If the government wants to make progress in lowering obesity rates, it needs to start regulating fatty foods much the way it does tobacco.
That’s the recommendation from a pair of international health organizations pushing policies it says would answer the obesity epidemic.
Specifically, the groups recommend that the government control the way the food and beverage industry advertises, to ensure companies aren’t implying unhealthy food is good for children and adults. Additionally, they advise governments to require statements on food packaging about how high or low the content of salt, saturated fat, and sugar is in relation to dietary guidelines. On a broader scale, the organizations call for a reversal of food policy, calling on taxes for unhealthy foods and subsidies for healthy ones.
Consumers International and World Obesity Federation are presenting the global framework this week to the World Health Assembly in Geneva, Switzerland.
Ultimately, the groups say governments should remove artificial trans fats from all food within five years of their guidelines being adopted.
Much of the policy would face a difficult, if not impossible, path to passage in the U.S. Congress, but the groups did have one suggestion that is already being put into place. The groups recommend that restaurants be required to post calorie information about their food — a requirement already being implemented in the U.S. as part of the Affordable Care Act.
Global deaths related to obesity have risen from 2.6 million in 2005 to 3.4 million in 2010, according to the organizations.
More than 1.4 billion adults are overweight and at risk of negative health consequences, such as cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and cancer, according to 2008 statistics from the World Health Organization.
What We're Following See More »
Hillary Clinton hopes that television ratings for the candidates' acceptance speeches at their respective conventions aren't foreshadowing of similar results at the polls in November. Preliminary results from the networks and cable channels show that 34.9 million people tuned in for Donald Trump's acceptance speech while 33.3 million watched Clinton accept the Democratic nomination. However, it is still possible that the numbers are closer than these ratings suggest: the numbers don't include ratings from PBS or CSPAN, which tend to attract more Democratic viewers.