-GOP House del­eg­a­tion to do so (the state’s Re­pub­lic­an sen­at­or, John Booz­man, is also ex­pec­ted to back the le­gis­la­tion). To the cas­u­al ob­serv­er, it’s a strange vote for a man en­gaged in a tough race to un­seat Demo­crat Mark Pry­or in this year’s Sen­ate race, an in­cum­bent who, of course, will vote for the bill.

But for Cot­ton, his op­pos­i­tion was part of a broad­er pat­tern. He’s made one polit­ic­ally risky de­cision after an­oth­er, votes that seem at odds with a can­did­ate try­ing to knock off a once-pop­u­lar in­cum­bent.

Since tak­ing of­fice last year, Cot­ton has voted against the Vi­ol­ence Against Wo­men Act, op­posed lower­ing stu­dent-loan rates, and backed a budget that would tinker with Medi­care and So­cial Se­cur­ity. Most vis­ibly, he has been one of the House’s most out­spoken sup­port­ers of us­ing the U.S. mil­it­ary in Syr­ia, writ­ing an op-ed in sup­port of ac­tion in The Wash­ing­ton Post. In some cases, like the farm bill, he was out on a limb, without the sup­port of his fel­low Arkan­sas Re­pub­lic­ans.

A typ­ic­al politi­cian, it’s fair to say, wouldn’t do those sorts of things ahead of a com­pet­it­ive gen­er­al elec­tion. Every vote they take is care­fully cal­ib­rated to give them the best pos­sible op­por­tun­ity to win their race.

Take Pry­or. He voted against ex­pand­ing gun-sale back­ground checks and con­tin­ues to op­pose gay mar­riage. Both put him at odds with his party and fig­ure to help him, however mar­gin­ally, in the fall.

And while Re­pub­lic­ans say they’re the kind of votes that have helped make Cot­ton a rising star in the party, they also un­doubtedly provide an open­ing to Demo­crats, who want to paint the con­gress­man as reck­less and out of the main­stream.

“In vot­ing against the farm bill, Con­gress­man Cot­ton once again sided with his spe­cial-in­terest al­lies, the same Wash­ing­ton groups spend­ing mil­lions on his cam­paign that urged him to op­pose the farm bill,” Pry­or said in a state­ment. “It’s reck­less and ir­re­spons­ible for Con­gress­man Cot­ton to put his own am­bi­tions ahead of what’s best for Arkansans, and the people of our state de­serve bet­ter.”

Those votes, along with his back­ground as an Army Ranger who served de­ploy­ments in Ir­aq and Afgh­anistan, have made him a star among fisc­al and na­tion­al se­cur­ity con­ser­vat­ives alike — he’s per­haps the only es­tab­lish­ment-backed Sen­ate can­did­ate on the map this year about whom con­ser­vat­ives are also ex­cited. And in his sup­port­ers’ telling, Cot­ton’s votes are driv­en by prin­ciple, not polit­ics. They ar­gue that voters will see his re­cord the same way.

“The votes and po­s­i­tions Tom takes are a policy de­cision, not polit­ic­al de­cision,” said Cot­ton’s spokes­wo­man, Car­oline Rab­bit. “Tom al­ways says he learned in the Army that lead­er­ship is tak­ing the hard right over the easy wrong, and I think that’s an ac­cur­ate way to de­scribe things here. Tom is a lead­er. He’s been elec­ted by his con­stitu­ents to rep­res­ent their best in­terests and sup­port Arkansans and put our state and na­tion back on a path of fisc­al re­spons­ib­il­ity.”

In private, Cot­ton back­ers might con­cede that his votes aren’t per­fect polit­ic­ally, but that they won’t mat­ter, be­cause Pres­id­ent Obama’s di­min­ished stand­ing and Arkan­sas’s grow­ing con­ser­vat­ism already make the con­gress­man a strong fa­vor­ite. They might be right. But for now, Pry­or’s biggest hopes for vic­tory might come dir­ectly from Cot­ton’s own vot­ing re­cord.

What We're Following See More »
LEGACY PLAY
Sanders and Clinton Spar Over … President Obama
3 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama became a surprise topic of contention toward the end of the Democratic debate, as Hillary Clinton reminded viewers that Sanders had challenged the progressive bona fides of President Obama in 2011 and suggested that someone might challenge him from the left. “The kind of criticism that we’ve heard from Senator Sanders about our president I expect from Republicans, I do not expect from someone running for the Democratic nomination to succeed President Obama,” she said. “Madame Secretary, that is a low blow,” replied Sanders, before getting in another dig during his closing statement: “One of us ran against Barack Obama. I was not that candidate.”

THE 1%
Sanders’s Appeals to Minorities Still Filtered Through Wall Street Talk
4 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

It’s all about the 1% and Wall Street versus everyone else for Bernie Sanders—even when he’s talking about race relations. Like Hillary Clinton, he needs to appeal to African-American and Hispanic voters in coming states, but he insists on doing so through his lens of class warfare. When he got a question from the moderators about the plight of black America, he noted that during the great recession, African Americans “lost half their wealth,” and “instead of tax breaks for billionaires,” a Sanders presidency would deliver jobs for kids. On the very next question, he downplayed the role of race in inequality, saying, “It’s a racial issue, but it’s also a general economic issue.”

DIRECT APPEAL TO MINORITIES, WOMEN
Clinton Already Pivoting Her Messaging
5 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

It’s been said in just about every news story since New Hampshire: the primaries are headed to states where Hillary Clinton will do well among minority voters. Leaving nothing to chance, she underscored that point in her opening statement in the Milwaukee debate tonight, saying more needs to be done to help “African Americans who face discrimination in the job market” and immigrant families. She also made an explicit reference to “equal pay for women’s work.” Those boxes she’s checking are no coincidence: if she wins women, blacks and Hispanics, she wins the nomination.

THE QUESTION
How Many Jobs Would Be Lost Under Bernie Sanders’s Single-Payer System?
13 hours ago
THE ANSWER

More than 11 million, according to Manhattan Institute fellow Yevgeniy Feyman, writing in RealClearPolicy.

Source:
WEEKEND DATA DUMP
State to Release 550 More Clinton Emails on Saturday
13 hours ago
THE LATEST

Under pressure from a judge, the State Department will release about 550 of Hillary Clinton’s emails—“roughly 14 percent of the 3,700 remaining Clinton emails—on Saturday, in the middle of the Presidents Day holiday weekend.” All of the emails were supposed to have been released last month. Related: State subpoenaed the Clinton Foundation last year, which brings the total number of current Clinton investigations to four, says the Daily Caller.

Source:
×