For once this year, the surprise was a good one for Montana Democrats.
The White House’s out-of-the-blue decision to name Sen. Max Baucus the next ambassador to China means the state’s Democratic governor must appoint a successor long before next year’s Senate election. And that will fundamentally change one of 2014’s biggest battleground races: Instead of a free-for-all, open-seat battle, Democrats will get to rally behind a better-entrenched incumbent seeking a full term.
It’s the rare recent positive development for Montana Democrats. The party’s chances of retaining the Senate seat dimmed considerably in the spring when Baucus surprisingly opted against seeking reelection, a loss compounded when former Gov. Brian Schweitzer unexpectedly declined to mount his own campaign, during the summer.
But now, just as the seat seemed to be slipping out of their reach, the race changed in Democrats’ favor. They still likely enter the election as underdogs, but their chances suddenly look better.
Politico first reported the Baucus news Thursday. It also reported that Montana’s governor, Steve Bullock, would like tap his lieutenant governor, John Walsh, to fill Baucus’s seat. That wouldn’t be a surprise: Walsh was already running for the Senate, was the favorite of the Democratic establishment, and has personally been praised by Bullock as a strong candidate. In the words of one Montana Democratic insider, “There’s no doubt it’s going to be Walsh.”
The former member of the National Guard — a political neophyte until Bullock named him his running mate in 2012 — was already considered the strongest candidate for the job. But an appointment into the Senate offers a measurable boost to his candidacy, both in terms of name recognition among voters and fundraising.
“When you’re just a candidate, there’s only so much for the press to cover,” said the Montana Democratic strategist. “And there’s only so much they have to cover. Your ability to get free media as a senator in a place like Montana is really significant. It’s a really big deal for Walsh.”
Challenges remain. Schweitzer’s decision to pass opened the door for Republican Rep. Steve Daines to run, and the GOP universally regards him as their strongest possible contender. Despite a history of electing Democratic officials statewide, Montana is a deep shade of red for presidential elections, and midterm years are harder still for Democrats. Along with Obamacare’s disastrous rollout and the president’s own sinking approvals, the fundamentals of the race still tilt solidly toward the GOP.
And taking Baucus’s seat will also tarnish Walsh’s image as a political outsider. Running against Washington, as Walsh certainly would have done, isn’t easy for incumbents, even if Walsh will have been on the job for only a matter of months. “The deal undercuts the lone argument that Democrats have made for John Walsh’s candidacy — that he’s from outside of Washington with no attachment to President Obama and the Democratic leadership or agenda,” said Brad Dayspring, communications director for the National Republican Senatorial Committee. “That argument is now moot, since Walsh is now Harry Reid and Barack Obama’s hand-picked United States senator.”
Dayspring called the deal the “Big Sky Buy-Off.”
Walsh also had a primary opponent, former Lt. Gov. John Bohlinger. Whether Bohlinger would continue a primary campaign after Walsh’s appointment is unclear.
Still, Democratic operatives in the state greeted Thursday’s news optimistically. It’s still an uphill battle, but the climb is now a little easier.
“I think people were realistic about fact that any time a Democrat runs in Montana, it’s a hard race,” said one Democratic operative. “Nobody was gilding the lily; everybody understood it’s tough when Max Baucus ran, it’s tough when Jon Tester ran his races.
“But, at the same time, there’s a view it’s clearly going to help to have Walsh in the driver’s seat.”
- 1 Smart Ideas, Convention Edition: Democrats’ Real Fault Line Is Over the Obama Years
- 2 Amid DNC Drama, Women Focus on Clinton’s Milestone
- 3 On Deck for Wednesday at the Democratic National Convention
- 4 Bill Clinton Tries to Humanize His Wife With a Political Love Story
- 5 Democrats Have A Health Care Platform, But Not Much Appetite To Fight For It
What We're Following See More »
“In the spring of 1971, I met a girl,” started Bill Clinton. In his speech Tuesday night at the Democratic National Convention, Clinton brought a personal touch, telling parallel stories of his relationship with Hillary Clinton and the work she has done throughout her career. He lauded the Democratic nominee for her career of work, touching on her earliest days of advocacy for children and those with disabilities while in law school, her role as Secretary of State, and her work in raising their daughter, Chelsea. Providing a number of anecdotes throughout the speech, Clinton built to a crescendo, imploring the audience to support his wife for president. "You should elect her, she'll never quit when the going gets tough," he said. "Your children and grandchildren will be grateful."
A coalition of mothers whose children lost their lives in high profile cases across the country, known as the Mothers Of The Movement, were greeted with deafening chants of "Black Lives Matter" before telling their stories. The mothers of Sandra Bland, Jordan Davis, and Trayvon Martin spoke for the group, soliciting both tears and applause from the crowd. "Hillary Clinton has the compassion and understanding to comfort a grieving mother," said Sybrina Fulton, the mother of Trayvon Martin. "And that's why, in the memory of our children, we are imploring you — all of you — to vote this election day."
With the South Dakota delegation announcing its delegate count, Hillary Rodham Clinton is officially the Democratic nominee for president, surpassing the 2383 delegates needed to clinch the nomination. Clinton is expected to speak at the convention on Thursday night and officially accept the nomination.
About 5,500, according to official estimates. "The Monday figures marked a large increase from the protests at the Republican National Convention in Cleveland, where even the largest protests only drew a couple of hundred demonstrators. But it’s a far cry from the 35,000 to 50,000 that Philadelphia city officials initially expected."
Only a day after FiveThirtyEight's Now Cast gave Donald Trump a 57% chance of winning, the New York Times' Upshot fires back with its own analysis that shows Hillary Clinton with a 68% chance to be the next president. Its model "calculates win probabilities for each state," which incorporate recent polls plus "a state's past election results and national polling." Notably, all of the battleground states that "vote like the country as a whole" either lean toward Clinton or are toss-ups. None lean toward Trump.