How the White House Is Changing Obamacare to Comply With Hobby Lobby

HHS released new regulations on the law’s contraception mandate

National Journal
Sam Baker
Aug. 22, 2014, 10:26 a.m.

The Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion re­leased new plans Fri­day to soften Obama­care’s con­tra­cep­tion man­date in re­sponse to the Su­preme Court’s Hobby Lobby rul­ing.

Cer­tain for-profit com­pan­ies, like Hobby Lobby, will be able to avoid dir­ectly cov­er­ing birth con­trol, us­ing the same “ac­com­mod­a­tion” avail­able to em­ploy­ers like Cath­ol­ic hos­pit­als and uni­versit­ies.

The Health and Hu­man Ser­vices De­part­ment also pro­posed new guidelines for how em­ploy­ers should re­gister their re­li­gious ob­jec­tions to cov­er­ing birth con­trol””an at­tempt to ac­com­mod­ate re­li­gious groups that ob­ject to filling out a par­tic­u­lar form.

The Af­ford­able Care Act re­quires most em­ploy­ers to in­clude all FDA-ap­proved con­tra­cept­ives in their work­ers’ health care plans, without char­ging a co-pay or de­duct­ible. But some busi­ness own­ers said the re­quire­ment would force them to vi­ol­ate their re­li­gious be­liefs.

The Su­preme Court ruled in June that “closely held” cor­por­a­tions do not have to com­ply with the birth-con­trol man­date if their own­ers have a re­li­gious ob­jec­tion. The court said HHS should find a less re­strict­ive means of en­sur­ing that wo­men have ac­cess to con­tra­cep­tion cov­er­age, and HHS out­lined that op­tion on Fri­day.

Un­der HHS’s latest pro­pos­al, closely held for-profit com­pan­ies would be able use the same work­around as re­li­gious-af­fil­i­ated em­ploy­ers, such as Cath­ol­ic hos­pit­als.

If those em­ploy­ers ob­ject to cov­er­ing cer­tain forms of con­tra­cep­tion in their health care plans, they can push the cov­er­age bur­den to their in­sur­ance com­pan­ies. The em­ploy­ers don’t have to pay for the cov­er­age or tell em­ploy­ees how to use it, and in­surers are pro­hib­ited from pad­ding the com­pany’s premi­ums to pay for the be­ne­fit.

The White House has said the work­around won’t be a prob­lem for in­sur­ance com­pan­ies be­cause con­tra­cep­tion is re­l­at­ively in­ex­pens­ive””and far less ex­pens­ive than cov­er­ing a preg­nancy and a child.

The Beck­et Fund for Re­li­gious Liberty, which has helped co­ordin­ate the leg­al chal­lenges to the man­date, said it was still re­view­ing the pro­pos­al, call­ing it “the latest step in the ad­min­is­tra­tion’s long re­treat” from the ori­gin­al man­date.

Also on Fri­day, HHS pro­posed changes in the pro­cess re­li­gious em­ploy­ers use to claim an ex­emp­tion. Em­ploy­ers can no­ti­fy the gov­ern­ment that they ob­ject to cov­er­ing birth con­trol, rather than send­ing a no­tice to their in­sur­ance com­pany.

Some re­li­gious groups, in­clud­ing Wheaton Col­lege and a Cath­ol­ic or­gan­iz­a­tion called Little Sis­ters of the Poor, said their re­li­gious be­liefs were threatened when they filed the form with their in­sur­ance com­pan­ies. They ar­gued that be­cause they knew that fil­ing the form would ac­tiv­ate cov­er­age of a drug they find im­mor­al, they shouldn’t have to be­gin that pro­cess.

What We're Following See More »
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
1 days ago

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Maher Weighs in on Bernie, Trump and Palin
1 days ago

“We haven’t seen a true leftist since FDR, so many millions are coming out of the woodwork to vote for Bernie Sanders; he is the Occupy movement now come to life in the political arena.” So says Bill Maher in his Hollywood Reporter cover story (more a stream-of-consciousness riff than an essay, actually). Conservative states may never vote for a socialist in the general election, but “this stuff has never been on the table, and these voters have never been activated.” Maher saves most of his bile for Donald Trump and Sarah Palin, writing that by nominating Palin as vice president “John McCain is the one who opened the Book of the Dead and let the monsters out.” And Trump is picking up where Palin left off.