For the first time, the Food and Drug Administration has extended its tobacco-oversight authority to e-cigarettes, cigars, and pipe tobacco, but antismoking advocates say the regulations don’t go far enough.
The FDA proposed Thursday a ban on the sale of e-cigarettes and other newly regulated products to persons under 18. It also required the products to carry warning labels about the addictive nature of nicotine. E-cigarettes, cigars, and pipe tobacco would be treated like traditional combustible cigarettes under the new rules. E-cigarettes vaporize nicotine, different from traditional combustible cigarettes which burn tobacco, a process known to release carcinogens.
Sen. Dick Durbin, an Illinois Democrat who has been among those in Congress pushing the FDA to regulate the e-cigarette market, called the FDA’s announcement “a political compromise” with the tobacco industry.
“Prohibiting sales to kids but doing nothing to protect children from candy-flavored marketing in children’s venues is an awful outcome,” Durbin said in an email. “Parents across America lost their best ally in protecting their kids from this insidious product.”
Although the agency has had the power to set guidelines for the e-cigarette market since 2009, when Congress passed the Tobacco Control Act, years of meetings with industry lobbyists and antismoking advocates led to Thursday’s regulations, seen by many as a “first step” in determining just how the FDA should assert its power over the growing e-cigarette industry.
“There’s so much potential for e-cigarettes to be safer,” said David Abrams, executive director of the Schroeder Institute for Tobacco Research and Policy Studies at the Legacy Foundation, an antismoking nonprofit devoted to tobacco control. “If people switch to good-quality, regulated e-cigarettes, we could see a drop in the death and disease rates caused by traditional combustible cigarettes.”
The new regulations set the stage for the FDA to begin testing products on the market to determine their impact on public health. They also allow the FDA to monitor for quality control the market that was once described by Commissioner Margaret Hamburg as the “Wild, Wild West.”
Makers would have to register their products with the FDA and disclose ingredients. New tobacco products could only be marketed after FDA approval. Claims of products having a reduced risk of death and disease could only be marketed with scientific evidence.
“Tobacco-related disease and death is one of the most critical public-health challenges before the FDA,” said Mitch Zeller, director of the FDA’s Center for Tobacco Products, in a press release. “The proposed rule would give the FDA additional tools to protect the public health in today’s rapidly evolving tobacco marketplace, including the review of new tobacco products and their health-related claims.”
The proposed rule sets in motion a 75-day comment period. Final regulations could take up to a year, antismoking advocates say.
One industry lobby group, the Tobacco Vapor Electronic Cigarette Association, said the FDA’s move will add necessary oversight to the e-cigarette market.
“This will help the industry thrive as it will demand that those irresponsible players adhere to rules and regulations that the responsible industry already abides by,” the group wrote in a letter posted online. “This will not just benefit the e-cig industry but ultimately the end user, as they will now get a reliable and consistent product that has been manufactured with the highest degree of oversight and control.”
But antismoking advocates, while pleased that the FDA had asserted its authority after a long wait, said what was missing from the proposal was worrisome.
The FDA did not propose restrictions on radio and television advertising, or limitations on candy-flavored products, which representatives from the American Cancer Society’s Cancer Action Network said were used by tobacco companies to hook youth.
“We think it’s critical that the FDA move as quickly as possible to address the advertising strategies and the design of the products that are clearly designed to be attractive to kids,” said Gregg Haifley, ACSCAN’s associate director of federal relations.
The FDA also proposed exempting premium cigars from oversight.
“There are health consequences associated with tobacco products, and we don’t think any should be exempt from regulation by the FDA,” Haifley said.
What We're Following See More »
Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.
Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”
Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."
In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-expected primary battle behind her, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton (D) is no longer going on the air in upcoming primary states. “Team Clinton hasn’t spent a single cent in … California, Indiana, Kentucky, Oregon and West Virginia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “campaign has spent a little more than $1 million in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone backer in the Senate, said the candidate should end his presidential campaign if he’s losing to Hillary Clinton after the primary season concludes in June, breaking sharply with the candidate who is vowing to take his insurgent bid to the party convention in Philadelphia.”
The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."