Obama’s HHS Pick Advances With Republican Support

The Senate voted today to end debate on Sylvia Mathews Burwell’s nomination.

WASHINGTON, DC - MAY 14: Director of the White House Office of Management and Budget Sylvia Mathews Burwell takes her seat as she arrives at her confirmation hearing before the Senate Finance Committee May 14, 2014 on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC. If confirmed, Burwell will succeed Kathleen Sebelius to become the next secretary of Health and Human Services. (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images)
National Journal
Sophie Novack
See more stories about...
Sophie Novack
June 4, 2014, 8:23 a.m.

Obama­care is about to have a new ringlead­er, and she has both parties’ ap­prov­al.

In a pro­ced­ur­al vote Wed­nes­day af­ter­noon, the Sen­ate voted 67-28 to in­voke clo­ture on the nom­in­a­tion of Of­fice of Man­age­ment and Budget Dir­ect­or Sylvia Math­ews Bur­well to head the De­part­ment of Health and Hu­man Ser­vices — all but se­cur­ing her con­firm­a­tion. The Sen­ate is likely to hold a fi­nal vote Thursday, and Bur­well is ex­pec­ted to be eas­ily con­firmed.

As­sum­ing she is ap­proved, she will be the first ma­jor ap­pointee to be con­firmed since the Sen­ate in­voked the “nuc­le­ar op­tion,” re­quir­ing only 51 votes for ap­prov­al, in­stead of 60.

Bur­well will re­place out­go­ing Sec­ret­ary Kath­leen Se­beli­us, who an­nounced her resig­na­tion in April, fol­low­ing the botched rol­lout of Health­Care.gov. Re­pub­lic­ans had been call­ing for her de­par­ture for months, but Se­beli­us re­mained in the post through the end of the health care law’s first open-en­roll­ment peri­od, now leav­ing be­hind a much-im­proved en­roll­ment sys­tem and a tally of more than 8 mil­lion sign-ups — ex­ceed­ing the ad­min­is­tra­tion’s goal.

Yet Bur­well is set to in­her­it a post that car­ries a great deal of bag­gage, and she will be in charge of im­ple­ment­ing a law that is still mired in polit­ic­al up­heav­al and pub­lic dis­ap­prov­al. Demo­crats and Re­pub­lic­ans alike have cited her lead­er­ship abil­it­ies and strong man­age­ment style as evid­ence that she is up to the task.

The pre­sumed next HHS chief has com­manded the re­spect of both parties since be­fore her nom­in­a­tion: Bur­well was ap­proved for her cur­rent OMB post on a 96-0 vote. Be­fore today’s full Sen­ate vote, she sailed through two con­firm­a­tion hear­ings, in front of the Sen­ate Fin­ance and the Health, Edu­ca­tion, Labor, and Pen­sions com­mit­tees.

Bur­well’s nom­in­a­tion is now sub­ject to up to 30 hours of post-clo­ture de­bate be­fore the fi­nal vote.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
8 hours ago
NATIONAL JOURNAL AFTER DARK

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Source:
STATE VS. FEDERAL
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
8 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
8 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
8 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
9 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”

Source:
×