For Texas tea partiers, the space between Senate hero and Senate villain is just 26 votes.
That is the number of times John Cornyn has cast a different vote this year than the state’s other senator, the tea party-preferred Ted Cruz.
It works out to less than 10 percent of the 273 (and counting) roll calls the Senate has taken in 2013.
And in some of those votes, including a handful of judicial confirmations for Obama administration appointees, Cornyn staked out a more conservative position than his fellow Texan, who has become a grassroots GOP star in the past two years.
But don’t tell that to his tea-party critics. Indeed, while Cruz has been cheered back home for his work in Washington, plenty of activists in Texas have been hoping for the chance to defeat Cornyn in the Texas Republican primary. Some tea-party groups had tried for months to recruit a well-known challenger. (Idiosyncratic Rep. Steve Stockman submitted papers to take up their cause just minutes before the filing deadline last week. Since then, he’s bashed Cornyn as “liberal John Cornyn.”)
“The problem with Sen. Cornyn isn’t that he’s some big liberal,” said JoAnn Fleming, executive director for one of the groups, Grassroots America We the People, which tried to recruit a challenger to Cornyn. “He continues to do fundraisers and offer support for establishment-type Republicans who we believe aren’t helping to get to the root of the problem: big government…. He’s done some things we believe aren’t in the best interest of the country because they continue to grow government.”
Of course, it’s the content of particular split votes, not the total number, that most animates Cornyn’s detractors. (This analysis counted roll calls in which both senators voted. Cornyn and Cruz have missed five and 16 votes this year, respectively.)
He and Cruz have diverged infrequently, but one such vote was on a cloture motion for a spending bill just before the federal government shut down this fall. Days earlier on Fox News Sunday, Cruz had said, “A vote for cloture is a vote for Obamacare.”
And Cornyn has also taken past votes — especially the one to let the federal government bail out endangered banks during the financial crisis of 2008 — that have infuriated some conservatives.
That, along with Cornyn’s status in leadership (the Senate’s No. 2 Republican and two recent terms at the helm of the National Republican Senatorial Committee), has fueled some disquiet about the Lone Star State’s senior senator since he won a thoroughly uninteresting primary in 2008 with 81 percent of the vote.
But as his official duties go, there is little daylight between Cornyn and the favorite of the activists working to unseat him.
What We're Following See More »
Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”
“We haven’t seen a true leftist since FDR, so many millions are coming out of the woodwork to vote for Bernie Sanders; he is the Occupy movement now come to life in the political arena.” So says Bill Maher in his Hollywood Reporter cover story (more a stream-of-consciousness riff than an essay, actually). Conservative states may never vote for a socialist in the general election, but “this stuff has never been on the table, and these voters have never been activated.” Maher saves most of his bile for Donald Trump and Sarah Palin, writing that by nominating Palin as vice president “John McCain is the one who opened the Book of the Dead and let the monsters out.” And Trump is picking up where Palin left off.