Why Public Opinion of Obamacare Remains Negative

More than 8 million people got covered, but that’s not changing the health law’s approval ratings.

WASHINGTON, DC - MARCH 27: Sisters and Tea Party members of Atlanta, Georgia, Judy Burel (L) and Janis Haddon (R), protest the Obamacare in front of the U.S. Supreme Court March 27, 2012 in Washington, DC. The Supreme Court continued to hear oral arguments on the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images)
National Journal
Clara Ritger
April 28, 2014, 8:05 p.m.

Des­pite mil­lions of Amer­ic­ans get­ting covered by Obama­care — which Demo­crats had long said would im­prove the health law’s fa­vor­ab­il­ity rat­ings — pub­lic opin­ion re­mains neg­at­ive.

Some 48 per­cent hold an un­fa­vor­able view of the Af­ford­able Care Act, com­pared with 38 per­cent fa­vor­able — num­bers that are vir­tu­ally un­changed from pre­vi­ous months — ac­cord­ing to the latest Kais­er Health Track­ing Poll, re­leased Tues­day.

In the time between the March and April polls, en­roll­ment ex­ceeded the ad­min­is­tra­tion’s own ex­pect­a­tions and was largely con­sidered a suc­cess­ful start for the health law’s ex­changes.

“People’s opin­ions are pretty set, and so di­vided by polit­ic­al party, that we think people are still judging the law through their par­tis­an lens,” said Liz Hamel, dir­ect­or of the found­a­tion’s pub­lic opin­ion and sur­vey re­search. “Eight mil­lion is a lot of people, but in terms of the share re­port­ing on pub­lic opin­ion of the law, it’s a small share.”

Over time, pub­lic opin­ion has re­mained steady, with the ex­cep­tion of a bump in the num­ber hold­ing neg­at­ive views after Oc­to­ber’s messy launch of Health­Care.gov. It’ll take time for sen­ti­ments to change as con­sumers use their new cov­er­age, but for Obama­care to see pos­it­ive rat­ings, Hamel said, people will also have to like that cov­er­age.

Mis­in­form­a­tion may also be the cul­prit be­hind the health law’s low ap­prov­al rat­ings. Some 57 per­cent of re­spond­ents said the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion fell short of its en­roll­ment goal, des­pite re­ports that health cov­er­age sign-ups sur­passed 8 mil­lion, far and above the Con­gres­sion­al Budget Of­fice’s 7 mil­lion es­tim­ate (and re­vised 6 mil­lion pro­jec­tion, fol­low­ing the tech troubles of the first two months of open en­roll­ment).

Kais­er’s re­search­ers con­duc­ted the sur­vey April 15-21 among a na­tion­ally rep­res­ent­at­ive ran­dom sample of 1,504 adults. The found­a­tion has been con­duct­ing the monthly pub­lic opin­ion sur­vey since the law passed in 2010.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
CITIZENS UNITED PT. 2?
Movie Based on ‘Clinton Cash’ to Debut at Cannes
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."

Source:
×