Fewer people are being diagnosed with colon cancer because more people are getting screened, a new study finds.
Colonoscopy use has tripled among adults ages 50 to 75, according to findings released Monday by the American Cancer Society. In 2010, some 55 percent of older Americans received colonoscopies, up from 19 percent in 2000.
Incidence rates of colon cancer among older Americans dropped by 30 percent from 2001-10, according to the data.
Colorectal cancer, commonly known as colon cancer, is the third most common cancer and the third leading cause of cancer death among men and women in the United States.
Screenings are an important prevention tool, because colon cancer begins as a precancerous polyp, which doctors can remove before it develops into tumor. Screenings can also detect cancer early, and early treatment increases the likelihood of survival. Some 90 percent of patients survive when colon cancer has been diagnosed before it has spread, compared with 70 percent when it has spread to nearby organs and 13 percent when it has spread to distant organs.
The data comes as the Health and Human Services Department and National Colorectal Cancer Roundtable — an organization founded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American Cancer Society — make a new nationwide push to increase screening rates to 80 percent by 2018.
“These continuing drops in incidence and mortality show the lifesaving potential of colon cancer screening — a potential that an estimated 23 million Americans between ages 50 and 75 are not benefiting from because they are not up to date on screening,” said Richard Wender, American Cancer Society chief cancer control officer, in a press release.
The number of Americans receiving colonoscopies and related screenings is expected to go up as more Americans obtain health insurance and get access to preventive screenings at little to no cost, one of the primary provisions of the Affordable Care Act.
The results of the study were published in the March/April issue of CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. Researchers evaluated data from the CDC and the National Cancer Institute in preparing the report.
- 1 House Ethics Panel Won’t Take Action Against Petri, Hastings
- 2 Emails May Be a Key to Addressing ‘Pay-to-Play’ Whispers at Clinton Foundation
- 3 The (Still) Treacherous Politics of Criminal-Justice Reform
- 4 Which Candidates Are Taking Uber to Luxury Hotels?
- 5 Flint Crisis Exposes Messy Politics of Disaster Relief
What We're Following See More »
Under pressure from a judge, the State Department will release about 550 of Hillary Clinton’s emails—“roughly 14 percent of the 3,700 remaining Clinton emails—on Saturday, in the middle of the Presidents Day holiday weekend.” All of the emails were supposed to have been released last month. Related: State subpoenaed the Clinton Foundation last year, which brings the total number of current Clinton investigations to four, says the Daily Caller.
UPDATED: Sen. Jim Webb (D-VA) will not be playing the role of Ralph Nader in this year’s election. Speaking in Dallas today, Webb said, “We looked at the possibility of an independent candidacy. Theoretically, it could be done, but it is enormously costly and time sensitive, and I don’t see the fundraising trajectory where we could make a realistic run.”
“The leaders of the Republican and Democratic national committees on Wednesday weighed in on the prospect of an independent presidential run by” former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg (I). “DNC Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz suggested that the former New York City mayor’s priorities are already ‘well cared-for’ in the Democratic platform, while RNC leader Reince Priebus welcomed the idea, saying Bloomberg would siphon off votes from the Democratic candidate.”
Three hundred fifty-two, thanks to superdelegates pledged to Clinton, and the vagaries of the delegate allocation process in early states. Not bad, considering her results have been a virtual tie and a blowout loss.