Red wine and chocolate might be the perfect combination for recharging after a long day, but a new study suggests they’re not the magical elixir for a longer life.
Researchers at Johns Hopkins University found that resveratrol — the antioxidant in red wine and chocolate that has long been cited as a possible explanation for the “French Paradox” — actually has little effect on aging.
Researchers tracked for 11 years roughly 800 Italian men and women age 65 and older to determine if the levels of resveratrol in their diet played a role in reducing inflammation, cancer, cardiovascular disease, and death. They found no association between resveratrol and longevity of life.
Richard Semba, a professor at Johns Hopkins and the lead researcher on the project, said it oversimplifies the “French Paradox” to credit resveratrol intake through heavy wine consumption as the reason the French have low rates of cardiovascular disease despite a diet rich in fatty foods.
“I think there are other factors involved,” Semba said. “Other antioxidants other than resveratrol could contribute, “¦ or smaller portions and more exercise. The ‘French Paradox’ is still kind of a hypothesis. It doesn’t seem to make sense.”
The National Institute on Aging funded the research, which was conducted independently of the agency.
The research doesn’t overturn the so-called French Paradox altogether — other chemical compounds in red wine and chocolate could still offer health benefits, Semba says. And resveratrol has been linked in earlier tests of nonhuman species such as mice to anti-aging benefits, reduced risk of blood clotting, and prevention against obesity and diabetes.
But the findings from Johns Hopkins are based on the first studies using human subjects to determine the effects of resveratrol on aging, according to Semba.
So when it comes to buying resveratrol in dietary supplements, he doesn’t recommend shelling out the dough. Semba calls the supplements a “false hope” — about as effective as drinking large quantities of red wine to improve your health.
What We're Following See More »
Trump, in a statement: “Based on the fact that the Democratic nominating process is totally rigged and Crooked Hillary Clinton and Deborah Wasserman Schultz will not allow Bernie Sanders to win, and now that I am the presumptive Republican nominee, it seems inappropriate that I would debate the second place finisher. ... I will wait to debate the first place finisher in the Democratic Party, probably Crooked Hillary Clinton, or whoever it may be.”
"It's about time for unity," said UAW President Dennis Williams. "We're endorsing Hillary Clinton. She's gotten 3 million more votes than Bernie, a million more votes than Donald Trump. She's our nominee." He called Sanders "a great friend of the UAW" while saying Trump "does not support the economic security of UAW families." Some 28 percent of UAW members indicated their support for Trump in an internal survey.
"Donald Trump on Thursday reached the number of delegates needed to clinch the Republican nomination for president, completing an unlikely rise that has upended the political landscape and sets the stage for a bitter fall campaign. Trump was put over the top in the Associated Press delegate count by a small number of the party's unbound delegates who told the AP they would support him at the convention."
"Clinton and Bernie Sanders "are now devoting additional money to television advertising. A day after Sanders announced a new ad buy of less than $2 million in the state, Clinton announced her own television campaign. Ads featuring actor Morgan Freeman as well as labor leader and civil rights activist Dolores Huerta will air beginning on Fridayin Fresno, Sacramento, and Los Angeles media markets. Some ads will also target Latino voters and Asian American voters. The total value of the buy is about six figures according to the Clinton campaign." Meanwhile, a new poll shows Sanders within the margin of error, trailing Clinton 44%-46%.